Comparison of Postoperative Stability between Distraction Osteogenesis and Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy in Mandibular Retrognathism

ABSTRACT

0.05). Mean follow up periods were 10.77 months for BSSRO group and 11.28 months for DO group, respectively. After mandibular advancement, mean positional changes in the condyle were 0.56+/-1.43 mm horizontally and 0.72+/-1.61 mm vertically for BSSRO group and 0.53+/-1.56 mm horizontally and 0.56+/-1.75 mm vertically for DO group, respectively. Mean change of distance from B point to Y-axis was -1.76+/-0.83 mm for BSSRO group and -2.14+/-1.82 mm for DO group, respectively. According to the condylar position and B point, there were no significant differences in postoperative stability between the two groups (P>0.05).CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in postoperative stability between DO and BSSRO group according to condylar position and B point. Based on the results of the present study, it is hypothesized that DO would be a good treatment choice for severe mandibular retrognathism because DO could achieve more mandibular advancement and concurrent soft tissue elongation.