ABSTRACT
Importance: COVID-19 vaccination has been associated with various adverse outcomes. Although studies have reported cases of arrhythmia after COVID-19 vaccination, the precise underlying mechanism remains to be elucidated. Objective: Here, we report the case of a patient who developed atrial fibrillation after receiving the mRNA-1273 vaccine and describe our findings in light of relevant cases in the literature. Design Setting and Participants: This is a case report and a review of the relevant literature. A 55-year-old woman presented to our clinic with a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and mild mitral valve prolapse. The patient developed atrial fibrillation 3 days after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. She was diagnosed with moderate-to-severe tricuspid regurgitation and severe mitral regurgitation, and underwent valve repair surgery. To obtain relevant articles (December 2020 through August 2022), we searched the following key words on PubMed: atrial fibrillation and COVID-19 vaccination. Results: A total of 5 relevant case reports were identified. COVID-19 vaccination led to arrhythmia, including atrial fibrillation, within 14 days. Conclusions and Relevance: Cases of patients developing arrhythmia after COVID-19 vaccination have been increasingly reported. Although the underlying mechanism remains unclear, we hypothesize that mRNA vaccination may lead to arrhythmia and associated valve diseases. Thus, before administering mRNA-1273 vaccines to patients with a history of valvular heart disease or atrial fibrillation, the patients' cardiologists must be consulted.
ABSTRACT
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has made it clear that combating coronavirus outbreaks benefits from a combination of vaccines and therapeutics. A promising drug target common to all coronaviruses-including SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2-is the papain-like protease (PLpro). PLpro cleaves part of the viral replicase polyproteins into non-structural protein subunits, which are essential to the viral replication cycle. Additionally, PLpro can cleave both ubiquitin and the ubiquitin-like protein ISG15 from host cell substrates as a mechanism to evade innate immune responses during infection. These roles make PLpro an attractive antiviral drug target. Here we demonstrate that ubiquitin variants (UbVs) can be selected from a phage-displayed library and used to specifically and potently block SARS-CoV-2 PLpro activity. A crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 PLpro in complex with a representative UbV reveals a dimeric UbV bound to PLpro at a site distal to the catalytic site. Yet, the UbV inhibits the essential cleavage activities of the protease in vitro and in cells, and it reduces viral replication in cell culture by almost five orders of magnitude.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ubiquitin , Humans , Ubiquitin/metabolism , Peptide Hydrolases/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , Catalytic Domain , Papain/chemistry , Papain/metabolism , Virus ReplicationABSTRACT
Introduction: Shufeng Jiedu capsule (SFJD) is a commonly used Chinese patent medicine in China. Some studies have reported that SFJD has therapeutic effects in patients diagnosed with COVID-19. This systematic review aimed to critically evaluate the efficacy and safety of SFJD combined with western medicine (WM) for treating COVID-19. Methods: A literature search by using WHO COVID-19 database, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, the Web of Science, CKNI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, and clinical trial registries was conducted, up to 1 August 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, cohort studies and case series of SFJD combined with WM for COVID-19 were included. Literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers in line with the same criteria. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) to assess the certainty of evidence. Meta-analyses were performed with Revman 5.3 if possible. The descriptive analysis was conducted when the studies could not be meta-analyzed. Results: Totally 10 studies with 1,083 patients were included. Their methodological quality were moderate. The results demonstrated that compared to WM group, SFJD + WM group remarkably increased the nucleic acid negative conversion rate (RR = 1.40, 95%CI: 1.07-1.84), total effective rate (RR = 1.18, 95%CI: 1.07-1.31), cure rate (RR = 4.06, 95%CI: 2.19-7.53), and the chest CT improvement rate (RR = 1.19, 95%CI: 1.08-1.31), shorten nucleic acid negative conversion time (MD = -0.70, 95%CI: -1.14 to -0.26), reduced the clinical symptom disappearance time (fever, diarrhea, cough, fatigue, pharyngalgia, nasal congestion, and rhinorrhea), as well as improved the levels of laboratory outcomes (CRP, IL-6, Lym, and Neu). Additionally, the incidence of adverse reactions did not exhibit any statistically significant difference between SFJD + WM group and WM group. Conclusion: SFJD combined with WM seems more effective than WM alone for the treatment of COVID-19. However, more well-designed RCTs still are warranted. Systematic review registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/], identifier [CRD42022306307].
