Could volatile cryptocurrency stimulate systemic risks in the energy sector? Evidence from novel connectedness models

By identifying the connectedness of seven indicators from January 1, 2019, to June 13, 2022, we choose an extended joint connectedness approach to a vector autoregression model with time-varying parameter (TVP-VAR) to analyze interlinkages between Crypto Volatility (CV) and Energy Volatility (EV). Our findings show that the COVID-19 outbreak seems to have an impact on the dynamic connectedness of the whole system, which peaks at about 60% toward the end of 2019. According to net total directional connectedness over a quantile, throughout the 2020–2022 timeframe, natural gas and crude oil are net shock transmitters, while the CV, clean energy, solar energy, and green bonds consistently receive all other indicators. Specifically, pairwise connectedness indicates that the CV appears to be a net transmitter of shocks to all energy indicators before the COVID-19 outbreak but acts as a net receiver of shocks from clean energy, wind energy, and green bonds in late 2020. The CV mostly has spillover effects on green bonds. The primary net transmitter of shocks to the Crypto market is crude oil. Our findings are critical in helping investors and authorities design the most effective policies to lessen the vulnerabilities of these indicators and reduce the spread of risk or uncertainty. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Quantile time-frequency connectedness between cryptocurrency volatility and renewable energy volatility during the COVID-19 pandemic and Ukraine-Russia conflicts

Our article employs a quantile vector autoregression (QVAR) to identify the connectedness of seven variables from April 1, 2019, to June 13, 2022, in order to examine the relationships between crypto volatility and energy volatility. Our findings reveal that the dynamic connectedness is approximately 25% in the short term and approximately 9% in the long term. The 50% quantile equates to the overall average connectedness of the entire period, according to dynamic net total directional connectedness over a quantile, which also indicates that connectedness is very intense for both highly positive changes (above the 80% quantile) and crypto and energy volatility (below the 20% quantile). With the exception of the early 2022 period when the Crypto Volatility Index transmits a net of shocks because of the Ukraine-Russia Conflict, dynamic net total directional connectedness implies that in the short term, the Crypto Volatility Index acts as a net shock receiver across time. While this indicator is a net shock receiver for long-term dynamics, wind energy is a net shock transmitter during the short term. Green bonds are a short-term net shock receiver. This role is valid in the long term. Clean energy and solar energy are the long-term net transmitters of shocks;nevertheless, the series is always and only momentarily a net receiver of shocks because of the short-term dynamics. Natural gas and crude oil play roles in both two quantiles. Dynamic net pairwise directional connectedness over a quantile suggests that uncertain events like the COVID-19 epidemic or Ukraine-Russia Conflict influence cryptocurrency volatility and renewable energy volatility. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd

Quantile time-frequency connectedness between cryptocurrency volatility and renewable energy volatility during the COVID-19 pandemic and Ukraine-Russia conflicts

Our article employs a quantile vector autoregression (QVAR) to identify the connectedness of seven variables from April 1, 2019, to June 13, 2022, in order to examine the relationships between crypto volatility and energy volatility. Our findings reveal that the dynamic connectedness is approximately 25% in the short term and approximately 9% in the long term. The 50% quantile equates to the overall average connectedness of the entire period, according to dynamic net total directional connectedness over a quantile, which also indicates that connectedness is very intense for both highly positive changes (above the 80% quantile) and crypto and energy volatility (below the 20% quantile). With the exception of the early 2022 period when the Crypto Volatility Index transmits a net of shocks because of the Ukraine-Russia Conflict, dynamic net total directional connectedness implies that in the short term, the Crypto Volatility Index acts as a net shock receiver across time. While this indicator is a net shock receiver for long-term dynamics, wind energy is a net shock transmitter during the short term. Green bonds are a short-term net shock receiver. This role is valid in the long term. Clean energy and solar energy are the long-term net transmitters of shocks;nevertheless, the series is always and only momentarily a net receiver of shocks because of the short-term dynamics. Natural gas and crude oil play roles in both two quantiles. Dynamic net pairwise directional connectedness over a quantile suggests that uncertain events like the COVID-19 epidemic or Ukraine-Russia Conflict influence cryptocurrency volatility and renewable energy volatility.