Efficacy and safety of harmonic scalpel in neck dissection: a Meta-analysis / 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
;
(24): 915-920, 2015.
Artigo
em Chinês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-747880
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE@#To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of harmonic scalpel in neck dissection.@*METHOD@#Available literatures of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, CBM, CNKI, WangFang and VIP published before June 2014 were searched. Inclusion criteria and quality assessment were performed. All data were analyzed by using RevMan 5.2 software.@*RESULT@#Fourteen studies including 632 cases were enrolled. Among them, 319 cases were in harmonic scalpel group and 313 cases in conventional resection group. Compared with conventional resection group, the harmonic scalpel group showed shorter surgery time(weighted mean difference [95% confidence intetval] -28.01 [-36.83, -19.19], Z = 6.22, P < 0.01)and less intra-operative blood loss (weighted mean difference [95% confidence intetval] -46.68 [-57.25, -36.12], Z = 8.66, P < 0.01). The number of cervical lymph nodes dissected and the incidence of postoperative chylous leakage were similar in both groups.@*CONCLUSION@#Using the harmonic scalpel in neck dissection was as efficient and safe as that of the conventional technique with the advantage of shorter time of surgery and less intraoperative blood loss.
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Assunto principal:
Período Pós-Operatório
/
Esvaziamento Cervical
/
Cirurgia Geral
/
Instrumentos Cirúrgicos
/
Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica
/
Linfonodos
/
Pescoço
Tipo de estudo:
Revisões Sistemáticas Avaliadas
Limite:
Humanos
Idioma:
Chinês
Revista:
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
Ano de publicação:
2015
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS