Safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy / 中南大学学报(医学版)
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences)
;
(12): 825-829, 2009.
Artigo
em Chinês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-814263
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE@#To assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide (CO(2)) in colonoscopy examination.@*METHODS@#We randomized 349 patients to undergo colonoscopy with insufflation of air (n=175) or CO(2) (n=174). At colonoscopy, p (ET CO(2)) was observed at 4 time points before the exam, arrived caecum, back rectum, and after the exam. Patient's experience of pain in the end and after the examination at 1, 3, 6, and 24 h was registered using a visual analog scale (VAS). Sedation was not used routinely.@*RESULTS@#The groups were similar in age, sex, inspection time, and caecal intubation rate (all P>0.05). There were no significant differences in p (ET CO(2)) values between the 2 groups before and after the procedure (all P>0.05). VAS scores in the CO(2) group at various time points after the examination were significantly lower than those in the air group (all P<0.05). The percent of VAS scores of 0 in the CO(2) group after 1, 3, 6, and 24 h was significantly higher than that in the air group (all P<0.01).@*CONCLUSION@#Injection of CO(2) for colonoscopy will not cause CO(2) retention, and it may significantly reduce the pain, which is safe and effective.
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Assunto principal:
Segurança
/
Monitorização Transcutânea dos Gases Sanguíneos
/
Dióxido de Carbono
/
Dor Abdominal
/
Colonoscopia
/
Métodos
Tipo de estudo:
Ensaio Clínico Controlado
Limite:
Adulto
/
Feminino
/
Humanos
/
Masculino
Idioma:
Chinês
Revista:
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences)
Ano de publicação:
2009
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS