ABSTRACT
The Omicron variant is currently ravaging the world, raising serious concern globally. Monitoring genomic variations and determining their influence on biological features are critical for tracing its ongoing transmission and facilitating effective measures. Based on large-scale sequences from different continents, this study found that: (i) The genetic diversity of Omicron is much lower than that of the Delta variant. Still, eight deletions (Del 1-8) and 1 insertion, as well as 130 SNPs, were detected on the Omicron genomes, with two deletions (Del 3 and 4) and 38 SNPs commonly detected on all continents and exhibiting high-occurring frequencies. (ii) Four groups of tightly linked SNPs (linkage I-IV) were detected, among which linkage I, containing 38 SNPs, with 6 located in the RBD, increased its occurring frequency remarkably over time. (iii) The third codons of the Omicron shouldered the most mutation pressures, while the second codons presented the least flexibility. (iv) Four major mutants with amino acid substitutions in the RBD were detected, and further structural analysis suggested that the substitutions did not alter the viral receptor binding ability greatly. It was inferred that though the Omicron genome harbored great changes in antigenicity and remarkable ability to evade immunity, it was immune-pressure selected. This study tracked mutational signatures of Omicron variant and the potential biological significance of the SNPs, and the linkages await further functional verification.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Mutation , Amino Acid SubstitutionABSTRACT
Background: Omicron has become the dominant variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) globally. We aimed to compare the clinical and pulmonary computed tomography (CT) characteristics of the patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron with those of patients infected with the Alpha viral strain. Methods: Clinical profiles and pulmonary CT images of 420 patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) at Ningbo First Hospital between January 2020 and April 2022 were collected. Demographic characteristics, symptoms, and imaging manifestations of patients infected with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant were compared with those of patients infected with the Alpha strain. Results: A total of 38 patients were diagnosed to be infected with the Alpha strain of SARS-CoV-2, whereas 382 patients were thought to be infected with the Omicron variant. Compared with patients infected with the Alpha strain, those infected with the Omicron variant were younger, and a higher proportion of men were infected (P < 0.001). Notably, 93 (24.3%) of the patients infected with Omicron were asymptomatic, whereas only two (5.3%) of the patients infected with the Alpha strain were asymptomatic. Fever (65.8%), cough (63.2%), shortness of breath (21.1%), and diarrhea (21.1%) were more common in patients infected with the SARS-CoV-2 Alpha strain, while runny nose (24.1%), sore throat (31.9%), body aches (13.6%), and headache (12.3%) were more common in patients with the Omicron variant. Compared with 33 (86.84%) of 38 patients infected with the Alpha strain, who had viral pneumonia on pulmonary CT images, only 5 (1.3%) of 382 patients infected with the Omicron variant had mild foci. In addition, the distribution of opacities in the five patients was unilateral and centrilobular, whereas most patients infected with the Alpha strain had bilateral involvement and multiple lesions in the peripheral zones of the lung. Conclusion: The SARS-CoV-2 Alpha strain mainly affects the lungs, while Omicron is confined to the upper respiratory tract in patients with COVID-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung/pathology , Male , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
This study aimed to examine the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on the psychiatric symptoms of hospitalized schizophrenia patients and to evaluate the association between the severity of psychiatric symptoms and the COVID-19 vaccination decision. We assessed the psychiatric symptoms of 330 hospitalized schizophrenia patients who accepted the vaccine and 114 patients who declined the vaccine option with PANSS before and after vaccination. We showed that the unwillingness to receive the vaccine is correlated with a higher level of psychiatric symptoms. COVID-19 vaccination is associated with slight deterioration of the schizophrenia symptoms of elderly hospitalized patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Schizophrenia , Vaccines , Humans , Aged , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cohort Studies , VaccinationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical effect of acupuncture on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) based on the conventional treatment. METHODS: A total of 35 patients with COVID-19 of mild or ordinary type were involved (3 cases dropped off). Acupuncture was applied on the basis of western medicine and Chinese materia medica treatment. Dazhui (GV 14), Fengchi (GB 20), Kongzui (LU 6), Hegu (LI 4), etc. were selected as the main acupoints, the supplementary acupoints and the reinforcing and reducing manipulations were selected according to syndrome