Meta-analysis of clinical efficacy after FS-LASIK and ICL implantation / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)
International Eye Science
;
(12): 480-486, 2021.
Artigo
em Chinês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-873449
ABSTRACT
@#AIM:
To compare the clinical effects of FS-LASIK and ICL implantation.<p>METHODS:
From January 2015 to January 2020, used computer to search the clinical contrast test of FS-LASIK and ICL implantation published in CNKI database, Wanfang database, Chongqing VIP Chinese Sci tech journal full-text database, China Bioligy Medicine disc(CBMdisc), Cochrane Library, PubMed, MEDLINE and other databases,using rev-man5.3 statistical software for Meta-analysis and statistical processing.<p>RESULTS:
Totally 11 studies were brought into the analysis, including 673 patients and 1 301 operative eyes. The results of Meta-analysis showed that there was no statistical significance in the safety, objective visual quality, spherical equivalent degree, cylinder, diopter of correction, trefoil aberration and coma aberration of FS-LASIK and ICL implantation after operation, but there was statistical significance in the effectiveness, total higher-order aberration, spherical aberration and contrast sensitivity of FS-LASIK and ICL implantation after operation.<p>CONCLUSION:
Compared with ICL implantation, the total high-order aberrations and spherical aberrations of FS-LASIK are larger, and the contrast sensitivity is lower. The ICL implantation has more clinical-effect superioity than FS-LASIK, meanwhile it has reversibility and less complications.
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Tipo de estudo:
Revisões Sistemáticas Avaliadas
Idioma:
Chinês
Revista:
International Eye Science
Ano de publicação:
2021
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS