Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 13(9): e009622, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-744903


The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has resulted in additional challenges for systems designed to perform expeditious primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. There are 2 important considerations: the guideline-recommended time goals were difficult to achieve for many patients in high-income countries even before the pandemic, and there is a steep increase in mortality when primary percutaneous coronary intervention cannot be delivered in a timely fashion. Although the use of fibrinolytic therapy has progressively decreased over the last several decades in high-income countries, in circumstances when delays in timely delivery of primary percutaneous coronary intervention are expected, a modern fibrinolytic-based pharmacoinvasive strategy may need to be considered. The purpose of this review is to systematically discuss the contemporary role of an evidence-based fibrinolytic reperfusion strategy as part of a pharmacoinvasive approach, in the context of the emerging coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections , Humans , Pandemics , Patient Selection , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Pneumonia, Viral , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Time Factors
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 98(2): 217-222, 2021 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-695689


OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic migitation measures on of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care. BACKGROUND: We previously reported a 38% decline in cardiac catheterization activations during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic mitigation measures. This study extends our early observations using a larger sample of STEMI programs representative of different US regions with the inclusion of more contemporary data. METHODS: Data from 18 hospitals or healthcare systems in the US from January 2019 to April 2020 were collecting including number activations for STEMI, the number of activations leading to angiography and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), and average door to balloon (D2B) times. Two periods, January 2019-February 2020 and March-April 2020, were defined to represent periods before (BC) and after (AC) initiation of pandemic mitigation measures, respectively. A generalized estimating equations approach was used to estimate the change in response variables at AC from BC. RESULTS: Compared to BC, the AC period was characterized by a marked reduction in the number of activations for STEMI (29%, 95% CI:18-38, p < .001), number of activations leading to angiography (34%, 95% CI: 12-50, p = .005) and number of activations leading to PPCI (20%, 95% CI: 11-27, p < .001). A decline in STEMI activations drove the reductions in angiography and PPCI volumes. Relative to BC, the D2B times in the AC period increased on average by 20%, 95%CI (-0.2 to 44, p = .05). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 Pandemic has adversely affected many aspects of STEMI care, including timely access to the cardiac catheterization laboratory for PPCI.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/statistics & numerical data , Registries , SARS-CoV-2 , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology