Comparison of Two Local Anesthesia Injection Methods During a Transrectal Ultrasonography-guided Prostate Biopsy
Journal of the Korean Society of Medical Ultrasound
;
: 165-169, 2010.
Artigo
em Inglês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-725586
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
To compare the effectiveness of 2 injection methods of lidocaine during a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy for pain control and complication rates. MATERIALS ANDMETHODS:
We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent a TRUS-guided prostate biopsy from March 2005 to March 2006. One hundred patients were categorized into two groups based on injection method. For group 1, 10 mL of 1% lidocaine was injected bilaterally at the junction of the seminal vesicle and prostate and for group 2, into Denonvilliers' fascia. Pain scores using a visual analog scale (VAS) as well as immediate and delayed complication rates were evaluated.RESULTS:
The mean VAS score showed no significant differences between the groups (group 1, 3.4+/-1.78; group 2, 2.8+/-1.3; p = 0.062). The difference in delayed complication rates and incidence of hematuria, hemospermia, and blood via the rectum was not significant between groups. However, two patients in group 1 complained of symptoms immediately after local anesthesia; one of tinnitus and the other of mild dizziness.CONCLUSION:
There were no significant differences between pain control and complication rates between the 2 lidocaine injection methods. However, injection into Denonvilliers' fascia is thought to have less potential risk.
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Assunto principal:
Próstata
/
Reto
/
Glândulas Seminais
/
Zumbido
/
Biópsia
/
Incidência
/
Estudos Retrospectivos
/
Tontura
/
Hemospermia
/
Fáscia
Tipo de estudo:
Estudo diagnóstico
/
Estudo de incidência
/
Estudo observacional
/
Estudo prognóstico
Limite:
Humanos
Idioma:
Inglês
Revista:
Journal of the Korean Society of Medical Ultrasound
Ano de publicação:
2010
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS