ABSTRACT
Background: Pts with previously treated R/R aggressive LBCL have compromised health-related QOL (HRQOL). Liso-cel is an autologous, CD19-directed, defined composition, 4-1BB CAR T cell product administered at equal target doses of CD8 + and CD4 + CAR + T cells. In a prespecified interim analysis of TRANSFORM (NCT03575351), a randomized, open-label, pivotal trial, liso-cel demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in the primary endpoint of event-free survival and key secondary endpoints (complete response rate and progression-free survival) in adults with R/R LBCL after failure of first-line (1L) immunochemotherapy compared with SOC, with no new safety signals. Here we present results of the pt-reported outcomes (PRO) analysis from TRANSFORM. Methods: Adults (age ≤ 75 yrs) with R/R LBCL (≤ 12 mo after 1L therapy), who were eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), were randomized to receive either SOC (3 cycles of salvage chemotherapy [CT] and BEAM + ASCT for responding pts) or liso-cel after lymphodepletion. Crossover to receive liso-cel was allowed in the SOC arm for pts who failed treatment. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - 30 items (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma Subscale (FACT-LymS) were administered at randomization (baseline) and on Days 29 (infusion of liso-cel or 2 cycles of salvage CT), 64 (1 mo post liso-cel or completion of CT), 126 (3 mos post liso-cel or 2 mos post ASCT), and Mo 6 and other prespecified timepoints up to Mo 36 or end of study. No PRO data were collected after crossover. The analysis was based on the PRO-evaluable population (pts with a baseline and ≥ 1 post-baseline assessment). Predefined thresholds determined clinically meaningful changes. Global health/QOL (GH/QOL), physical functioning, cognitive functioning, fatigue, pain, and FACT-LymS were the primary domains of interest based on their relevance to the study population and treatment. A linear mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis was performed to assess the between-treatment difference in overall least squares (LS) mean change from baseline for each primary domain, using data collected up to Day 126 for visits with a sample size per arm ≥ 10. Proportions of pts with meaningful change from baseline were assessed for each primary domain up to Mo 6. All analyses were descriptive only. Results: Of 184 randomized pts, 90 (49%) and 85 (46%), respectively, were included in the PRO-evaluable population for the EORTC QLQ-C30 (SOC vs liso-cel n=43 vs 47) and FACT-LymS (n=40 vs 45, respectively). The PRO assessment completion rate from baseline up to Mo 6 was ≥ 45%, which was lower than expected primarily due to operational challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic but was comparable for both arms. In the MMRM analysis, the liso-cel arm had more favorable overall LS mean changes from baseline to Day 126 than the SOC arm in most of the EORTC QLQ-C30 domains and FACT-LymS. In particular, the between-treatment differences for cognitive functioning (−2.09 vs 2.21) and fatigue (3.75 vs −1.95) for SOC versus liso-cel, respectively, exceeded the prespecified minimal important difference threshold (Table);in those domains, the SOC arm deteriorated while the liso-cel arm improved. In individual-level analyses, the proportion of pts with meaningful improvement for fatigue and GH/QOL was higher, while deterioration was lower, in the liso-cel arm versus SOC arm from baseline up to Mo 6 (Figure). At Mo 6, a higher proportion of pts experienced worsened fatigue (71% vs 18%) and a lower proportion experienced improved fatigue (29% vs 47%) in the SOC arm compared with the liso-cel arm;for GH/QOL, a higher proportion of pts worsened (57% vs 18%) and lower proportion improved (14% vs 53%), respectively. For the other primary domains, the proportions of pts with improvement or deterioration favored liso-cel or were similar between arms. Conclusions: Compared with SOC, liso-cel sh wed favorable improvement in most primary PRO domains, particularly EORTC QLQ-C30 cognitive functioning and fatigue and more pts showed PRO improvements and fewer showed deterioration by Mo 6 with liso-cel. The results were achieved despite only responders remaining in the SOC arm after salvage CT. HRQOL was either improved or maintained after liso-cel treatment in pts with R/R LBCL after failure of 1L therapy. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Abramson: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Consultancy, Research Funding;Morphosys: Consultancy;C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy;Kite Pharma: Consultancy;Kymera: Consultancy;Incyte Corporation: Consultancy;Bluebird Bio: Consultancy;Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy;Allogene Therapeutics: Consultancy;Novartis: Consultancy;EMD Serono: Consultancy;Genmab: Consultancy;Seagen Inc.: Research Funding;AbbVie: Consultancy;Karyopharm: Consultancy;Genentech: Consultancy;BeiGene: Consultancy. Arnason: Juno/BMS: Honoraria. Glass: BMS: Consultancy;Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Riemser: Research Funding;Kite: Consultancy;Novartis: Consultancy;Helios Klinik Berlin-Buch: Current Employment. Crotta: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Montheard: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Previtali: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Liu: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Braverman: BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Guo: Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy;UCB: Consultancy;Janssen: Consultancy;Gilead: Consultancy;Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy;EMD Serono: Consultancy;Evidera: Current Employment. Shi: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Kamdar: ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy;Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy;TG Therapeutics: Research Funding;Genentech: Research Funding;AbbVie: Consultancy;KaryoPharm: Consultancy;Kite: Consultancy;AstraZeneca: Consultancy;SeaGen: Speakers Bureau;Celgene: Other;Genetech: Other;Celgene (BMS): Consultancy.