ABSTRACT
To evaluate outcomes of COVID-19 patients with pneumonia-related hypoxaemic acute respiratory failure (hARF) undergoing continuous positive airway pressure therapy (CPAP) treatment, hence, a multicentre, observational, prospective study was conducted between 7 March 2020 and 21 April 2020 in three high-dependency units (HDU) at two hospitals in Milan, Italy. The primary outcome was CPAP failure defined as the occurrence of either intubation or death due to any cause during hospital high-dependency units (HDU) stay while secondary outcomes included the weaning from CPAP to oxygen therapy (CPAP success), all-cause in-hospital and 30-day mortality. A total of 157 patients with hARF (median (IQR) PaO2/FIO2 ratio 142.9 (96.7-203.2)) underwent helmet CPAP with an initial median (IQR) FIO2 of 0.6 (0.5-0.6) and mean positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 10.8+or-2.3 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. The most prevalent comorbidities were arterial hypertension (44.0%), diabetes (22.9%), ischaemic cardiac disease (17.2%) and chronic arrhythmia (10.8%). Hypoxaemia generally improved when CPAP treatment was initiated: median (IQR) values of PaO2/FIO2 ratio at baseline on oxygen therapy (142.9 (96.7-203.2)) significantly improved when helmet CPAP was used after 6 h (205.6 (140.0-271.1), p<0.0001). However, an increase of at least 30% in PaO2/FIO2 ratio during helmet CPAP application in comparison to oxygen therapy was found only in 52% of the population. Median (IQR) duration of helmet CPAP treatment was 6 days. Only 4 patients discontinued helmet CPAP because of intolerance. CPAP failure was observed in 70 (44.6%) patients: 34 (21.7%) were intubated and 36 (22.9%) died during the HDU stay. 87 (55.4%) patients improved during the HDU stay, weaned to oxygen therapy and transferred to the general ward. No patients were intubated during the first hours after CPAP initiation or under high emergency conditions. Among those who died in HDU, pneumonia-related deaths were detected in 26 patients, while non-pneumonia related in 10 patients, including pulmonary embolisms (n=5), end-stage renal failure (n=2), cerebrovascular accident (n=1), end-stage heart failure (n=1) and septic shock (n=1). Among the 34 patients who were intubated in HDU and transferred to the ICU, nine (26.5%) died. A total of 65 (41.4%) patients had a Do-Not-Intubate (DNI) status on HDU admission: 36 died and 29 survived. At the multivariable analysis, CPAP failure was associated with the severity of pneumonia on admission (HR (95% CI) 2.9 (1.3-6.2), p=0.009) and higher baseline values of interleukin-6 (HR (95% CI) 1.0 (1.0-1.0), p<0.009). The all-cause in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were 28.7% and 28.0%, respectively.
ABSTRACT
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many universities have suspended face-to-face academic activities, replacing the more traditional methods of teaching and learning with technological approaches. The use of online platforms at the University of Sassari in Italy allowed the maintenance of theoretical classes and examinations for gross anatomy during the ‘lockdown’. The aim of this study was to assess the attitudes of medical and non-medical students studying gross anatomy and/or undertaking examinations through online platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic ‘lockdown’. Microsoft TEAMS ® online platform was made available by the University of Sassari to enable interactions between students and teachers. Students were surveyed on a voluntary basis using an anonymous questionnaire on the virtual Google Form platform. 326 students participated in the survey. Ratings for the quality of distance teaching and learning were high, with 80% of students scoring 5 or 4 on the Likert scale. 60% of students rated as ‘very good or ‘good’ the quality of teacher-student interactions during the distance-learning lessons. The different connection modes (i.e., mobile line or landline) had no bearing upon the perceived quality of the distance learning. When asked to make a choice between distance learning and face-to-face tuition, a high percentage of students expressed a preference for face-to-face tuition (76%). Our findings indicate that, while students retain a preference for more traditional, face-to-face, teaching and learning approaches, the use of online classes and examinations in gross anatomy were perceived as being beneficial during the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic.