Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
2.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 11(11)2021 Nov 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1533839

ABSTRACT

Invasive fungal disease (IFD) leads to increased mortality, morbidity, and costs of treatment in patients with immunosuppressive conditions. The definitive diagnosis of IFD relies on the isolation of the causative fungal agents through microscopy, culture, or nucleic acid testing in tissue samples obtained from the sites of the disease. Biopsy is not always feasible or safe to be undertaken in immunocompromised hosts at risk of IFD. Noninvasive diagnostic techniques are, therefore, needed for the diagnosis and treatment response assessment of IFD. The available techniques that identify fungal-specific antigens in biological samples for diagnosing IFD have variable sensitivity and specificity. They also have limited utility in response assessment. Imaging has, therefore, been applied for the noninvasive detection of IFD. Morphologic imaging with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most applied technique. These techniques are neither sufficiently sensitive nor specific for the early diagnosis of IFD. Morphologic changes evaluated by CT and MRI occur later in the disease course and during recovery after successful treatment. These modalities may, therefore, not be ideal for early diagnosis and early response to therapy determination. Radionuclide imaging allows for targeting the host response to pathogenic fungi or specific structures of the pathogen itself. This makes radionuclide imaging techniques suitable for the early diagnosis and treatment response assessment of IFD. In this review, we aimed to discuss the interplay of host immunity, immunosuppression, and the occurrence of IFD. We also discuss the currently available radionuclide probes that have been evaluated in preclinical and clinical studies for their ability to detect IFD.

3.
Semin Nucl Med ; 51(6): 633-645, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1300228

ABSTRACT

White blood cells activated by either a pathogen or as part of a systemic inflammatory disease are characterized by high energy consumption and are therefore taking up the glucose analogue PET tracer FDG avidly. It is therefore not surprising that a steadily growing body of research and clinical reports now supports the use of FDG PET/CT to diagnose a wide range of patients with non-oncological diseases. However, using FDG PET/CT in patients with infectious or inflammatory diseases has some limitations and potential pitfalls that are not necessarily as pronounced in oncology FDG PET/CT. Some of these limitations are of a general nature and related to the laborious acquisition of PET images in patients that are often acutely ill, whereas others are more disease-specific and related to the particular metabolism in some of the organs most commonly affected by infections or inflammatory disease. Both inflammatory and infectious diseases are characterized by a more diffuse and less pathognomonic pattern of FDG uptake than oncology FDG PET/CT and the affected organs also typically have some physiological FDG uptake. In addition, patients referred to PET/CT with suspected infection or inflammation are rarely treatment naïve and may have received varying doses of antibiotics, corticosteroids or other immune-modulating drugs at the time of their examination. Combined, this results in a higher rate of false positive FDG findings and also in some cases a lower sensitivity to detect active disease. In this review, we therefore discuss the limitations and pitfalls of FDG PET/CT to diagnose infections and inflammation taking these issues into consideration. Our review encompasses the most commonly encountered inflammatory and infectious diseases in head and neck, in the cardiovascular system, in the abdominal organs and in the musculoskeletal system. Finally, new developments in the field of PET/CT that may help overcome some of these limitations are briefly highlighted.


Subject(s)
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Humans , Inflammation/diagnostic imaging , Positron-Emission Tomography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL