Efficacy and urodynamic analysis of robot assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse / 中华泌尿外科杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective:To explore the efficacy and safety of robot assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.Methods:The data of 16 patients who underwent robot assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in Beijing Hospital from September 2019 to May 2022 were collected. The average age was (73.5±9.3) years, the preoperative course was 4-240 months, the body mass index was (24.2±1.7) kg/m 2, the number of births was (1.7±0.8), and the quantitative index of pelvic organ prolapse (POP-Q) was grade Ⅲ -Ⅳ. The maximum urine flow rate before operation was (9.6±3.4) ml/s, the maximum detrusor pressure during urination was 26 (20, 32) cmH 2O, the first sense urine volume of the bladder was (119.1±39.4) ml, the first sense urine urgency volume of the bladder was (253.6±75.7) ml, the maximum bladder pressure capacity was (406.0±79.8) ml, and the residual urine volume was 10 (10, 28) ml. The preoperative PFDI-20 score was 100 (70, 122) and the PFIQ-7 score was 107 (90, 160). During the robot assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, the right area of the sacral promontory was exposed, the anterior and posterior walls of the uterus were separated, and the 2 cm small hole was separated from the right broad ligament of the uterus. The mesh was cut into a "Y" shape and passed through the small hole. The anterior and posterior leaves of the Y-shaped mesh were sutured to fix the cervix, and the other end was fixed to the anterior longitudinal ligament of the sacrum. The operation time and intraoperative bleeding were observed. The effect of surgery was evaluated by preoperative and postoperative urodynamic imaging, POP-Q stage, PFDI-20 score and PFIQ -7 score. Results:All the 16 operations were successfully completed. No injury of urethra, bladder, rectum, important blood vessels and nerves occurred during the operation. The average operation time was (255.6±56.0) min, and the average amount of bleeding was (28.8±18.2) ml. There was no inhibitory contraction wave in 7 patients (44%) before operation, suggesting that there was detrusor overactivity. After operation, the detrusor overactivity disappeared or significantly decreased in 7 patients. The postoperative follow-up period was 3-36 months. During the follow-up period, one patient had recurrence, and the rest had no prolapse and urination problems. The POP-Q stage was reduced to grade 0-Ⅰ after the operation. The subjective satisfaction rate of patients was 94%. The PFDI-20 score [13(8, 24)] and PFIQ -7 score [11(6, 15)] after operation were significantly reduced ( P<0.001), the initial urgent volume of bladder (272.5±88.5) ml was significantly increased compared with that before operation ( P=0.038), and the maximum volume of bladder (427.2±79.2) ml was significantly increased compared with that before operation ( P=0.006). Image urodynamics showed that the patient basically recovered the pelvic floor anatomy and achieved functional reduction. Conclusions:Robot assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy has good subjective and objective effects in POP, low recurrence rate and less complications. It needs a larger sample size study for confirming the improvement of bladder function.