Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lung protective effect of driving pressure-guided lung protective ventilation strategy combined with pressure-controlled ventilation in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer / 肿瘤研究与临床
Cancer Research and Clinic ; (6): 881-885, 2022.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-996163
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To investigate the lung protective effect of driving pressure-guided lung protective ventilation strategy (LPVS) combined with pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer.

Methods:

One hundred elderly patients scheduled for thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer from April 2021 to April 2022 in the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University were selected. Patients were aged 60-80 years old and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification Ⅰ-Ⅱ. All patients were divided into 4 groups by using the random number table method, with 25 cases in each group. Group A received volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) + 5 cm H 2O (1 cm H 2O = 0.098 kPa) PEEP, group B received PCV+5 cm H 2O PEEP, group C received VCV+driving pressure-guided individualized PEEP, and group D received PCV+driving pressure-guided individualized PEEP. The arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO 2) was recorded before one-lung ventilation (OLV) (T 0), 30 min after OLV (T 1) and 60 min after OLV (T 2). The serum concentrations of neutrophil elastase (NE) in radial artery blood samples of patients were measured at T 0 and 10 min after the end of OLV (T 3). The occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) within 5 d after surgery was recorded.

Results:

The PaO 2 of group A and B at T 1 [(135±50), (146±51) mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa)] and T 2 [(137±46), (143±47) mmHg] were lower than those of group C and group D at T 1 [(168±27), (190±30) mmHg] and T 2 [(180±30), (183±24) mmHg] (all P < 0.05). The incidence of PPC within 5 d after surgery in group A was higher than that in group D [36% (9/25) vs. 4% (1/25)] ( P = 0.005). The concentration of NE at T 3 in group A [(202.8±9.7) ng/ml] was lower than that in group B, C and D [(182.5±12.0), (180.0±10.3), (160.6±13.0) ng/ml] ( P < 0.05).

Conclusions:

During OLV, driving pressure-guided LPVS combined with PCV can not only improve oxygenation, but also show obvious advantages in reducing inflammatory response. It is a safe and effective intraoperative ventilation strategy for elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer.

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Chinês Revista: Cancer Research and Clinic Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Artigo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Chinês Revista: Cancer Research and Clinic Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Artigo