Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Neuropsychopharmacology ; 47:324-325, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2240701
ITE Journal (Institute of Transportation Engineers) ; 92(4):26-29, 2022.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2236267


Equity is becoming a higher priority for transportation agencies and organizations, particularly as the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted gaps in access and as racial injustice has inspired new commitments to antiracist practices. Still, while questions of diversity, access, and bias have come into focus within our industry and have even, at times, led to more equitable public engagement during the planning stages of a project, centering equity should not stop there. Here, Thompson et al encourage transportation practitioners to remember that our work does not have an unspecified end--it impacts actual people whose lived experiences matter and who should be treated equitably. © 2022, Institute of Transportation Engineers. All rights reserved.

Resusc Plus ; 13: 100366, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2236276


Aim: To determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Resuscitation Council UK Advanced Life Support (ALS) and Immediate Life Support (ILS) course numbers and outcomes. Methods: We conducted a before-after study using course data from the Resuscitation Council UK Learning Management System between January 2018 and December 2021, using 23 March 2020 as the cut-off between pre- and post-pandemic periods. Demographics and outcomes were analysed using chi-squared tests and regression models. Results: There were 90,265 ALS participants (51,464 pre-; 38,801 post-) and 368,140 ILS participants (225,628 pre-; 142,512 post-). There was a sharp decline in participants on ALS/ILS courses due to COVID-19. ALS participant numbers rebounded to exceed pre-pandemic levels, whereas ILS numbers recovered to a lesser degree with increased uptake of e-learning versions. Mean ALS course participants reduced from 20.0 to 14.8 post-pandemic (P < 0.001).Post-pandemic there were small but statistically significant decreases in ALS Cardiac Arrest Simulation Test pass rates (from 82.1 % to 80.1 % (OR = 0.90, 95 % CI = 0.86-0.94, P < 0.001)), ALS MCQ score (from 86.6 % to 86.0 % (mean difference = -0.35, 95 % CI -0.44 to -0.26, P < 0.001)), and overall ALS course results (from 95.2 %to 94.7 %, OR = 0.92, CI = 0.85-0.99, P = 0.023). ILS course outcomes were similar post-pandemic (from 99.4 % to 99.4 %, P = 0.037). Conclusion: COVID-19 caused a sharp decline in the number of participants on ALS/ILS courses and an accelerated uptake of e-learning versions, with the average ALS course size reducing significantly. The small reduction in performance on ALS courses requires further research to clarify the contributing factors.