Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Add filters

Document Type
Year range
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ; 10(5 SUPPL 2), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1916579


Background: Since April 2020, some high schools were closed to in-person teaching, and interscholastic and club sports were cancelled in an attempt to slow the spread of COVID- 19. While some US adolescents participated in sports since April 2020, other US adolescents did not participate in sports during this time. It is unknown what effect sport participation has had on the health of adolescents. Hypothesis/Purpose: To identify how sport participation during the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the health of adolescents. Methods: Adolescents across the US were recruited via social media to complete an online survey in the spring of 2021. Participants were asked to report their demographics (age, gender, race), whether they participated in school club or school sports since May 2020, type of school they attended (in-person, online, hybrid), and measures of mental health (MH), physical activity (PA) and quality of life (QoL). Assessments included the: General Anxiety Disorder-7 Item (GAD-7) for anxiety, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item (PHQ-9) for depression, Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (PFABS) for physical activity, and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 (PedsQL) for quality of life. Assessment scores were compared for respondents who participated in sports (PAR) with those that did not participate in sports (NoPAR). Univariable comparisons between the groups were made via ttests or chi-square tests while means for continuous outcome measures were compared between the groups by ANOVA models that controlled for age, gender, race and the type of school attendance. Results: 4,693 adolescents (52% female, Age = 16.1+1.3 yrs., grades 9-12) from 38 states participated in the study with PAR = 4,286 (91%) and NoPAR = 407 (9%). NoPAR participants reported a higher prevalence of moderate to severe levels of anxiety (29.3% vs 21.3%, p<0.001) and depression (40.7% vs 19.8%, p<0.001). NoPAR participants reported lower (worse) PFABS scores (mean 13.2 [95%CI 12.4, 13.9] vs 21.2 [20.7, 21.6] p<0.001) and lower (worse) PedsQL total scores compared to the PAR group (77.9 [76.5, 79.3] vs. 83.2 [82.3, 84.1], p<0.001). Conclusions: Adolescents who did not play a sport during the COVID-19 pandemic reported significantly higher levels of anxiety and depression, as well as lower physical activity and quality of life scores compared to adolescents who did play a school or club sport. Participation in organized sports may offer an important opportunity to improve physical activity and mental health for adolescents during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Annals of Emergency Medicine ; 78(4):S116, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1748249


Study Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic imposed both constraints and opportunities for innovation in emergency care delivery. Visits to the emergency department (ED) plunged by as much as 42% in the US, resulting in excess morbidity and mortality due to patients deferring or avoiding emergency care. With the declaration of a public health emergency, payors such as Medicare authorized emergency physicians (EPs) to bill for evaluation and management services delivered through telehealth—potentially allowing EPs to project emergency care beyond the four walls of the physical ED. If adopted, the provision of emergency care via telehealth could expand the reach of emergency medicine, not only during a pandemic but also more broadly, and especially as aging populations choose to receive more care at home. Such expansion of emergency care could benefit from perspectives of EPs in terms of the motivations, barriers, and necessary capabilities. Thus, our objectives were to survey and profile EPs to better understand the potential for telehealth in emergency care delivery. Methods: In collaboration with ACEP and the Emergency Medicine Practice Resource Network (EMPRN), we designed a survey instrument comprising of 5 main questions that provided ranked choice selections. The survey was sent electronically to a group of EMPRN volunteers representing EPs from diverse geographic, age, and practice levels. Results: The survey was sent to a total number of 765 participants, of which a total of 140 (18%) responded. In terms of motivations, respondents identified early engagement with the option to escalate care to the ED if necessary (77% ranked as very important or somewhat important). Respondents also identified the opportunity to quickly address non-life-threatening complaints that may not have needed an ED visit (76% ranked as very important or somewhat important). The top two identified barriers ranked as very significant or somewhat significant were the inability to obtain an adequate evaluation of the patient (76%) and a lack of support personnel in patients’ homes to assist with virtual visits (64%). A related series of responses ranked the needed capabilities necessary for supportive personnel to address barriers to telehealth use. (Table 1). Conclusions: This survey is a mechanism to begin understanding EPs’ perceptions and what they would need to feel comfortable to safely provide telehealth services in the ED. The results revealed that EPs recognize certain opportunities in terms of the potential future of telehealth in emergency care delivery. However, specific barriers were identified. This survey suggests that the ability to escalate care and obtain adequate telehealth exams with presenters and diagnostic support will be important for EPs to feel safe delivering telehealth services. [Formula presented]

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society ; 69:S6-S6, 2021.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1194970