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The successful management of patients infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with inhaled ciclesonide has been reported, however few studies have investigated its application among hospitalized patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled all adult patients admitted to our hospital with confirmed COVID-19 infection from May to June 2021. Critical patients who received mechanical ventilation within 24 h after admission and those who started ciclesonide more than 14 days after symptom onset were excluded. The in-hospital mortality rate was compared between those who did and did not receive inhaled ciclesonide. RESULTS: A total of 269 patients were enrolled, of whom 184 received inhaled ciclesonide and 85 did not. The use of ciclesonide was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (7.6% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.0003) and a trend of shorter hospital stay (12.0 (10.0-18.0) days vs. 13.0 (10.0-25.3) days, p = 0.0577). In subgroup analysis, the use of inhaled ciclesonide significantly reduced mortality in the patients with severe COVID-19 infection (6.8% vs. 50.0%, p < 0.0001) and in those with a high risk of mortality (16.4% vs. 43.2%, p = 0.0037). The use of inhaled ciclesonide also reduced the likelihood of receiving mechanical ventilation in the patients with severe COVID-19 infection. After multivariate analysis, inhaled ciclesonide remained positively correlated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio: 0.2724, 95% confidence interval: 0.087-0.8763, p = 0.0291). CONCLUSIONS: The use of inhaled ciclesonide in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection can reduce in-hospital mortality. Further randomized studies in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 infection are urgently needed.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Pregnenediones , Adult , Hospitalization , Humans , Pregnenediones/therapeutic use , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
This study aimed to examine the role of effective employee training in the sustainable growth and corporate social responsibility of hotels during the postpandemic period. An initial respondent pool was selected using purposive sampling, and 280 questionnaires were finally obtained by snowball sampling from September 2019 to February 2020. The sample was analyzed using basic statistical tests, the Pearson correlation coefficient, and multivariate regression. We then interpreted the sample data through consultation with scholars and practitioners in hotel management. Finally, the data were analyzed using multivariate verification. The results indicated that China Binhai Hotel could not foster consistent employee enthusiasm and fulfill its corporate social responsibilities during the postpandemic period due to deficiencies in its human resources training, employee benefit, job rotation, and incentive systems. We suggest for hotels to promote corporate culture, improve the system of promotion, increase employee benefits, and adjust the workplace environment and equipment provided to employees. These will improve employee attitudes toward hotel management, improve work efficiency, increase retention, and solve the problem of personnel shortage during the postpandemic period.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Organizational Culture , Social Responsibility , Workforce , WorkplaceABSTRACT
The spread of COVID-19 has been exacerbated by the emergence of variants of concern (VoC). Many VoC contain mutations in the spike protein (S-protein) and are implicated in infection and response to therapeutics. Bivalent neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) targeting the S-protein receptor-binding domain (RBD) are promising therapeutics for COVID-19, but they are limited by low potency and vulnerability to RBD mutations in VoC. To address these issues, we used naïve phage-displayed peptide libraries to isolate and optimize 16-residue peptides that bind to the RBD or the N-terminal domain (NTD) of the S-protein. We fused these peptides to the N-terminus of a moderate-affinity nAb to generate tetravalent peptide-IgG fusions, and we showed that both classes of peptides were able to improve affinities for the S-protein trimer by >100-fold (apparent KD < 1 pM). Critically, cell-based infection assays with a panel of six SARS-CoV-2 variants demonstrated that an RBD-binding peptide was able to enhance the neutralization potency of a high-affinity nAb >100-fold. Moreover, this peptide-IgG was able to neutralize variants that were resistant to the same nAb in the bivalent IgG format, including the dominant B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant that is resistant to most clinically approved therapeutic nAbs. To show that this approach is general, we fused the same peptide to a clinically approved nAb drug and showed that it enabled the neutralization of a resistant variant. Taken together, these results establish minimal peptide fusions as a modular means to greatly enhance affinities, potencies, and breadth of coverage of nAbs as therapeutics for SARS-CoV-2.
Subject(s)
Bacteriophages , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral/genetics , Bacteriophages/genetics , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/genetics , Neutralization Tests , Peptide Library , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/geneticsABSTRACT
This study mainly explored the behavioral intention and influencing factors of medical staff toward COVID-19 vaccinations. Medical staff were taken as the research subjects. This study selected 300 research subjects by the intentional sampling method and conducted a questionnaire survey. A total of 260 questionnaires were recovered (a recovery rate of 86%), and the number of valid questionnaires was 212, for an effective questionnaire rate of 81%. SPSS and AMOS were used for statistical analysis. As known from the research results: (1) medical staffs' perception of COVID-19 vaccinations had a positive and significant impact on their behavioral intention for receiving COVID-19 vaccinations; (2) medical staffs' perception of COVID-19 vaccinations had a negative and significant impact on the barriers to receiving COVID-19 vaccinations; (3) medical staffs' motivation of receiving COVID-19 vaccinations had a positive and significant positive effect on their behavioral intention of receiving COVID-19 vaccinations; and (4) medical staffs' motivation of receiving COVID-19 vaccinations had a positive and significant impact on the barrier to receiving COVID-19 vaccinations.