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Patients (pts) with primary refractory or relapsed high-grade lymphoma (HGL) including Burkitt lymphoma (BL) and high-grade B-cell lymphoma with rearrangements of MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 (double-hit lymphoma, DHL) have a dismal prognosis with patients almost never achieving a meaningful remission to second line therapy. No standard second line therapeutic approach exists, particularly for BL. The characteristic hallmark of these diseases is a dysregulated MYC oncogene with both downstream effects on proliferation and a high metabolic fluxes which use tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle intermediates as biosynthetic precursors. CPI-613 (devimistat) is a non-redox active analogue of lipoic acid, a required cofactor for two key mitochondrial enzymes of the TCA cycle, pyruvate dehydrogenase and alpha ketoglutarate dehydrogenase. Disruption of mitochondrial function by CPI-613 results in a shutdown of ATP and biosynthetic-intermediate production, leading to cancer cell death by apoptosis or necrosis. In the initial phase I trial (n=26) one patient with multiply refractory BL had a partial remission sustained for over one year and then consolidated by surgical resection. She remains alive 7 years later. As of July 2021, 20 clinical studies for various cancers have been conducted (ongoing/completed) with devimistat with over 700 patients having received study drug. We initiated a phase II trial to further explore efficacy in HGL. Devimistat has FDA orphan status for BL and 4 other cancers. Methods: NCT03793140 is a multicenter study aiming to enroll 17 patients on each of two cohorts, BL and DHL, with a Simon's 2-stage design for each cohort, requiring one response among the first 9 treated patients to expand to 17. Patients must have had at least one prior line of therapy or are refusing standard of care and must be more than 3 months after a prior stem cell transplant. Active central nervous system (CNS) parenchymal disease is excluded, but prior leptomeningeal disease is allowed if the CSF is negative for more than 4 weeks at enrollment and maintenance intrathecal therapy is ongoing. Devimistat is given by central line over 2 hours daily x 5 days for two 14-day cycles and then as maintenance x5 days every 21 days. Pts were evaluable for response if they received at least 4 infusions over 5 days of the first cycle. Results: 9 pts were enrolled in the DHL/THL arm. Mediannumber of prior therapies were 3 (range, 1-6). No responses were seen, with only 1 patient achieving stable disease as best response, resulting in cohort closure. Thus far, 8 BL pts were enrolled. Median number of prior therapies was 3 (range, 2-4). Two patients were inevaluable for response. 1/6 patients had stable disease through cycle 7 and one had a complete response (CR). This CR patient (HIV+) with 4 prior therapies entered the study with only a biopsy proven thigh mass. He was not a transplant candidate for social reasons. He had a near complete metabolic remission after 4 cycles of devimistat and a CR after cycle 7. (Table and Figure) As of July 2021, he is in cycle 11, having had a 4-week treatment delay of cycle 5 due to CoVID 19 infection. ECOG improved from 3 to 0. Adverse events (AE): As of July30, 2021, no patient experienced a serious adverse event related to study drug. Four patients had grade 3 events at least possibly related: 2 neutropenia, 1 thrombocytopenia and 1 elevated bilirubin. 1 patient had a dose reduction for grade 2 alanine aminotransferase increase. Conclusions: Although our results are preliminary, the complete remission in this patient is promising in a disease where no viable treatment options exist in the relapsed, refractory BL. Enrollment to the BL cohort is ongoing. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Nikolaenko: Pfizer: Research Funding;Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Pardee: Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisor committees;CBM Biopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Karyopharm: Research Funding;Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Abramson: Genentech: Consultancy;Kymera: Consultancy;Karyopharm: Consultancy;AbbVie: Consultancy;Seagen Inc.: Research Funding;Allogene Therapeutics: Consultancy;Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy;Incyte Corporation: Consultancy;BeiGene: Consultancy;Bluebird Bio: Consultancy;Genmab: Consultancy;EMD Serono: Consultancy;Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Consultancy, Research Funding;C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy;Morphosys: