Does global health governance walk the talk? Gender representation in World Health Assemblies, 1948-2021.

BACKGROUND: While an estimated 70%-75% of the health workforce are women, this is not reflected in the leadership roles of most health organisations-including global decision-making bodies such as the World Health Assembly (WHA). METHODS: We analysed gender representation in WHA delegations of Member States, Associate Members and Observers (country/territory), using data from 10 944 WHA delegations and 75 815 delegation members over 1948-2021. Delegates' information was extracted from WHO documentation. Likely gender was inferred based on prefixes, pronouns and other gendered language. A gender-to-name algorithm was used as a last resort (4.6%). Time series of 5-year rolling averages of the percentage of women across WHO region, income group and delegate roles are presented. We estimated (%) change ±SE of inferred women delegation members at the WHA per year, and estimated years±SE until gender parity from 2010 to 2019 across regions, income groups, delegate roles and countries. Correlations with these measures were assessed with countries' gender inequality index and two Worldwide Governance indicators. RESULTS: While upwards trends could be observed in the percentage of women delegates over the past 74 years, men remained over-represented in most WHA delegations. Over 1948-2021, 82.9% of delegations were composed of a majority of men, and no WHA had more than 30% of women Chief Delegates (ranging from 0% to 30%). Wide variation in trends over time could be observed across different geographical regions, income groups and countries. Some countries may take over 100 years to reach gender parity in their WHA delegations, if current estimated trends continue. CONCLUSION: Despite commitments to gender equality in leadership, women remain gravely under-represented in global health governance. An intersectional approach to representation in global health governance, which prioritises equity in participation beyond gender, can enable transformative policymaking that fosters transparent, accountable and just health systems.

Normalizing the political economy of improving health

Probleme Les facteurs liés a l'économie politique jouent un rôle crucial dans l'adoption et la mise en Å“uvre de mesures sanitaires. Pourtant, ces facteurs sont souvent négligés lors de l'élaboration de politiques susceptibles d'avoir un impact sur la santé. Approche Analyser l'économie politique représente un moyen de tenir compte des réalités politiques et sociales au niveau communautaire, infranational, national, régional ou international. Nous voulons démontrer l'importance de l'analyse de l'économie politique et promouvoir son usage dans les programmes techniques de travail. Environnement local Nous donnons des exemples issus d'une série de domaines traités par l'Organisation mondiale de la Santé, parmi lesquels la gouvernance participative, le financement de la santé, les taxes sanitaires, la prévention et la lutte contre la malaria, le renforcement des capacités et l'appui direct aux pays. Changements significatifs Les exemples portant sur l'intégration de l'analyse de l'économie politique dans l'appui technique illustrent la variabilité de cette approche analytique, mais aussi sa potentielle contribution aux progres politiques. Appliquer une analyse de l'économie politique a des programmes de travail spécifiques a permis de fournir un soutien technique adapté au contexte, augmentant ainsi les chances d'avancement des pays vers la réalisation des objectifs en matiere de santé. Leçons tirées Incorporer l'économie politique dans le travail technique comporte de nombreux avantages: amélioration de la représentation et de la participation dans le cadre des mesures sanitaires;meilleures possibilités d'adoption et de mise en Å“uvre de politiques solides sur le plan technique;et enfin, renforcement des capacités afin de comprendre et d'inclure les facteurs politiques qui ont une influence sur les priorités relatives a la santé.Alternate :Проблема Факторы политической экономии играют важную роль в определении принятия и осуществления политики в области охраны и укрепления здоровья. Однако эти факторы часто упускаются из виду при разработке политики, которая способна повлиять на охрану здоровья. Подход Политэкономический анализ позволяет учитывать политические и социальные реалии как на уровне сообщества, так и на субнациональном, национальном, региональном или глобальном уровне. Авторы ставят перед собой цель продемонстрировать ценность политэкономического анализа и способствовать его более широкому использованию в технических программах работы. Местные условия Ð’ статье приводятся примеры из различных областей деятельности Всемирной организации здравоохранения, включая управление на основе широкого участия, финансирование здравоохранения, налоги на здравоохранение, профилактику малярии и борьбу с ней, наращивание потенциала и прямую поддержку стран. Осуществленные перемены Существующие примеры того, как политэкономический анализ может быть включен в техническую поддержку, свидетельствуют об изменчивости этого аналитического подхода, а также о его потенциале для поддержки прогресса ² политике. Применение политэкономического анализа в рамках указанных программ работы позволило получить техническую поддержку, более соответствующую контексту, для повышения вероятности достижения странами целей, связанных со здравоохранением. Выводы Внедрение политэкономии в техническую работу имеет ряд преимуществ, в том числе повышение роли и участия в политике здравоохранения, поддержка принятия и реализации технически обоснованной политики, наращивание потенциала для учета и понимания политических факторов, оказывающих влияние на приоритеты в области здравоохранения.Alternate :Situación Los factores de economía política son importantes para determinar la adopción y aplicación de las políticas sanitarias. Sin embargo, se suelen ignorar estos factores cuando se elaboran políticas que pueden influir en la salud. Enfoque El análisis de economía política permite tener en cuenta las realidades políticas y sociales, ya sea a nivel local, subnacional, nacional, regional o mundial. El objetivo de este proyecto es demostrar el valor del análisis de la economía política y promover su uso generalizado en los programas técnicos de trabajo. Marco regional Se ofrecen ejemplos de diversas áreas de trabajo de la Organización Mundial de la Salud, como la gobernanza participativa, la financiación sanitaria, los impuestos sanitarios, la prevención y la contención del paludismo, la creación de capacidades y el apoyo directo a los países. Cambios importantes Los ejemplos existentes de cómo se puede incorporar el análisis de economía política al apoyo técnico demuestran la variabilidad de este enfoque analítico, así como su potencial para apoyar el progreso de las políticas. La aplicación del análisis de la economía política en los programas de trabajo especificados ha permitido que el apoyo técnico sea más pertinente según el contexto para aumentar la probabilidad de avanzar en los objetivossanitarios de los países. Lecciones aprendidas Integrar la economía política en el trabajo técnico tiene muchos beneficios, entre los que se incluyen: potenciar las opiniones y la participación en las políticas sanitarias;apoyar la adopción y la viabilidad de la aplicación de políticas técnicamente sólidas;y crear capacidad para incorporar y comprender los factores políticos que influyen en las prioridades sanitarias.Alternate :Problem Political economy factors are important in determining the adoption and implementation of health policies. Yet these factors are often overlooked in the development of policies that have the potential to influence health. Approach Political economy analysis provides a way to take into consideration political and social realities, whether at the community, subnational, national, regional or global levels. We aim to demonstrate the value of political economy analysis and to promote its wider use in technical programmes of work. Local setting We provide examples from across a range of World Health Organization areas of work, including participatory governance, health financing, health taxes, malaria prevention and control, capacity-building and direct country support. Relevant changes Existing examples of how political economy analysis can be incorporated into technical support demonstrate the variability of this analytical approach, as well as its potential to support policy progress. Applying political economy analysis within the specified programmes of work has enabled more contextually relevant technical support to enhance the likelihood of advancing countrie ' health-related objectives. Lessons learnt Embedding political economy into technical work has many benefits, including: enhancing voice and participation in health policies;supporting the adoption and implementation feasibility of technically sound policies;and building capacity to incorporate and understand political factors that influence health-related priorities.

