Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 148(5): 1192-1197, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1385788

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is recommended in patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEIs); however, little is known about immunogenicity and safety in these patients. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the impact of genetic diagnosis, age, and treatment on antibody response to COVID-19 vaccine and related adverse events in a cohort of patients with IEIs. METHODS: Plasma was collected from 22 health care worker controls, 81 patients with IEIs, and 2 patients with thymoma; the plasma was collected before immunization, 1 to 6 days before the second dose of mRNA vaccine, and at a median of 30 days after completion of the immunization schedule with either mRNA vaccine or a single dose of Johnson & Johnson's Janssen vaccine. Anti-spike (anti-S) and anti-nucleocapsid antibody titers were measured by using a luciferase immunoprecipitation systems method. Information on T- and B-cell counts and use of immunosuppressive drugs was extracted from medical records, and information on vaccine-associated adverse events was collected after each dose. RESULTS: Anti-S antibodies were detected in 27 of 46 patients (58.7%) after 1 dose of mRNA vaccine and in 63 of 74 fully immunized patients (85.1%). A lower rate of seroconversion (7 of 11 [63.6%]) was observed in patients with autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy. Previous use of rituximab and baseline counts of less than 1000 CD3+ T cells/mL and less than 100 CD19+ B cells/mL were associated with lower anti-S IgG levels. No significant adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Vaccinating patients with IEIs is safe, but immunogenicity is affected by certain therapies and gene defects. These data may guide the counseling of patients with IEIs regarding prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the need for subsequent boosts.


Subject(s)
Age Factors , B-Lymphocytes/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , Polyendocrinopathies, Autoimmune/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibody Formation , COVID-19/drug therapy , COVID-19/genetics , Cohort Studies , Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins/immunology , Female , Humans , Immunization, Secondary , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Lymphocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Phosphoproteins/immunology , Polyendocrinopathies, Autoimmune/drug therapy , Polyendocrinopathies, Autoimmune/genetics , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Seroconversion , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Young Adult
2.
ESMO Open ; 5(Suppl 3)2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-646077

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus pandemic has provoked discussions among healthcare providers how to manage cancer patients when faced with the threat of severe acute respiratory syndrome related coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) containing regimens are standard of care in the majority of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) patients. It remains unclear whether therapies should be modified in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We performed an online survey among physicians involved in the treatment of mccRCC, and 41 experts responded. Questions focused on criteria relevant for treatment decision outside the pandemic and the modifications of systemic therapy during COVID-19. FINDINGS: For the majority of experts (73%), the combination of International metastatic renal cell carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk category and patient fitness are two important factors for decision-making. The main treatment choice in fit, favourable risk patients outside the pandemic is pembrolizumab/axitinib for 53%, avelumab/axitinib, sunitinib or pazopanib for 13% of experts each. During the pandemic, ICI-containing regimens are chosen less often in favour of a tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) monotherapy, mainly sunitinib or pazopanib (35%).In fit, intermediate/poor-risk patients outside the pandemic, over 80% of experts choose ipilimumab/nivolumab, in contrast to only 41% of physicians during COVID-19, instead more TKI monotherapies are given. In patients responding to established therapies with ICI/ICI or ICI/TKI combinations, most participants modify treatment regimen by extending cycle length, holding one ICI or even both. CONCLUSION: mccRCC treatment modifications in light of the coronavirus pandemic are variable, with a shift from ICI/ICI to ICI/TKI or TKI monotherapy.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary , Clinical Decision-Making , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Medical Oncology/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2 , Urology/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...