Comparison between Cementless and Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis / 대한고관절학회지
Hip & Pelvis
;
: 241-253, 2018.
Artigo
em Inglês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-740440
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
This study was conducted to compare cemented and cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures via meta-analysis and systematic review of relevant studies. MATERIALS ANDMETHODS:
Systematic review and meta-analysis were performed on 31 available clinical studies; 19 of these studies used cemented stems, 12 used cementless stems, one used both types of stems, and two studies involved a comparative analysis of both stem types.RESULTS:
There were statistically significant differences in rates of leg length discrepancy (LLD) greater than 1 cm between the cemented (event rate, 0.089) and cementless groups (event rate, 0.015 and 0.047; P=0.03).CONCLUSION:
Cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty and cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty performed on elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fracture revealed similar mortality and complication rates; however, the rate of LLD greater than 1 cm was significantly higher in the cemented group compared with the cementless group.
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Assunto principal:
Mortalidade
/
Hemiartroplastia
/
Quadril
/
Fraturas do Quadril
/
Perna (Membro)
/
Desigualdade de Membros Inferiores
Tipo de estudo:
Estudo prognóstico
/
Revisões Sistemáticas Avaliadas
Limite:
Idoso
/
Humanos
Idioma:
Inglês
Revista:
Hip & Pelvis
Ano de publicação:
2018
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS