Analysis of the quality status of M.D and S.M.D dissertations in a university / 中华医学教育探索杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective:To further improve the quality of doctoral dissertations in clinical medicine and stomatology.Methods:Taking the 1 122 experts' comments on the 2016-2018 clinical/stomatological doctoral dissertations of a university, the paper made a statistical analysis from such aspects as the source of topic selection, the type of topic selection, the literature review, paper innovation, writing standards, etc. SPSS 20.0 was used for statistical analysis.Results:The results showed that 61.0% (614/1006) dissertations were selected from applied research and 30% (302/1006) from non project research; 83.9% (941/1122) dissertations were evaluated as good and excellent, and the first three items with poor evaluation were: innovation (3.3%, 37/1122), content (2.2%, 25/1122) and writing standard (0.9%, 10/1122).Conclusion:It is suggested that the school and tutors should make clear the training orientation of clinical/stomatological doctoral graduate students, strengthen the training of their scientific research ability and thesis writing ability, and pay attention to clinical practice training without reducing their academic requirements.