Effects of dexmedetomidine on intestinal stress response and cellular immune function in patients with gynecologic malignancies undergoing laparoscopic surgery / 肿瘤研究与临床

ABSTRACT

Objective:To explore the effects of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on intestinal stress response and cellular immune function in patients with gynecologic malignancies undergoing laparoscopic surgery.Methods:A total of 60 patients with gynecologic malignancies who scheduled to undergo laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia in the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from March 2021 to March 2022 were selected. All patients were divided into the DEX group and the control group according to the random number table method, with 30 cases in each group. The DEX group included 12 cases of cervical cancer, 10 cases of endometrial cancer and 8 cases of ovarian cancer; the control group included 14 cases of cervical cancer, 9 cases of endometrial cancer and 7 cases of ovarian cancer. The DEX group intravenous anesthesia was induced with a dose of DEX 0.5 μg/kg (infusion was completed within 10 min), general anesthesia was maintained with DEX 0.2 μg·kg -1·h -1 pumped intravenously, and the drug was stopped 30 min before surgery. The control group equal amount of 0.9% sodium chloride solution was pumped intravenously. The venous blood was drawn at the time points of 10 min before general anesthesia (T 0), at the end of operation (T 1) and 1 d after the operation (T 2) to detect the stress response indicators such as cortisol (COR), epinephrine (E), norepinephrine (NE) levels, and immune indicators such as CD4 +, CD8 + proportions and CD4 +/CD8 + at T 0, T 1,and T 2. In addition, the pneumoperitoneum time, general anesthesia time, operation time and intestinal function recovery time were recorded. Results:At T 0, there were no statistically significant differences in the levels of COR, E and NE between the DEX group and the control group (all P > 0.05). At T 1, the levels of COR, E and NE were (146±12) μg/L, (158±14) ng/L, (265±12) ng/L, respectively in the control group, and (136±18) μg/L, (149±15) ng/L, (158±12) ng/L, respectively in the DEX group; the levels of COR, E and NE in the DEX group were lower than those in the control group ( t values were -2.51, -2.37, -2.08, all P < 0.05). At T 2, the levels of COR, E and NE were (124±12) μg/L, (131±16) ng/L, (234±8) ng/L, respectively in the control group, and (116±15) μg/L, (123±12) ng/L, (228±10) ng/L, respectively in the DEX group; the levels of COR, E and NE in the DEX group were also lower than those in the control group ( t values were -2.35, -2.23, -2.17, all P < 0.05). At T 0, there were no statistically significant differences in the proportions of CD4 +, CD8 + and CD4 +/CD8 + between the DEX group and the control group (all P > 0.05). At T 1, the proportions of CD4 +, CD8 + and CD4 +/CD8 + were (23±3)%, (20±3)%, 1.12±0.16, respectively in the control group, and (27±4)%, (23±4)%,1.22±0.19, respectively in the DEX group; the proportions of CD4 +, CD8 + and CD4 +/CD8 + in the DEX group were higher than those in the control group ( t values were -3.43, -2.29, 2.13, all P < 0.05). At T 2, the proportions of CD4 +, CD8 + and CD4 +/CD8 + were (26±3)%, (23±4)%, 1.17±0.16, respectively in the control group, and (31±5)%, (25±4)%, 1.26±0.19, respectively in the DEX group; the proportions of CD4 +, CD8 + and CD4 +/CD8 + in the DEX group were higher than those in the control group ( t values were -4.32, -2.02, 2.02, all P < 0.05). In addition, the time of first exhaust in the DEX group was shorter than that in the control group ( P<0.05). Conclusions:DEX can reduce the intestinal stress response of gynecologic malignancies patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, thereby improving the immunosuppression of patients. It is also of great significance to protect intestinal mucosal barrier and recover the intestinal function, and DEX has a high safety.