Quality appraisal of evidence-based guidelines on prevention and repair of perineal injury at vaginal delivery / 中华护理杂志
Chinese Journal of Nursing
; (12): 162-168, 2018.
Article
em Zh
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-708713
Biblioteca responsável:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
Objective To review the methodological quality of evidence-based guidelines on prevention and repair of perineal injury at vaginal delivery,and analyze the characteristics of guidelines to provide references for evidence-based decision-making.Methods We systematically searched websites of professional organizations,websites of clinical practice guidelines and databases for guidelines on prevention and repair of perineal injury,and used AGREE Ⅱ to evaluate the chosen guidelines.Results We identified totally 7 relevant evidence-based guidelines in this field.The average standardized scores of guidelines in 6 domains of AGREE Ⅱ were 90.21%(scope and purpose),68.25% (stakeholder involvement),69.94% (rigor of development),89.41% (clarity of presentations),70.63% (applicability),and 68.25%(independence),respectively.The overall standardized score for 7 guidelines was 75.65%,and the total score was 5.67 (7 points).For overall quality,4 of them were grade A and 3 of them were grade B.Conclusion The overall quality of included guidelines were high,but stakeholder involvement,rigor of development and independence in some guidelines needs to be improved.There was no Chinese evidence-based gui-deline in this field,and high-quality foreign guidelines could be used as evidence in combination with local conditions.
Texto completo:
1
Índice:
WPRIM
Tipo de estudo:
Guideline
/
Prognostic_studies
Idioma:
Zh
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Nursing
Ano de publicação:
2018
Tipo de documento:
Article