Hydroxyapatite-coated implant: Clinical prognosis assessment via a retrospective follow-up study for the average of 3 years
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
;
: 85-92, 2018.
Artigo
em Inglês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-742027
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
This research evaluated clinical outcomes of two types of hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants OT (Osstem TS III-HA, Osstem implant Co., Busan, Korea) and ZM (Zimmer TSV-HA, Zimmer dental, Carlsbad, USA). MATERIALS ANDMETHODS:
The research was conducted on 303 implants (89 of OT, 214 of ZM), which were placed from January 16, 2010 to December 20, 2012. The prognosis was evaluated in terms of success rates, survival rates, annual marginal bone loss, and implant stability quotients (ISQ). The samples were classified into immediate, early, conventional, and delayed groups according to the loading time.RESULTS:
Overall, there were no significant differences between OT and ZM in success rates, survival rates, and annual marginal bone loss, except for the result of secondary stability. OT showed 77.83 ± 8.23 ISQ, which was marginally higher than 76.09 ± 6.90 ISQ of ZM (P 82.48 ± 3.69 ISQ) (P .05).CONCLUSION:
OT (97.75%) and ZM (98.50%) showed relatively good outcomes in terms of survival rates. In general, OT and ZM did not show statistically significant differences in most indices (P>.05), although OT performed marginally better than ZM in the immediate loading and 1-stage surgery (P < .05).
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Assunto principal:
Prognóstico
/
Implantes Dentários
/
Taxa de Sobrevida
/
Estudos Retrospectivos
/
Seguimentos
/
Durapatita
Tipo de estudo:
Estudo observacional
/
Estudo prognóstico
Idioma:
Inglês
Revista:
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
Ano de publicação:
2018
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS