Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety comparison of everolimus and fulvestrant in patients with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer progressed after endocrine therapy / 实用医学杂志
The Journal of Practical Medicine ; (24): 1581-1584, 2018.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-697823
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of everolimus combined with endocrine therapy and fulvestrant in patients with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer progressed after endocrine thera-py. Methods Ninety-three breast cancer patients were selected from January 2014 to February 2017. The primary end points were progression-free survival and clinical benefit rate and the secondary end points was tolerability. Re-sults The progression-free survival in fulvestrant group was slightly higher than that in the everolimus group(13.4 months vs 12.2 months,P = 0.297). The clinical benefit rates were 46.15% and 31.71% in fulvestrant group and everolimus group,respectively. Patients treated with fewer than 2 lines and endocrine resistant patients benefited more from fulvestrant but without statistical difference. The main adverse events related to everolimus were stomati-tis,with a prevalence rate of about 26% and a localized pneumonia with a prevalence rate of about 10%. The main adverse reaction of fulvestrant was the injection site reaction. Conclusions The efficacy of everolimus in combina-tion with endocrine therapy is not superior to that of fulvestrant for the treatment of advanced breast cancer pro-gressed after endocrine therapy. After weighing the clinical benefits and quality of life,fulvestrant may be better for patients treated with fewer than 2 lines and endocrine resistance.

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Chinês Revista: The Journal of Practical Medicine Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Artigo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Chinês Revista: The Journal of Practical Medicine Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Artigo