differentiation. Acupuncture treatment was given once a day, 5 times a week. On day 3 and day 7 of acupuncture, relief condition of the main symptoms was observed. Before acupuncture and on day 3 and day 7 of acupuncture, efficacy evaluation scale of TCM on COVID-19 (efficacy evaluation scale) score was recorded. The effects of different intervention time of acupuncture on patients' hospitalization time were compared, the understanding of acupuncture treatment of patients discharged from hospital was recorded, the clinical efficacy and safety of acupuncture treatment were evaluated. RESULTS: On day 3 and day 7 of acupuncture, the symptoms of lung system and non lung system were both relieved; the scores of efficacy evaluation scale were both decreased compared before acupuncture (P<0.05), and the efficacy evaluation scale score of day 7 of acupuncture were lower than day 3 of acupuncture (P<0.05). The average hospitalization time of patients received early acupuncture was shorter than late acupuncture (P<0.05). The total effective rate was 84.4% (27/32) on day 7 of acupuncture, which was higher than 34.4% (11/32) on day 3 of acupuncture (P<0.05). During the acupuncture treatment, there were neither adverse reactions in patients nor occupational exposures in doctors. The patients generally believed that acupuncture could promote the recovery of COVID-19 and recommended acupuncture treatment. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the conventional treatment, acupuncture can effectively relieve the clinical symptoms in patients with COVID-19, early intervention of acupuncture can accelerate the recovery process. Acupuncture has good safety, clinical compliance and recognition of patients.
Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy , COVID-19 , Acupuncture Points , COVID-19/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Humans , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants have been emerging and circulating globally since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, of which B.1.617 lineage that was first reported in India at the end of 2020, soon became predominant. Tracing genomic variations and understanding their impact on the viral properties are the foundations for the vaccine and drug development and for the mitigation measures to be taken or lifted. In this study, 1,051 near-complete genomes and 1,559 spike (S) sequences belonging to the B.1.617 were analyzed. A genome-wide spread of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was identified. Of the high frequency mutations identified, 61% (11/18) involved structural proteins, despite two third of the viral genome encoding nonstructural proteins. There were 22 positive selection sites, mostly distributed across the S protein, of which 16 were led by non-C to U transition and should be of a special attention. Haplotype network revealed that a large number of daughter haplotypes were continually derived throughout the pandemic, of which H177, H181 H219 and H286 from the ancestor haplotype H176 of B.1.617.2 were widely prevalent. Besides the well known substitutions of L452R, P681R and deletions of E156 and F157, as well as the potential biological significance, structural analysis in this study still indicated that new amino acid changes in B.1.617, such as E484Q and N501Y, had reshaped the viral bonding network, and increasingly sequenced N501Y mutant with a potential enhanced binding ability was detected in many other countries in the follow-up monitoring. Although we can't conclude the properties of all the mutants including N501Y thoroughly, it merits focusing on their spread epidemically and biologically.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had an enormous impact worldwide, and vaccination is believed to be the method that will control the pandemic. Several types of vaccines developed using different platforms have been authorized, but the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of heterologous prime-boost vaccination with different vaccines remain largely unclear. AREAS COVERED: Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, medRxiv, Research Square, and SSRN were searched to investigate the immunogenicity and reactogenicity associated with heterologous vaccination.As of 30 June 2021, four trials including 1,862 participants were identified. Heterologous administration of BNT162b2 (BNT) in ChAdOx1 (ChAd)-primed participants (ChAd/BNT) showed noninferior immunogenicity to homologous BNT administration (both prime and booster were BNT vaccines, BNT/BNT) with tolerable reactogenicity and higher T cell responses. Compared with homologous ChAdOX1 vaccination (ChAd/ChAd), heterologous ChAd/BNT was found to elicit higher immunogenicity (ChAd/BNT vs. ChAd/ChAd, antibody titer ratio: 9.2). EXPERT OPINION: Our systematic review found robust immunogenicity and tolerable reactogenicity of heterologous administration of a BNT162b2 boost in ChAdOx1-primed participants. An additional benefit of stronger T cellular immunity was also observed. Heterologous vaccination is a reasonable and feasible strategy to combat COVID-19. Further studies are warranted to confirm the benefits and identify the optimal combinations, doses, and intervals.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19/prevention & control , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , Humans , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , VaccinationSubject(s)
