ABSTRACT
The increasing societal awareness of employee mental health issues, especially within the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, has led to a great deal of research examining the occupational predictors and outcomes of mental ill health. The consequences of employee mental illness can be significant to organizations, whereas providing employee mental health resources may offer a competitive advantage. This article provides a review of the definitions of employee mental health, the costs of employee mental illness to organizations and to society as a whole, and the role of the workplace in promoting positive mental health, preventing mental illness, intervening to address employee mental ill health, and accommodating employees experiencing mental health challenges. We present recommendations for future research and implications for practice.
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the quality of life (QoL), daily lifestyle, and mental health of people suffering from a mental disorder. This study aimed to investigate the effects of the prolongation of the COVID-19 emergency on QoL and lifestyles in a sample of 100 outpatients at the Psychiatry Unit in Palermo University Hospital, Italy. QoL was measured through the 12-item Short Form Survey and the COV19-Impact on Quality of Life. Lifestyle changes during the pandemic were measured through the lifestyle change questionnaire. The majority of participants reported a great impact of COVID-19 on the QoL, and almost half reported worsened lifestyles. Worsened lifestyles were predictive of both poor mental and physical health related QoL. These results suggest that people with mental illness need interventions targeting lifestyles, and the mental health service in Italy should adjust to the ongoing pandemic, developing virtual treatments.
ABSTRACT
Few longitudinal studies have so far investigated the impact of sustained COVID-19 among people with pre-existing psychiatric disorders. We conducted a prospective study involving people with serious mental illness (n = 114) and healthy controls (n = 41) to assess changes in the Perceived Stress Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire, and Specific Psychotic Experiences Questionnaire scores 18 months after the COVID-19 pandemic outset. Subjects underwent interviews with a mental health professional in April 2020 and at the end of the local third wave (October 2021). A significant increase in perceived stress was found in healthy controls, especially females. Psychiatric patients showed a significant worsening of anxiety symptoms compared to baseline records (t = -2.3, p = 0.036). Patients who rejected vaccination had significantly higher paranoia scores compared to those willing to get vaccinated (U = 649.5, z = -2.02, p = 0.04). These findings indicate that COVID-19's sustained emergency may cause enduring consequences on mental health, soliciting further investigations.
ABSTRACT
Anxiety and depression are the two most prevalent mental health problems throughout the globe. They may present either suddenly or persistently, with a broad range of symptoms, many of which are often asymptomatic. This need is a direct outcome of the mental illness-related economic and healthcare insurance service burden. The expansion of the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting increase in the incidence of mental health concerns have both contributed to the rising need for mental health care. In response to these demands, a substantial amount of research is examining alternatives to the usual methods used to treat mental health issues. According to research, digital games include cognitive benefits such as attention management, cognitive flexibility, and information processing. This study dissects and analyses the game 'Space Invaders' in terms of its design and implementation. The game has enormous potential as a resource for the mitigation of some mental health issues in lieu of or in addition to established therapeutic therapies. The resource is inexpensive, readily accessible, globally accessible, beneficial, and not connected with shame. © 2022 IEEE.
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to assess the frequency and associated factors of symptoms of common mental disorders in the Brazilian population at the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A sample of 1,482 adults, with a mean age of 34.68 years (SD = 13.66 years), 76.8% female, answered a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21), and the Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale. Atypical high levels of symptoms of common disorders were observed, as well as self-mutilation, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts. The mindful trait was the main factor negatively associated with both anxiety and depression symptoms. Worse financial conditions and non-normative sexual orientation predicted symptoms of anxiety and depression, but no differences were found between the group that followed and the one that did not follow the social distancing measures. From the high clinical indices, the pandemic effect can be inferred, but longitudinal studies could help understand long-term effects.Alternate : Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar la frecuencia y factores asociados a los síntomas de trastornos mentales comunes en la población brasileña al comienzo de la pandemia de coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Una muestra de 1.482 adultos, con edad media de 34,68 años (DE = 13,66), 76,8% mujeres, respondieron un cuestionario sociodemográfico, la Escala Depresión, Ansiedad y Estrés – 21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 [DASS-21]) y la Escala de Atención y Conciencia Plena. Se observaron niveles altos atípicos de trastornos comunes, así como automutilación, ideación suicida e intentos de suicidio. La atención plena fue el principal factor asociado negativamente tanto a los síntomas de ansiedad como a los síntomas de depresión. La peor situación económica y orientación sexual no normativa predijeron síntomas de ansiedad y depresión, pero no se encontraron diferencias entre el grupo que siguió y el que no siguió las reglas del distanciamiento social. A partir de los altos índices clínicos, se puede inferir el efecto pandémico, pero estudios longitudinales podrían ayudar a comprender los efectos a largo plazo.Alternate : Este estudo teve por objetivo avaliar a frequência de sintomas de transtornos mentais comuns e os fatores associados a eles na população brasileira no início da pandemia da coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). Uma amostra de 1.482 adultos, com idade média de 34,68 anos (DP = 13,66), 76,8% do sexo feminino, respondeu a um questionário sociodemográfico, à Escala de Depressão, Ansiedade e Estresse – 21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 [DASS-21]) e à Escala de Atenção e Consciência Plena. Foram observados níveis elevados e atípicos de transtornos comuns, bem como automutilação, ideação suicida e tentativas de suicídio. O traço mindful foi o principal fator associado negativamente tanto a sintomas de ansiedade quantos a sintomas de depressão. Pior condição financeira e orientação sexual não normativa predisseram sintomas de ansiedade e depressão, mas não foram encontradas diferenças entre o grupo que seguiu e o que não seguiu as regras do distanciamento social. O efeito pandêmico pode ser inferido a partir dos níveis clínicos elevados, mas estudos longitudinais podem ajudar a compreender efeitos de longo prazo.
