Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
'Need of the Hour': Early Diagnosis and Management of Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis of the Spine: An Analysis of 30 Patients from a “High Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis Burden” Country
Asian Spine Journal ; : 265-271, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-762926
ABSTRACT
STUDY

DESIGN:

Retrospective study.

PURPOSE:

To report the prevalence of patients with multidrug-resistant (MDR) tubercular spondylodiscitis and their outcomes. Additionally, to assess the role of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in early detection of MDR tuberculosis. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE MDR tuberculosis is increasing globally. The World Health Organization (WHO) has strongly recommended Xpert MTB/RIF assay for early detection of tuberculosis.

METHODS:

From 2006 to 2015, a retrospective study was conducted on patients treated for MDR tuberculosis of the spine. Only patients whose diagnosis was confirmed using either culture and/or the Xpert MTB/RIF assay were included. Diagnostic method, treatment regimen, time taken to initiate second-line antituberculosis treatment (ATT), drug-related complications, and cost of medications were analyzed. All patients with MDR were treated according to the WHO recommendations for 2 years. The outcome parameters analyzed included clinical, biochemical, and radiological criteria to assess healing status.

RESULTS:

From 2006 to 2015, a total of 730 patients were treated for tubercular spondylodiscitis. Of those, 36 had MDR tubercular spondylitis (prevalence, 4.9%), and three had extremely drug resistant tubercular spondylitis (prevalence, 0.4%). In this study, 30 patients, with a mean age of 29 years and a mean post-treatment follow-up of 24 months, were enrolled. The majority (77%) had secondary MDR, 17 (56%) underwent surgery, and 26 (87%) completed treatment for 2 years and were healed. Drug-related complications (33%) included ototoxicity, hypothyroidism, and hyperpigmentation of the skin. The average time taken for initiation of second line ATT for MDR patients with Xpert MTB/RIF assay as the diagnostic tool was 18 days, when compared to patients for whom the assay was not available which was 243 days.

CONCLUSIONS:

The prevalence of MDR tubercular spondylodiscitis was 4.9%. In total, 87% of patients were healed with adequate treatment. The sensitivity and specificity of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay to detect MDR was 100% and 92.3%, respectively.
Assuntos

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Assunto principal: Pele / Coluna Vertebral / Espondilite / Tuberculose / Organização Mundial da Saúde / Discite / Prevalência / Estudos Retrospectivos / Seguimentos / Sensibilidade e Especificidade Tipo de estudo: Estudo diagnóstico / Guia de Prática Clínica / Estudo observacional / Estudo de prevalência / Estudo prognóstico / Fatores de risco / Estudo de rastreamento Limite: Humanos Idioma: Inglês Revista: Asian Spine Journal Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Artigo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Assunto principal: Pele / Coluna Vertebral / Espondilite / Tuberculose / Organização Mundial da Saúde / Discite / Prevalência / Estudos Retrospectivos / Seguimentos / Sensibilidade e Especificidade Tipo de estudo: Estudo diagnóstico / Guia de Prática Clínica / Estudo observacional / Estudo de prevalência / Estudo prognóstico / Fatores de risco / Estudo de rastreamento Limite: Humanos Idioma: Inglês Revista: Asian Spine Journal Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Artigo