Health system resilience during the pandemic: it’s mostly about governance

Governance is the most important enabler of health system functioning. It provides a foundation and lever for resource generation, financing, and service delivery and ensures they operate well and in coordination with the rest of the system. It also extends beyond the health system through interactions between levels and actors. While there is no unanimously accepted framework for assessing governance, country examples can be used to illustrate how governance has contributed to health systems resilience during the crisis. Good governance prior to the pandemic, underpinned by strong state capacity, political leadership and community engagement, is keyto responding resiliently during a novel infectious disease outbreak, such as COVID-19.

‘Build forward better’ must include heavy investment in government capacities to engage with communities and civil society

Civil society and community groups are active players in the COVID-19 response, providing support, advice and information where government reach is poor. Yet most governments have not managed to bring civil society’s perspectives, insights, and experiences into the COVID-19 response in a systematic way. If the world is to ‘build forward better’, more regular and systematised government-civil society engagement will need to underpin a shifttowards more inclusive health governance. Doing so successfully will require heavy investments in capacity-building for government actors to value and feel comfortable managing and sustaining participatory spaces and in skills to bring forward the kind of governance needed to build resilience against the next pandemic.

Health system resilience during the pandemic: it’s mostly about governance

Governance is the most important enabler of health system functioning. It provides a foundation and lever for resource generation, financing, and service delivery and ensures they operate well and in coordination with the rest of the system. It also extends beyond the health system through interactions between levels and actors. While there is no unanimously accepted framework for assessing governance, country examples can be used to illustrate how governance has contributed to health systems resilience during the crisis. Good governance prior to the pandemic, underpinned by strong state capacity, political leadership and community engagement, is keyto responding resiliently during a novel infectious disease outbreak, such as COVID-19.

‘Build forward better’ must include heavy investment in government capacities to engage with communities and civil society

Civil society and community groups are active players in the COVID-19 response, providing support, advice and information where government reach is poor. Yet most governments have not managed to bring civil society’s perspectives, insights, and experiences into the COVID-19 response in a systematic way. If the world is to ‘build forward better’, more regular and systematised government-civil society engagement will need to underpin a shifttowards more inclusive health governance. Doing so successfully will require heavy investments in capacity-building for government actors to value and feel comfortable managing and sustaining participatory spaces and in skills to bring forward the kind of governance needed to build resilience against the next pandemic.