Research on quality improvement based on action research study to reduce unplanned interruption during continuous renal replacement therapy / 中国实用护理杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective:To explore the effect of quality improvement based on action research study to reduce unplanned interruption during continuous renal replacement therapy.Methods:From June 2020 to December 2021, 175 patients who were treated CRRT in SICU of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University were selected as research objects. The objects were divided into control group, observation group 1 and observation group 2 according to the time of admission. Routine nursing was used in the control group (55 cases), the first cycle of plan-action-observation-reflection according to the problems of unplanned interruption was used in the observation group 1(62 cases), the quality improvement was carried out on the basis of the first cycle, and then formulated the second cycle used in the observation group 2(58 cases). The incidence of unplanned interruption of CRRT, the duration of hemofiltration line and the ability of nurses to prevent unplanned interruption of CRRT were compared before and after implementation.Results:The baseline data of CRRT patients in the three groups were comparable ( P>0.05). After cycle quality improvement, the alarm frequencies of unplanned interruption in the observation group 1 and 2 was (8.87 ± 2.66) times and (8.07 ± 2.80) times respectively, which was significant lower than the (12.04 ± 4.23) times in the control group ( t = 3.17 and 3.97, both P<0.01). The cases of coagulation filter≥Ⅱ in the observation group 1 and 2 were 25 cases and 20 cases, which were significant lower than the 32 cases in the control group ( χ2 = 3.72, 6.38, both P<0.05). The duration of blood purification line use was (15.04 ± 7.51) h and (18.16 ± 7.67) h in the observation group 1 and 2, which were significant better than the (11.75 ± 6.84) h in the control group ( t = 3.29 and 6.41, both P<0.01). The ability of nurse to prevent unplanned interruption of CRRT in the control group, the observation group 1 and 2 were (72.62 ± 6.03), (84.77 ± 5.59) and (89.64 ± 4.54), the difference was sigaificant ( F = 146.97, P<0.001). Conclusions:The application of action research study in CRRT quality improvement could reduce the occurrence of unplanned interruption of CRRT and related complications, prolong the use time of hemofiltration line, improve the therapeutic effect of CRRT, improve the quality of nursing, and is worthy of clinical promotion.