Consultancy;Kite Pharma: Consultancy;Novartis: Consultancy. Horwitz: Vividion Therapeutics: Consultancy;Shoreline Biosciences, Inc.: Consultancy;Tubulis: Consultancy;Verastem: Research Funding;ONO Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy;Myeloid Therapeutics: Consultancy;SecuraBio: Consultancy, Research Funding;Trillium Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding;Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding;Millennium /Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding;Kura Oncology: Consultancy;Janssen: Consultancy;Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding;Forty Seven, Inc.: Research Funding;Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding;C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy;Celgene: Research Funding;Aileron: Research Funding;Affimed: Research Funding;Acrotech Biopharma: Consultancy;ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Matasar: GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding;Teva: Consultancy;Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding;Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Merck Sharp & Dohme: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company;F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;IGM Biosciences: Research Funding;Merck: Consultancy;Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy;TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria;Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: Current Employment;Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding;Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy;ImmunoVaccine Technologies: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria;Rocket Medical: Consultancy, Research Funding. Noy: Rafael Parhma: Research Funding;Morphosys: Consultancy;Targeted Oncology: Consultancy;Medscape: Consultancy;Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria;Epizyme: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: CPI-613 (devimistat) is a non-redox active analogue of lipoic acid, a required cofactor for two key mitochondrial enzymes of the TCA cycle, pyruvate dehydrogenase and alpha ketoglutarate dehydrogenase. Disruption of mitochondrial function by CPI-613 results in a shutdown of ATP and biosynthetic-intermediate production, leading to cancer cell death by apoptosis or necrosis
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Patients (pts) with primary refractory or relapsed Burkitt lymphoma/leukemia (BL) or high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements (double hit, DHL) and/or BCL6 (triple hit, THL) have a dismal prognosis. A dysregulated MYC oncogene has downstream effects on proliferation and highly glycolytic metabolism with tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle intermediates as biosynthetic precursors. Devimistat is a non-redox active analogue of lipoic acid, a required cofactor for two key TCA cycle mitochondrial enzymes: pyruvate dehydrogenase and alpha ketoglutarate dehydrogenase. Disruption results in a shutdown of ATP and biosyntheticintermediate production leading to cancer cell death. In a phase I trial (n = 26) a pt with multiply refractory BL had a partial remission sustained over one year prior to resection. She remains in remission 7 years later. As of March 2021, 20 clinical studies in over 700 pts with various cancers have been conducted (ongoing/completed) with devimistat. We initiated a phase II trial to further explore efficacy. Methods: NCT03793140 is a multicenter study enrolling 17 patients on each of two cohorts BL or DHL/THL. Pts must have had one prior therapy or are refusing standard of care, measurable disease or isolated bone marrow involvement, and must not be within 3 months of a prior stem cell transplant. Active central nervous system (CNS) parenchymal disease is excluded, but leptomeningeal disease is allowed if the CSF is negative for more than 4 weeks and the maintenance intrathecal/intraOmmaya therapy is ongoing. Devimistat is given by central line over 2 hours daily x 5 days for two 14-day cycles and then as maintenance every 21 days. Pts are evaluable for response if they receive at least 4/5 days of the first cycle. At least 1response in the first 9 pts by cycle 3 was needed to expand to 17 pts in total in that cohort. Results: 9 pts were enrolled in the DHL/THL arm. Number of prior therapies was 3(1-6). No responses and only 1 stable disease resulted in cohort closure. Thus far, 8 BL pts were enrolled. Number of prior therapies was 3 (2-4). 2 pts were inevaluable. 1/6 pts had a response. This HIV+ pt had a thigh mass having received 4 prior therapies. He had a near complete metabolic remission after 3 cycles of devimistat. PET/CT assessment: Thigh lesion baseline October 19, 2020: 10.8 x 6.5 cm SUV 24. After cycle 3: unmeasurable, SUV 2. He is currently in cycle 7, having had a 4-week treatment delay of cycle 5 due to CoVID 19 infection. ECOG improved from 3 to 0. Adverse events (AE): As of March 03, 2021, no serious AEs related to study drug. 4 pts had grade 3 events at least possibly related: 2 neutropenia, 1 thrombocytopenia and 1 elevated bilirubin. 1 patient had a dose reduction for grade 2 alanine aminotransferase increase. Conclusions: Although our results are preliminary, the near complete remission in this patient is promising in a disease where no viable treatment options exist.