ABSTRACT
Utilizing a large-scale cross-sectional survey, the present study tested the advanced psychometric properties of Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) in specific populations (i.e., primary and middle schoolteachers, and their students). The present study also examined the association between perceived fear of COVID-19 and psychological distress among home-room teachers (i.e., teachers who teach all their students in one classroom all day) and their students. The results among participants (11,134 teachers and 4,335 students) indicated good internal reliability of FCV-19S and excellent factorial validity with a two-factor structure utilizing these specific populations. Furthermore, the multilevel analysis showed that home-room teachers' psychological distress, but not fear of COVID-19, was positively associated with their students. In sum, the FCV-19S is a useful tool to assess the fear of COVID-19 on potentially vulnerable populations (i.e., primary/middle schoolteachers and their students). Future studies are encouraged to use the present study's findings to investigate possible underlying mechanisms for developing effective coping strategies and interventions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12144-021-02471-3.
ABSTRACT
COVID-19 pneumonia is a disease that causes an existential health crisis in many people by directly affecting and damaging lung cells. The segmentation of infected areas from computed tomography (CT) images can be used to assist and provide useful information for COVID-19 diagnosis. Although several deep learning-based segmentation methods have been proposed for COVID-19 segmentation and have achieved state-of-the-art results, the segmentation accuracy is still not high enough (approximately 85%) due to the variations of COVID-19 infected areas (such as shape and size variations) and the similarities between COVID-19 and non-COVID-infected areas. To improve the segmentation accuracy of COVID-19 infected areas, we propose an interactive attention refinement network (Attention RefNet). The interactive attention refinement network can be connected with any segmentation network and trained with the segmentation network in an end-to-end fashion. We propose a skip connection attention module to improve the important features in both segmentation and refinement networks and a seed point module to enhance the important seeds (positions) for interactive refinement. The effectiveness of the proposed method was demonstrated on public datasets (COVID-19CTSeg and MICCAI) and our private multicenter dataset. The segmentation accuracy was improved to more than 90%. We also confirmed the generalizability of the proposed network on our multicenter dataset. The proposed method can still achieve high segmentation accuracy.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Deep Learning , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Databases, Factual , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) posed a major threat to the clinical practice of orthopedic surgeons, especially in the emergency department. We aim to present: (1) the criteria established by the Surgery Management Committee of Taipei Veterans General Hospital in response to COVID-19 and (2) the impact of COVID-19 screening on orthopedic trauma patients in the emergency department. METHODS: From April 1 to April 30, 2020, all orthopedic trauma patients in the emergency department were screened for COVID-19 if they fulfilled any of the following: (1) travel from abroad within 14 days, (2) high-risk occupation, (3) contact or cluster history with a COVID-19-positive patient, and (4) any associated symptom, including fever up to 38°C, cough, sore throat, rhinorrhea, loss of taste or smell, muscle soreness, malaise, or shortness of breath. We recorded details on the injury, fever, management, and associated outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 163 orthopedic trauma patients presenting to the emergency department, 24 were screened for COVID-19; of these, 22 received surgery. Sixty-two patients received surgery without screening for COVID-19. Fever was the most common reason to screen for COVID-19 (N = 20; 83.3%). No patients were COVID-19 positive. Screened patients had a significantly longer mean interval from presentation to the emergency department to surgery (2.7 ± 2.5 vs. 1.5 ± 0.8 days, p = 0.037). Of the 20 patients screened because of fever, the focus was not identified in 12 (60.0%) patients. The other eight had urinary tract infection (N = 6; 27.2%), septic hip (N = 1; 4.6%), and concomitant pneumonia and urinary tract infection (N = 1; 4.6%). The mean duration of fever and hospital stay was 4.3 ± 4.6 and 8.7 ± 4.9 days, respectively. There were no thromboembolic events, surgical complications, or in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: We developed safe and reliable screening criteria for this COVID-19 pandemic. The delay in surgery was reasonable and did not adversely affect in-patient outcomes.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Fractures, Bone , Orthopedics , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Child , Female , Fever , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Taiwan , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Due to the rapid spread of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), policies based on the nature of "spatial distancing" have been implemented and have resulted in school suspensions and online learning among schoolchildren. In order to examine the impact of such policies on schoolchildren, the aims of the present study were to (i) assess changes in the level of engagement in three internet-related activities (smartphone use, social media use, and gaming) before and during the COVID-19 outbreak, including prolonged and problematic engagement in these activities; (ii) investigate the differences of psychological distress before and after COVID-19 outbreak; and (iii) to use structural equation modeling to investigate the mediating roles of problematic internet-related behaviors in the causal relationships of psychological distress and time spent on internet-related activities. METHODS: Self-report measures were used to assess internet-related activities and psychological distress. Time spent on internet-related