Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of sacral neuromodulation system with new six-contact points electrode for the treatment of bladder dysfunction / 中华泌尿外科杂志
Chinese Journal of Urology ; (12): 681-685, 2022.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-957455
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To investigate the effects of sacral neuromodulation (SNM)using the new six-contact electrode vs. the four-contact electrode in patients with refractory overactive bladder.

Methods:

The clinical data of 29 patients underwent SNM testing therapy from January 2018 to January 2020 in China Rehabilitation Research Center were reviewed. In six-contact points electrode group 16 patients accepted SNM with new six-contact points electrode, while 13 patients in four-contact points electrode group accepted SNM with four-contact points electrode. There were no significant differences between the two group in age [(51.63±4.67) vs. (51.85±7.18) years], gender (male/female, 4/12 and 5/8), urination frequency [(22.10±9.05) vs. (21.79±8.05) times/24h], mean voided volume [(135.68±56.98) vs. (131.00±53.05) ml], and urgency score [(2.78±0.97) vs. (3.02±0.91)] (all P>0.05). The number of sensitive contact points, the ratio of reaction contact points, operation time of stage I and the success rate of two groups were calculated.

Results:

The mean number of sensitive points of six-contact points electrode group (3.31± 0.95) was significantly higher than that of the four-contact points electrode group (1.85± 0.38), ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the ratio of reaction contact points [ (96.87±6.71)% vs. (96.15± 9.39)%] and operation time of stage I [(71.25± 18.21)min vs.(68.85± 10.83)min]between six-contact points electrode group and four-contact points electrode group ( P<0.05). The contact E4 and E5 of six-contact electrodes had similar reaction voltage ( P>0.05). The implant rate of six-contact points electrode group was (14/16, 87.5%), which was higher than that of four-contact points electrode group (10/13, 76.9%), but there was no statistical difference ( P>0.05).

Conclusions:

This study showed that six-contact electrodes has more sensitive points compared with four-contact electrodes. Application of six contact electrodes, patients might get a higher implant rate.

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Chinês Revista: Chinese Journal of Urology Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Artigo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Chinês Revista: Chinese Journal of Urology Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Artigo