Effect of dwell time deviation constraint on the three-dimensional brachytherapy plans for cervical cancer / 中华放射肿瘤学杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective:To investigate the effect of dwell time deviation constraint of inverse optimization on the quality and position error robustness of three-dimensional (3D) brachytherapy plans for cervical cancer.Methods:A total of 20 patients with cervical cancer receiving 3D brachytherapy treatment in Xiangya Hospital Central South University from August 2020 to August 2021 were retrospectively selected. All plans were designed using the Eclipse treatment planning system, and the dwell time deviation constraint parameter smooth value in the system were set to 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00, respectively. An inverse dose volume optimization algorithm was used to generate plans with various smooth values, and the optimization conditions were the same as the original clinical plans. Key dosimetric metrics and total dwell time differences were comparatively analyzed. The applicators were intentionally subjected to position errors (0.2-1.0 cm) in 6 directions (left-right, anterior-posterior, head-foot), and the effect of various smooth values on plan quality and robustness was assessed. There were 133 plans per case and 2 660 plans for 20 patients. The results were statistically analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank nonparametric test.Results:As the smooth value was increased, the modulation factor was gradually decreased and the D 2 cm3 of the bladder and rectum was increased. Plans with smooth values of 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00 had modulation factors of 0.72±0.09, 0.63±0.08, 0.55±0.08, 0.51±0.06, respectively, lower than 0.75±0.05 of the plan with the smooth value of 0.00, and all differences were statistically significant ( P=0.004, 0.002, 0.002, 0.002). The bladder D 2 cm3 of plans with smooth values of 0.50, 0.75, 1.00 were (475.4±41.0) cGy, (483.7±46.2) cGy, and (489.0±46.8) cGy, respectively, higher than (469.8±41.8) cGy of the plan with the smooth value of 0.00, with statistically significant differences (all P=0.002). The rectum D 2 cm3 of plans with smooth values of 0.50 and 0.75 plans were (413.2±93.3) cGy and (418.6±96.4) cGy, both higher than (410.2±91.5) cGy of the plan with the smooth value of 0.00, with statistically significant differences ( P=0.006, 0.010). When positional errors were introduced, the high risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) D 90% was close for different smooth plans at most positional errors, and the differences were not statistically significant. The organs at risk D 2 cm3 of plans with the smooth value of 0.00 was lower than those of plans with other smooth values, and for the bladder and rectum, the differences were statistically significant at most positional errors (all P<0.01). Conclusions:The dwell time deviation constraint parameter exerts significant effect on the plan quality, and the smaller the value of the constraint parameter, the higher quality of the plan. The dwell time deviation constraint parameter has slight impact on the positional error robustness of dosimetric indices of targets and key organs at risk.