Complexity of coronary artery lesions on the effect of minimally invasive or conventional bypass surgery based on SYNTAX score / 中华胸心血管外科杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective:To investigate the influence of the complexity of coronary artery disease based on SYNTAX score(SS) on the effect of minimally invasive or conventional bypass surgery.Methods:From January 2017 to January 2020, the medical group of the Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery Center of Beijing Anzhen Hospital received a total of 760 patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting(OPCABG) surgery, including 596 males and 164 females. 28-85 years old, with an average of(60.88±9.36) years old. 379 cases underwent minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting(MICS CABG)(minimally invasive group) and 381 cases underwent median thoracotomy CABG(conventional group). In this study, according to the SS, patients of both groups were divided into 3 levels, and then the perioperative data of the two sets of high, medium, and low score intervals were compared respectively, and a preliminary analysis of the perioperative data for patients in each SS score section was performed.Results:There was no significant difference in the SS value between the minimally invasive group and the conventional group in the three intervals. There was no statistical difference in preoperative data including age, sex ratio, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, abnormal head CT history, lung disease, history of tobacco and alcohol. The number of minimally invasive bypasses in the three groups was significantly less than that of the conventional group. The duration of minimally invasive surgery in the SS low score group was similar to that of conventional surgery, and the duration of minimally invasive surgery in the SS medium and high score group was longer than that in the conventional group. The hospital stay in the SS low and middle score group was less than that of the conventional group. There was no statistical difference in the proportion of MACCE and auxiliary equipment implantation in the 30-day perioperative period.Conclusion:In the same grade of SS group, there is no significant difference on the perioperative clinical effect between conventional CABG or MICS CABG group. The complexity of coronary artery disease is not the decisive basis for choosing minimally invasive or conventional bypass.