Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparison of femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction using a 70° arthroscope through the anterolateral portal versus a 30° arthroscope through the anteromedial portal: a pilot 3D-CT study
The Journal of Korean Knee Society ; : e17-2020.
Artigo | WPRIM | ID: wpr-834990
ABSTRACT
Background@#Graft malposition is a risk factor for failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A 70° arthroscope improves visualisation of the medial wall of the lateral femoral condyle without switching portals. We investigated whether the use of this arthroscope affected the accuracy and precision of femoral tunnel placement. @*Methods@#Fifty consecutive adult patients were recruited. Following one withdrawal and two exclusions, 47 patients (30 in group 1 (70° arthroscope), 17 in group 2 (30° arthroscope)) underwent three-dimensional computed tomography imaging using a grid-based system to measure tunnel position. @*Results@#No difference was found in the accuracy or precision of tunnels (mean position group 1 = 33.3 ± 6.0% deep–shallow, 27.2 ± 5.2% high–low; group 2 = 31.7 ± 6.9% deep–shallow, 29.0 ± 6.2% high–low; not significant). A post-hoc power analysis suggests a study of 106 patients would be required. @*Conclusions@#This pilot study suggests that tunnel position is not affected by the arthroscope used. An appropriately powered study could investigate this finding alongside other potential benefits of using a 70° arthroscope for this procedure.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02816606. Registered on 28 June 2016.
Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Revista: The Journal of Korean Knee Society Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Artigo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Revista: The Journal of Korean Knee Society Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Artigo