ABSTRACT
The presence of persistent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) might be associated with significant levels of psychological distress that would meet the threshold for clinical relevance. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) version 10 has been widely used in assessing psychological distress among general and clinical populations from different cultural backgrounds. To our knowledge, however, researchers have not yet validated these findings among patients with persistent COVID-19. A cross-sectional validation study was conducted with 100 patients from the EXER-COVID project (69.8% women; mean (±standard deviation) ages: 47.4 ± 9.5 years). Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were performed on the 10-item CES-D to test four model fits: (a) unidimensional model, (b) two-factor correlated model, (c) three-factor correlated model, and (d) second-order factor model. The diagonal-weighted least-squares estimator was used, as it is commonly applied to latent variable models with ordered categorical variables. The reliability indices of the 10-item CES-D in patients with persistent COVID-19 were as follows: depressive affect factor ( α Ord = 0 . 82 ${\alpha }_{\mathrm{Ord}}=0.82$ ; ω u - cat = 0 . 78 ${\omega }_{{\rm{u}}-\mathrm{cat}}=0.78$ ), somatic retardation factor ( α Ord = 0 . 78 ${\alpha }_{\mathrm{Ord}}=0.78$ ; ω u - cat = 0 . 56 ${\omega }_{{\rm{u}}-\mathrm{cat}}=0.56$ ), and positive affect factor ( α Ord = 0 . 56 ${\alpha }_{\mathrm{Ord}}=0.56$ ; ω u - cat = 0 . 55 ${\omega }_{{\rm{u}}-\mathrm{cat}}=0.55$ ). The second-order model fit showed good Omega reliability ( ω ho = 0 . 87 ${\omega }_{\mathrm{ho}}=0.87$ ). Regarding CFAs, the unidimensional-factor model shows poor goodness of fit, especially residuals analysis (root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.081 [95% confidence interval, CI = 0.040-0.119]; standardized root mean square residual [SRMR] = 0.101). The two-factor correlated model, three-factor correlated model, and second-order factor model showed adequate goodness of fit, and the χ2 difference test ( ∆ X 2 $\unicode{x02206}{X}^{2}$ ) did not show significant differences between the goodness of fit for these models ( ∆ X 2 = 4.1128 $\unicode{x02206}{X}^{2}=4.1128$ ; p = 0.127). Several indices showed a good fit with the three-factor correlated model: goodness-of-fit index = 0.974, comparative fit index = 0.990, relative noncentrality index = 0.990, and incremental fit index = 0.990, which were all above 0.95, the traditional cut-off establishing adequate fit. On the other hand, RMSEA = 0.049 (95% CI = 0.000-0.095), where an RMSEA < 0.06-0.08 indicates an adequate fit. Item loadings on the factors were statistically significant ( λ j ≥ 0.449 ${\lambda }_{j}\ge 0.449$ ; p's < 0.001), indicating that the items loaded correctly on the corresponding factors and the relationship between factors ( Ï ≥ 0.382 $\phi \ge 0.382$ ; p's ≤ 0.001. To our knowledge, this is the first study to provide validity and reliability to 10-item CES-D in a persistent COVID-19 Spanish patient sample. The validation and reliability of this short screening tool allow us to increase the chance of obtaining complete data in a particular patient profile with increased fatigue and brain fog that limit patients' capacity to complete questionnaires.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: After >2â¯years of the Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, it is well established how sleep symptoms are rising, especially among healthcare workers (HCW). The aim of this study is to evaluate what features are associated with sleep disturbances in the HCW population. METHODS: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of social and clinical variables associated with sleep problems and insomnia incidence in HCW in a large, national-level cohort. The measurement of sleep problems was assessed by self-report using Jenkins Sleep Scale (JSS). A multivariate analysis was used in the cross-sectional design and generalized linear models were used in the longitudinal design. RESULTS: 10,467 HCW were analyzed in the cross-sectional analysis, 3313 participants were analyzed in the three timepoints of the study. Sex, previously diagnosed mental illness and frontline work with COVID-19 were associated with higher scores in JSS in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, only previous diagnosis of mental illness was related with sleep difficulties, especially previously diagnosed insomnia. The longitudinal analysis concluded that previous diagnosis of mental illnesses was associated with higher levels of insomnia development (ORâ¯=â¯11.62). The self-reported disorders found to be major risk factors were addiction (ORâ¯=â¯7.69), generalized anxiety disorder (ORâ¯=â¯3.67), social anxiety (ORâ¯=â¯2.21) and bipolar disorder (ORâ¯=â¯2.21). LIMITATIONS: Attrition bias. CONCLUSIONS: Previous diagnosis of mental illness was strongly related to insomnia development in HCW during the COVID-19 pandemic. Strategies that focus on this population are advised.