Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
EClinicalMedicine ; 2020.
Article | WHO COVID | ID: covidwho-689222

ABSTRACT

BackgroundThe outbreak of a new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) poses a great challenge to global public health New and effective intervention strategies are urgently needed to combat the disease

2.
Med Sci Monit ; 26: e925047, 2020 Jul 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-689085

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and compare these parameters in an elderly group with those in a younger group. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective, single-center observational study included 69 hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from a tertiary hospital in Wuhan, China, between January 14, 2020, and February 26, 2020. Epidemiological, demographic, clinical, and laboratory data, as well as treatments, complications, and outcomes were extracted from electronic medical records and compared between elderly patients (aged ≥60 years) and younger patients (aged <60 years). Patients were followed until March 19, 2020. RESULTS Elderly patients had more complications than younger patients, including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS; 9/25, 36% vs. 5/44, 11.4%) and cardiac injury (7/25, 28% vs. 1/44, 2.3%), and they were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (6/25, 24% vs. 2/44, 4.5%). As of March 19, 2020, 60/69 (87%) of the patients had been discharged, 6/69 (8.7%) had died, and 3/69 (4.3%) remained in the hospital. Of those who were discharged or died, the median duration of hospitalization was 13.5 days (interquartile range, 10-18 days). CONCLUSIONS Elderly patients with confirmed COVID-19 were more likely to develop ARDS and cardiac injury than younger patients and were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit. In addition to routine monitoring and respiratory support, cardiac monitoring and supportive care should be a focus in elderly patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Age Factors , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Heart Diseases/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult/epidemiology , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Betacoronavirus , China/epidemiology , Combined Modality Therapy , Coronavirus Infections/blood , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Heart Diseases/etiology , Humans , Inpatients , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Organ Failure/epidemiology , Multiple Organ Failure/etiology , Palliative Care/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/blood , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
EClinicalMedicine ; 2020.
Article | WHO COVID | ID: covidwho-684336

ABSTRACT

Background The outbreak of a new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) poses a great challenge to global public health New and effective intervention strategies are urgently needed to combat the disease Methods We conducted an open-label, non-randomized, clinical trial involving moderate COVID-19 patients according to study protocol Patients were assigned in a 1:2 ratio to receive either aerosol inhalation treatment with IFN-κ and TFF2, every 48 h for three consecutive dosages, in addition to standard treatment (experimental group), or standard treatment alone (control group) The end point was the time to discharge from the hospital This study is registered with chictr org cn, ChiCTR2000030262 Findings A total of thirty-three eligible COVID-19 patients were enrolled from February 1, 2020 to April 6, 2020, eleven were assigned to the IFN-κ plus TFF2 group, and twenty-two to the control group Safety and efficacy were evaluated for both groups No treatment-associated severe adverse effects (SAE) were observed in the group treated with aerosol inhalation of IFN-κ plus TFF2, and no significant differences in the safety evaluations were observed between experimental and control groups CT imaging was performed in all patients with the median improvement time of 5 0 days (IQR 3 0–9 0) in the experimental group versus 8 5 days (IQR 3 0–17 0) in the control group (p<0 05) In addition, the experimental group had a significant shorten median time in cough relief (4 5 days [IQR 2 0–7 0]) than the control group did (10 0 days [IQR 6 0–21 0])(p<0 005), in viral RNA reversion of 6 0 days (IQR 2 0–13 0) in the experimental group vs 9 5 days (IQR 3 0–23 0) in the control group (p < 0 05), and in the median hospitalization stays of 12 0 days (IQR 7 0–20 0) in the experimental group vs 15 0 days (IQR 10 0–25 0) in the control group (p<0 001), respectively Interpretation Aerosol inhalation of IFN-κ plus TFF2 is a safe treatment and is likely to significantly facilitate clinical improvement, including cough relief, CT imaging improvement, and viral RNA reversion, thereby achieves an early release from hospitalization These data support to explore a scale-up trial with IFN-κ plus TFF2 Funding National Major Project for Control and Prevention of Infectious Disease in China, Shanghai Science and Technology Commission, Shanghai Municipal Health Commission

4.
Immunity ; 2020.
Article | WHO COVID | ID: covidwho-666144

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY COVID-19 is a severe infectious disease that is a current global health threat However, little is known about its hallmarks compared to other infectious diseases Here, we report the single-cell transcriptional landscape of longitudinally collected peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in both COVID-19 and influenza A virus (IAV)-infected patients We observed increase of plasma cells in both COVID-19 and IAV patients, and XAF1-, TNF- and FAS-induced T cell apoptosis in COVID-19 patients Further analyses revealed distinct signaling pathways activated in COVID-19 (STAT1 and IRF3) vs IAV (STAT3 and NFκB) patients and substantial differences in the expression of key factors These factors include relatively increase of IL6R and IL6ST expression in COVID-19 patients, but similarly increased IL-6 concentrations compared to IAV patients, supporting the clinical observations of increased pro-inflammatory cytokines in COVID-19 patients Thus, we provide the landscape of PBMCs and unveil distinct immune response pathways in COVID-19 and IAV patients

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL