Application of daily target list of patients with mechanical ventilation in ICU in multidisciplinary ward round / 中国实用护理杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective:To explore the clinical effect of daily target list of ICU patients with mechanical ventilation (hereinafter referred to as target list) for patients with mechanical ventilation in ICU based on multidisciplinary ward round design.Methods:A non contemporaneous controlled study with a quasi experimental design was conducted. One thousand and seventy-one patients with mechanical ventilation admitted to the comprehensive care unit of the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Zhejiang University from January to December 2019 were selected as the experimental group. The target list was used to standardize the communication of multidisciplinary ward rounds and guide the clinical nursing process. Nine hundred and fifty patients with mechanical ventilation admitted from January to December 2018 were selected as the control group. Routine medical communication, ward rounds and nursing shift handover were used. The duration of mechanical ventilation and the length of stay in ICU, the utilization rate of catheter and related infection rate, the implementation rate of daily nursing measures, the incidence of nursing adverse events and the satisfaction of medical staff with multidisciplinary cooperation were compared.Results:Before the intervention, there was no significant difference in the basic data between the two groups ( P>0.05). After the intervention, the duration of mechanical ventilation and the length of stay in ICU were 4 (2, 9) h and 3 (3, 7) d in the experimental group, which were lower than those in the control group 6 (5, 35) h and 4 (3, 8) d, the differences were statistically significant ( Z=-13.76, -3.62, both P<0.01). The standard rate of sedation, the implementation rate of early activities and the implementation rate of venous thromboembolism preventive measures in the experimental group were 83.10% (4 435/5 337), 80.16% (3 155/3 936) and 93.97% (5 530/5 885) respectively, which were higher than the 81.42% (4 190/5 146), 68.83% (2 197/3 192) and 87.86% (5 839/6 646) in the control group, the differences were statistically significant( χ2=5.05, 120.93, 138.50, all P<0.05). The use rate of physical restraint, the incidence of incontinence-associated dermatitis, medical adhesive related skin injury, deep vein thrombosis and delirium in the experimental group were 39.75% (2 936/7 387), 3.64% (39/1 071), 4.11% (44/1 071), 5.23% (56/1 071), 6.54% (70/1 071), which were lower than the 43.50% (3 180/7 312), 5.90% (56/950), 8.53% (81/950), 9.26% (88/950), 12.42% (118 / 950) in the control group, the differences were statistically significant( χ2 values were 5.71-20.67, all P<0.05). The level of multidisciplinary cooperation was greatly improved, 3.83 ± 0.38 vs. 3.61 ± 0.51 ( t=-3.33, P<0.01). Conclusions:The use of target list can improve the implementation rate of treatment and nursing measures for critical patients, improve the level of multidisciplinary cooperation and team satisfaction, reduce the ICU hospitalization time, mechanical ventilation time, the incidence of nursing adverse events, and improve patient safety.