activities, problematic use of internet-related activities, and psychological distress were collected from primary school students (N = 535; 265 boys; M age = 10.32 years [SD = 0.84]). The data were first collected before the COVID-19 outbreak (i.e., early November 2019) and then collected again during the school suspension due to COVID-19 outbreak (i.e., end of March 2020) for comparisons of changes. RESULTS: Schoolchildren spent significantly more time on the smartphone (increased 1.02 h daily; P < 0.001) and social media (increased 0.73 h daily; P < 0.001) but not gaming (increased 0.14 h daily; P = 0.07) during the school suspension compared to the baseline. Schoolchildren who increased by 15 or 30 min daily on internet-related activities showed an increased level of psychological distress. The association between problematic use of social media and psychological distress was stronger during the school suspension (ß = 0.584) than at the baseline (ß = 0.451; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Increased problematic use of internet-related activities among schoolchildren was associated with greater psychological distress. Parents should therefore monitor internet-related activities and psychological distress of their children to support their mental health.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Internet Addiction Disorder/psychology , Psychological Distress , Social Isolation/psychology , Child , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Quarantine , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and its resulting social policy changes may result in psychological distress among schoolchildren with overweight. This study thus aimed to (1) compare psychological distress (including fear of COVID-19 infection, stress, anxiety, and depression), perceived weight stigma, and problematic internet-related behaviors between schoolchildren with and without overweight; (2) assess whether perceived weight stigma and problematic internet-related behaviors explained psychological distress. METHODS: Schoolchildren (n = 1357; mean age = 10.7 years) with overweight (n = 236) and without overweight (n = 1121) completed an online survey assessing their fear of COVID-19 infection, stress, anxiety, depression, perceived weight stigma, problematic smartphone application use, problematic social media use, and problematic gaming. RESULTS: Schoolchildren with overweight had significantly higher levels of COVID-19 infection fear, stress, depression, perceived weight stigma, and problematic social media use than those without overweight. Regression models showed that perceived weight stigma and problematic internet-related behaviors were significant predictors of psychological distress among schoolchildren with overweight. CONCLUSION: Strategies to manage perceived weight stigma and problematic internet-related behaviors may have a positive influence on mental health among schoolchildren with overweight under health-threatening circumstances, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Internet Use/statistics & numerical data , Overweight , Psychological Distress , Students , Adolescent , Child , China/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Overweight/epidemiology , Overweight/psychology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Students/psychology , Students/statistics & numerical dataSubject(s)
COVID-19 , Measles , Humans , Measles/epidemiology , Measles/prevention & control , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Taiwan/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with cardiovascular comorbidities are at high risk of poor outcome from COVID-19. However, how the burden (number) of vascular risk factors influences the risk of severe COVID-19 disease remains unresolved. Our aim was to investigate the association of severe COVID-19 illness with vascular risk factor burden. METHODS: We included 164 (61.8 ± 13.6 years) patients with COVID-19 in this retrospective study. We compared the difference in clinical characteristics, laboratory findings and chest computed tomography (CT) findings between patients with severe and non-severe COVID-19 illness. We evaluated the association between the number of vascular risk factors and the development of severe COVID-19 disease, using a Cox regression model. RESULTS: Sixteen (9.8%) patients had no vascular risk factors; 38 (23.2%) had 1; 58 (35.4%) had 2; 34 (20.7%) had 3; and 18 (10.9%) had ≥4 risk factors. Twenty-nine patients (17.7%) experienced severe COVID-19 disease with a median (14 [7-27] days) duration between onset to developing severe COVID-19 disease, an event rate of 4.47 per 1000-patient days (95%CI 3.10-6.43). Kaplan-Meier curves showed a gradual increase in the risk of severe COVID-19 illness (log-rank P < 0.001) stratified by the number of vascular risk factors. After adjustment for age, sex, and comorbidities as potential confounders, vascular risk factor burden remained associated with an increasing risk of severe COVID-19 illness. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with increasing vascular risk factor burden have an increasing risk of severe COVID-19 disease, and this population might benefit from specific COVID-19 prevention (e.g., self-isolation) and early hospital treatment measures.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Vascular Diseases/epidemiology , Aged , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , COVID-19 , China/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Female , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Vascular Diseases/diagnosisABSTRACT
The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection has rapidly grown worldwide,1 and many governments have implemented policies to control the infection rate. For example, school suspension, self-quarantine, requirement of citizens to stay at home,2 travel and border controls, and discouragement of outdoor activities3 have been used. Although these actions emphasizing the importance of "spatial distancing" are based on the perspective of public health, they may result in health problems other than COVID-19 infection, such as psychological distress and fear.4 Therefore, the present authors examined the potential predictors for psychological distress among schoolchildren during COVID-19 school suspension.