Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
2.
Journal of Clinical Oncology ; 40(16), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2009577

ABSTRACT

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic rapidly altered cancer care delivery globally, providing a compelling opportunity to empirically study how these changes impacted persistent disparities in care. Cervical cancer is one of the most common female cancers worldwide, with approximately 90% of cases and deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In Botswana, a LMIC with a particularly high prevalence of HIV and cervical cancer, delays in cervical cancer diagnosis and treatment have been documented but is unknown how these delays may have been mitigated or exacerbated since the pandemic. Methods: The objective of this analysis is to evaluate patterns of cervical cancer diagnosis and treatment initiation before (January 2015-March 2020) and during the pandemic (April 2020-July 2021) using longitudinal clinical and patient-reported data from a cohort of over 1,000 patients receiving care for gynecologic cancers in Botswana. The primary outcome is timeliness of treatment defined by the number of days between first clinical visit and initiation of first-line treatment and categorized dichotomously (> 30 days classified as delay). Primary exposure is the time period (prepandemic and pandemic) defined by the month of first visit. We calculated unadjusted proportion of delays and covariates stratified by time period and used bivariate analysis to examine factors associated with each time period. We used multivariable logistic regression models to examine the association between delay and time period, adjusting for all covariates (age, stage, HIV status, rurality, screening history, and partner status). Results are presented as unadjusted proportions, adjusted odds ratios (AOR), and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Of the 1,200 patients treated for cervical cancer at the multidisciplinary clinic, 990 (82.5%) were diagnosed pre-pandemic and 210 (17.5%) during the pandemic. Among all patients with gynecologic cancers (n = 1,568), the proportion of patients with cervical cancer significantly decreased from 78.6% pre-pandemic to 68.0% during the pandemic (p < 0.001). In comparison to pre-pandemic, patients with cervical cancer during the pandemic were significantly less likely to have attended a screening clinic prior to their treatment (57.6% vs 15.3%;p < 0.001) and significantly more likely to experience treatment delays (61.6% vs 92.9%;p < 0.001). In the multivariable model, patients diagnosed during the pandemic had a 7-fold higher likelihood of treatment delays than those patients diagnosed pre-pandemic (AOR: 7.95;95% CI: 4.45-14.19). Conclusions: The pandemic significantly increased delays in treatment for nearly all patients with cervical cancer in Botswana. Given persistent global disparities in cervical cancer, there is a great need to implement evidence-based strategies for improving screening and timeliness of care in Botswana and other LMICs.

3.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention ; 30(7 SUPPL), 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1394286

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Oncologic emergencies contribute to a large proportion of morbidity and mortality for oncology patients, who present unique medical challenges due to disease and treatment complexities. Emergencies training of medical staff is important, particularly if there is high turnover. We describe the development and implementation of a program to enhance timely recognition and treatment of oncologic emergencies. Due to the COVID19 pandemic, sessions were conducted virtually. Methods: Healthcare workers who normally care for oncology patients at Princess Marina Hospital (PMH) were invited to participate in a series of weekly virtual case-based lectures. Didactic content was developed between Botswana and Rutgers faculty and fellows to reflect specific management and resources available at PMH. Participation was through live chat case reviews and pre- and post- session questions. Feedback was elicited through Likert-scale surveys. Results: An average of 19 participants (range 13-29) attended the training sessions. Average make-up per session were as follows: 16% physicians, 26% Medical Officers, 4% Internal Medicine Residents, 32% nurses, 21% other. Sample output to test PDF Combine only Healthcare workers from Botswana were invited to participate in content preparation and presentation to their peers;3 of 8 presentations were by Botswana personnel. Average pre-session test score was 70% (range 40-89%);postsession score was 82% (range 55-97%). In post sessions surveys, average confidence in diagnosis and recognition across emergencies was 84% (range 71-100%);average confidence in management was 81% (range 57-100%). Conclusions: We describe the successful piloting of a case-based virtual training program in oncologic emergencies, which to our knowledge is the first of its kind. The program was adapted to the Botswana health care setting. Overall, confidence in diagnosis, recognition and management of oncologic emergencies appeared to increase after sessions. Plans are in place to expand the series to more sites within the country, most of which do not have dedicated oncology trained staff.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL