Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Experience for surgical treatment and analyzing complication of carotid body tumor / 国际外科学杂志
International Journal of Surgery ; (12): 188-192,封3-封4, 2018.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-693218
ABSTRACT
Objective To analyze and summarize the experience of surgical treatment of carotid body tumor and prevention of relevant complications.Methods The clinical data of 45 cases of carotid body tumor diagnosed and treated by Department of Vascular Surgery,People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from August 1996 to June 2016 were retrospectively analyzed.All the patients were followed up for 18 months and were followed up in Department of Vascular Surgery,People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region inpatient or outpatient review form,the main observation during follow-up of patients with postoperative complications and recovery.Carotid compression test (Matas test) will be performed 2 weeks preoperation.There were 20 males (4 carotid body lesions located on both sides,16 carotid body lesions on the unilateral side) and 25 females (1 carotid body lesion located on both sides of the neck,neck arteriomatous lesions in unilateral patients were 24 cases),duration of 0.5 to 6.0 years,the average duration of 3 years,analysis of postoperative complications.Results All the operations were successful.There were no perioperative deaths.Among the 45 patients undergoing surgical treatment,one or more surgical procedures were used.Thirty patients were followed up and the remaining 15 patients were lost to follow-up.During an average follow-up of 18 months,complications included 1 stroke,8 hypoglossal nerve injury,13 vagal injury ard 9 homer syndrome.No recurrence of patients was followed up within 6 months,the basic symptoms of nerve injury,1 case of vagus nerve and the tumor was followed up for 6 months,there was still difficulty swallowing and hoarseness.Five cases of bilateral lesions,including 3 cases underwent bilateral staging surgery,the operation was successful.One case of unilateral excision after vagal injury,it did not contralateral surgery;one case of one-sided surgery after the lost,the contralateral did not receive surgery.Conclusions Hoarseness after operation is not caused by recurrent laryngeal nerve injury,and it was recommended that bilateran lesions with smaller one should removed firstly.Matas test could not be regarded as criterion of intraoperative ligation during the operation.

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Chinês Revista: International Journal of Surgery Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Artigo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Chinês Revista: International Journal of Surgery Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Artigo