Expert consensus on classification evaluation methods of burn surgery in China (2019 version) / 中华烧伤杂志
Chinese Journal of Burns
; (6): 769-771, 2019.
Article
em Zh
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-775161
Biblioteca responsável:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
At the beginning of 2009, the 38th principle of the issued by the former Ministry of Health, clearly pointed out that medical institutions should establish a hierarchical management system for surgery. Then the was published and implemented in 2012, but the official introduction of surgical classification catalogue in the national level has not been seen. Therefore, the writing group of this expert consensus has organized numerous well-known experts and scholars in China, taking the three elements of the 38th principle of the issued by the Ministry of Health--risk coefficient, complexity, and technical difficulty as the basic norm to grade scientifically through the four indicators of burn index, surgical area, surgical repair method, and anesthesia risk (each indicator with 4 grades and scores). The total score is then accumulated to divide four grades of operations. The (2019 ) is strategized together expecting to provide academic reference for the government departments to issue or further improve and perfect surgical classification catalogue in the national level as soon as possible, and lay a foundation for the stable development of burn discipline with the significance of national strategic reserve.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Índice:
WPRIM
Assunto principal:
Padrões de Referência
/
Cirurgia Geral
/
Queimaduras
/
China
/
Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
/
Consenso
Tipo de estudo:
Guideline
Limite:
Humans
País/Região como assunto:
Asia
Idioma:
Zh
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Burns
Ano de publicação:
2019
Tipo de documento:
Article