Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Difference in Bonding Strength of RMGIC according to Type of Hemostatic Agent in Primary Tooth / 대한소아치과학회지
Journal of Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry ; (4): 460-466, 2021.
Artigo em Coreano | WPRIM | ID: wpr-919897
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of the hemostatic agent containing aluminum chloride with hemostatic agent containing ferric sulfate on the shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement(RMGIC) to dentin in primary tooth.Twenty extracted non-carious human primary teeth were collected in this study. The specimens were cut to expose dentin and polished. The specimens were randomly seperated into 3 groups for treatment; group I polyacrylic acid(PAA), RMGIC; group II aluminum chloride, PAA, RMGIC; group III ferric sulfate, PAA, RMGICTen specimens from each group were subjected to shear bond strength test. The mean shear bond strength of each group was as follows 10.07 ± 1.83 MPa in Group I, 7.62 ± 0.78 MPA in group II, 5.23 ± 0.78 MPa in group III. There were significant differences among all groups(p In conclusion, both aluminum chloride hemostatic agent and ferric sulfate hemostatic agent decreased the shear bond strength of RMGIC to dentin. And ferric sulfate hemostatic agent decreased the shear bond strength of RMGIC more than the aluminium chloride hemostatic agent.
Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Coreano Revista: Journal of Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Artigo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Coreano Revista: Journal of Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Artigo