Comparison Between Double-port and Three-port Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy / 中国微创外科杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the clinical outcomes of double-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 72 patients who underwent double-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy(DP group)from October 2014 to December 2015 in our hospital.A paired comparison was made with 72 patients who had the same lesion location and the nature(benign or malignant)and underwent three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy(TP group)in the same period.The clinical outcomes included operation time, intraoperative blood loss,the number of lymph node, the chest tube time,postoperative hospital stay, incision pain VAS scores within three days and complications.Postoperative follow-ups were taken with telephone calls or out-patient reviews. Results No operative morality occurred in both groups.There were no statistical significances between the DP Group and the TP Group in intraoperative blood loss[(107.9 ±56.6)ml vs.(95.0 ± 46.8)ml,t=1.490,P=0.138],the number of lymph node(13.9 ±2.7 vs.14.5 ±2.6,t=1.358,P=0.177)and complication rate[11.1%(8/72)vs.9.7%(7/72),χ2=0.074,P=0.785].The DP group had significant longer operation time[(153.6 ± 22.6)min vs.(143.6 ±25.8)min, t=2.474, P=0.015], shorter chest tube time[(5.2 ±1.7)d vs.(6.4 ±1.1)d, t=5.029,P=0.000],shorter postoperative hospital stay[(6.1 ±1.6)d vs.7.6 ±1.2, t=6.364, P=0.000], and lower incision pain VAS scores within three days[(12.3 ±1.9)points vs.(14.4 ±1.8)points, t=6.808, P=0.000]as compared to the TP group.No short-term complication was noticed in both groups during a follow-up time ranged from 6 to 20 months. Conclusions Double-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy is safe and feasible.It is a preferred surgical mode for selected cases.