Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical significance of prognostic serum marker expression in older adult patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy / 中国基层医药
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy ; (12): 340-345, 2022.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-931619
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To investigate the clinical significance of prognostic serum marker expression in older adult patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE).

Methods:

The clinical data of 79 older adult patients with SAE who received treatment in The Second People's Hospital of Hefei from June 2019 to February 2021 (study group) and 121 sepsis patients without encephalopathy concurrently (control group) were retrospectively analyzed. The indexes with statistically significant difference between the two groups were subjected to multivariate binary logistic regression. Survival curve was plotted.

Results:

There were no significant differences in neuron specific enolase [NSE, (10.69 ± 4.31) μg/L vs. (24.84 ± 3.28) μg/L, t = 26.25, P < 0.01], S100β [(0.25 ± 0.06) μg/L vs. (0.53 ± 0.09) μg/L, t = 22.45, P < 0.01], monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 [MCP-1, (99.33 ± 4.87) ng/L vs. (179.99 ± 6.02) ng/L, t = 99.94, P < 0.01], malondialdehyde [MDA, (4.22 ± 0.08) nmol/L vs. (6.78 ± 0.11) nmol/L, t = 33.76, P < 0.01], glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP, (0.21±0.08) μg/L vs. (2.03 ± 0.47) μg/L, t = 33.76, P < 0.01], procalcitonin [(7.04 ± 2.50) ng/L vs. (16.23 ± 2.48) ng/L, t = 25.47, P < 0.01], interleukin-6 [(29.91 ± 4.51) ng/L vs. (69.22 ± 6.79) ng/L, t = 45.51, P < 0.01], Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score [(18.33 ± 2.12) points vs. (28.89 ± 5.09) points, t = 17.53, P < 0.01], and sequential organ failure assessment score [(7.69 ± 1.50) points vs. (14.05 ± 1.55) points, t = 28.92, P < 0.01] between the control and study groups. N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide was (868.38 ± 25.28) ng/L and (1 037.19 ± 25.34) ng/L in the control and study groups, respectively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that NSE, MCP-1, MDA, and GFAP were the independent risk factors for developing SAE in older adults (NSE t = 8.42, P < 0.01; MCP-1 t = 4.16, P < 0.01; MDA t = 18.4, P < 0.01; GFAP t = 2.88, P < 0.01). The survival curve indicated that survival rate was significantly lower in the study group than in the control group.

Conclusion:

NSE, MCP-1, MDA, and GFAP are independent risk factors for developing SAE in older adults.

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Tipo de estudo: Estudo prognóstico / Fatores de risco Idioma: Chinês Revista: Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Artigo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Tipo de estudo: Estudo prognóstico / Fatores de risco Idioma: Chinês Revista: Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Artigo