MOBILE- VS. FIXED-BEARING TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY / Мэс засал

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The theory that usingmobile bearing (MB) design for total kneereplacementsurgeries can reduce the riskof tibial component loosening compared tofixed-bearing (FB) designs is still unclear.Arthroplastic surgeries developed rapidlywithin recent 10 years, but there is no similarstudy performed yet. This randomized studyinvestigated the impact of prosthesis design toloosening of components at 2 years for totalknee replacement surgeries.Materials and Methods: 479 patientswho underwent total knee arthroplastyin FirstCentral Hospital of Mongolia were allocated toeither FB or MB tibialarticulation.We comparedour results to similar studies which performedabroad due to there is no such a studyperformed before in Mongolia.Results: There is no significant differenceby age, sex, weight, height, body mass index,operation side (right or left) in both groups.Pre- and postoperative range of motionwasalmostsame for MB and FB groups.Butloosening complication was higher for the FBgroup (1.16%) than MB group (0%).Conclusion: Using MB design for total kneearthroplasty has less loosening complicationthan using FB design in Mongolians. Bonemineral density (dual energy absorptiometry)and radiostereometric analysis are necessaryfor widening studies in field of total kneereplacement surgeries in the future.