Comparisons for kits HAVAb2.0 and HAV-IgG / 中华实验和临床病毒学杂志
Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Virology
;
(6): 169-171, 2017.
Artigo
em Chinês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-808160
ABSTRACT
Objective@#Two kits for detecting anti-HAV antibody produced by Abbott Laboratories are evaluated for their performance in order to use in the anti-HAV antibodies detections.@*Methods@#Serially diluted standard reference serum were detected 4 times with HAVAb2.0 kit and HAV-IgG kit , then fit standard curves and calculated Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). 120 serum that have different levels of anti-HAV antibodies were chosen to be detected by two kits and calculated sensitivity and specificity, receive operation characteristic (ROC) curve and area under curve (AUC) while the results of HAV-IgG were used as golden standard.@*Results@#R2 and ICC for HAV-IgG were 0.9977 and 0.999, respectively, higher than 0.9893 and 0.995(P>0.05) for HAVAb2.0. Sensitivity and specificity for HAVAb2.0 were 93.15% and 100% and AUC was 0.994 when kit HAV-IgG was chosen as golden standard.@*Conclusion@#There is little difference in performance between HAV-IgG and HAVAb2.0, both of them can be used in anti-HAV antibodies detection.
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Tipo de estudo:
Estudo prognóstico
Idioma:
Chinês
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Virology
Ano de publicação:
2017
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS