Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical comparative study of double tract reconstruction of proximal gastric resection and Roux-en-Y of total gastrectomy in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction / 中国医师杂志
Journal of Chinese Physician ; (12): 1327-1331, 2020.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-867391
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To investigate the clinical efficacy of double tract reconstruction of proximal gastric resection and Roux-en-Y total gastrectomy in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction, in order to provide reference for clinical selection.

Methods:

From June 2016 to June 2018, patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction in Chifeng City hospital were prospectively selected and randomly divided into proximal gastrectomy double channel anastomosis group (PG group) and total gastrectomy Roux-en-Y anastomosis group (TG group). The perioperative indexes, clinical pathology, early (≤ 30 days) and late (> 30 days) complications of the two groups were compared, and the nutritional status [body mass index (BMI), prealbumin, albumin, total protein], and anemia degree [hemoglobin (Hb), red blood cell count (RBC)] of the two groups at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after operation were compared.

Results:

A total of 83 patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction were admitted, including 62 patients who were eligible for surgery, 31 cases in each group, 1 case in each group was lost to follow-up, and 30 cases in each group. There were no tumor recurrence or death in two groups. There were no statistically significant differences in age, gender, tumor size, tumor stage, preoperative complications, preoperative nutritional status and anemia between the two groups ( P>0.05). The time of first exhaust, time of starting fluid feeding and postoperative hospitalization in PG group was significantly earlier than that in TG group [(3.0±0.7)days vs (4.2±0.7)days, (7.9±0.9)days vs (9.0±0.9)days, (13.3±1.1)days vs (14.6±0.9)days, P<0.05], while the operation time was slightly longer [(252.0±36.9)min vs (225.8±31.1)min, P<0.05]. There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss and number of lymph node dissection between PG group and TG group [(241.7±81.0)ml vs (245.8±71.9)ml, (40.5±12.2)nodes vs (43.2±10.3)nodes, P>0.05]. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of early and late postoperative complications ( P>0.05). The incidence of reflux esophagitis in PG group was less than that in TG group ( P<0.05). The nutritional status of PG group was significantly better than TG group in 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the operation ( P<0.05). The Hb and RBC decreased in both groups at 3 and 6 months after operation, and the Hb and RBC in PG group were higher than those in TG group. There was no anemia in PG group and TG group 12 months after operation.

Conclusions:

Double tract reconstruction of proximal gastric resection is effective in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. It is worthy of further clinical promotion.
Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Chinês Revista: Journal of Chinese Physician Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Artigo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Chinês Revista: Journal of Chinese Physician Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Artigo