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) is a model of integrated care for patients with long-term serious mental illness. FACT teams deliver services using assertive outreach to treat patients who can be hard to reach by the health care service, and focus on both the patient's health and their social situation. However, in Norway, FACT team members have challenges with their information and communication (ICT) solutions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore Norwegian FACT teams' experiences and expectations of their ICT solutions, including electronic health records, electronic whiteboards, and calendars. METHODS: We gathered data in two phases. In the first phase, we conducted semistructured interviews with team leaders and team coordinators, and made observations in FACT teams targeting adults. In the second phase, we conducted semistructured group interviews in FACT teams targeting youth. We performed a thematic analysis of the data in a theoretical manner to address the specific objectives of the study. RESULTS: A total of 8 teams were included, with 5 targeting adults and 3 targeting youth. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we were not able to perform observations in 2 of the teams targeting adults. Team leaders and coordinators in all 5 teams targeting adults were interviewed, with a total of 7 team members participating in the teams targeting youth. We found various challenges with communication, documentation, and organization for FACT teams. The COVID-19 pandemic was challenging for the teams and changed the way they used ICT solutions. There were issues with some technical solutions used in the teams, including electronic health records, electronic whiteboards, and calendars. Lack of integration and access to data were some of the main issues identified. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the FACT model being successfully implemented in Norway, there are several issues regarding the ICT solutions they use, mainly related to access to data and integration. Further research is required to detail how improved ICT solutions should be designed. While FACT teams targeting adults and youth differ in some ways, their needs for ICT solutions are largely similar.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: People with serious mental illness are particularly vulnerable to COVID-19 but face barriers to vaccinations. The authors describe the implementation of a mobile vaccine clinic at an outpatient mental health clinic for patients and health care workers to increase vaccination rates. METHODS: In late 2021, mobile vaccine clinics were held in collaboration with a local pharmacy to provide COVID-19 and influenza vaccines to patients and health care workers. Participants in one clinic were asked to fill out a questionnaire about their experience. RESULTS: Of 69 individuals who completed the questionnaire, 96% received the COVID-19 booster and 17% received the seasonal flu vaccine. Most patients and health care workers reported that the mobile vaccine clinic was easily accessible and preferable and that they would recommend it. Moreover, the mobile vaccine clinic was cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Mobile vaccine clinics can improve vaccine access for patients and health care workers in community mental health settings and can be cost-effective.
ABSTRACT
Background: South Africa had over 4 million cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections and more than 1 million COVID-19-related deaths. Despite the devastating psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is little qualitative, critical evaluation of government mental health services in this resource-limited setting. Aim: The authors describe the clinical service plan and response to the COVID-19 pandemic at a government psychiatric hospital. Setting: KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Methods: A descriptive narrative overview of the specialised psychiatric hospital's clinical response (April 2020 - March 2021) to the COVID-19 pandemic was undertaken in the following domains: screening policy; testing and swabbing policy; staff training and monitoring; and restructuring the wards to accommodate mental health care users (MHCUs) with suspected cases of COVID-19. Results: The in-depth narrative reviews led to the introduction of staff training, routine COVID-19 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing of all MHCUs, the creation of designated quarantine and isolation facilities and screening of physical health status of patients with COVID-19 prior to transfer being implemented to prevent an outbreak or increased morbidity or mortality. Conclusion: Implementing a service plan early which included staff training, screening and routine COVID-19 testing services for psychiatric admissions in a rapidly evolving environment with few additional resources was challenging. The absence of guidelines early in the pandemic that addressed the unique needs of a clinical psychiatric inpatient population is a noteworthy learning point. Contribution: The article highlights that the inpatient infrastructural requirements and clinical management protocols of acutely psychiatrically ill inpatients, in the context of infectious outbreaks, require dedicated task teams and bespoke policies.