Measles/diagnosis , Child , Diagnosis, Differential , Exanthema/etiology , Female , Fever/etiology , Humans , Measles/complications , TravelABSTRACT
Monitoring the mutation and evolution of the virus is important for tracing its ongoing transmission and facilitating effective vaccine development. A total of 342 complete genomic sequences of SARS-CoV-2 were analyzed in this study. Compared to the reference genome reported in December 2019, 465 mutations were found, among which, 347 occurred in only 1 sequence, while 26 occurred in more than 5 sequences. For these 26 further identified as SNPs, 14 were closely linked and were grouped into 5 profiles. Phylogenetic analysis revealed the sequences formed 2 major groups. Most of the sequences in late period (March and April) constituted the Cluster II, while the sequences before March in this study and the reported S/L and A/B/C types in previous studies were all in Cluster I. The distributions of some mutations were specific geographically or temporally, the potential effect of which on the transmission and pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 deserves further evaluation and monitoring. Two mutations were found in the receptor-binding domain (RBD) but outside the receptor-binding motif (RBM), indicating that mutations may only have marginal biological effects but merit further attention. The observed novel sequence divergence is of great significance to the study of the transmission, pathogenicity, and development of an effective vaccine for SARS-CoV-2.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: No data is available about in-flight transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Here, we report an in-flight transmission cluster of COVID-19 and describe the clinical characteristics of these patients. METHODS: After a flight, laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 was reported in 12 patients. Ten patients were admitted to the designated hospital. Data was collected from 25th January to 28th February 2020. Clinical information was retrospectively collected. RESULTS: All patients were passengers, and none were flight attendants. The median age was 33 years, and 70% were females. None was admitted to intensive care unit, and no patients died up to 28th February. The median incubation period was 3.0 days and time from onset of illness to hospital admission was 2 days. The most common symptom was fever. Two patients were asymptomatic and had normal chest CT scan during hospital stay. On admission, initial RT-PCR was positive in 9 patients, and initial chest CT was positive in half of the patients. The median lung 'total severity score' of chest CT was 6. 'Crazy-paving' pattern, pleural effusion, and ground-glass nodules were seen. CONCLUSION: There is potential for COVID-19 transmission in aeroplanes, but the symptoms were mild in our patients. Passengers and attendants must be protected during flights.
Subject(s)
Aircraft , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Adult , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , China/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Female , Fever/diagnosis , Fever/virology , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Approximately 20-30% of patients with COVID-19 require hospitalization, and 5-12% may require critical care in an intensive care unit (ICU). A rapid surge in cases of severe COVID-19 will lead to a corresponding surge in demand for ICU care. Because of constraints on resources, frontline healthcare workers may be unable to provide the frequent monitoring and assessment required for all patients at high risk of clinical deterioration. We developed a machine learning-based risk prioritization tool that predicts ICU transfer within 24 h, seeking to facilitate efficient use of care providers' efforts and help hospitals plan their flow of operations. METHODS: A retrospective cohort was comprised of non-ICU COVID-19 admissions at a large acute care health system between 26 February and 18 April 2020. Time series data, including vital signs, nursing assessments, laboratory data, and electrocardiograms, were used as input variables for training a random forest (RF) model. The cohort was randomly split (70:30) into training and test sets. The RF model was trained using 10-fold cross-validation on the training set, and its predictive performance on the test set was then evaluated. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 1987 unique patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and admitted to non-ICU units of the hospital. The median time to ICU transfer was 2.45 days from the time of admission. Compared to actual admissions, the tool had 72.8% (95% CI: 63.2-81.1%) sensitivity, 76.3% (95% CI: 74.7-77.9%) specificity, 76.2% (95% CI: 74.6-77.7%) accuracy, and 79.9% (95% CI: 75.2-84.6%) area under the receiver operating characteristics curve. CONCLUSIONS: A ML-based prediction model can be used as a screening tool to identify patients at risk of imminent ICU transfer within 24 h. This tool could improve the management of hospital resources and patient-throughput planning, thus delivering more effective care to patients hospitalized with COVID-19.