Pandemic reveals new concerns about facial protection products: Design may be the answer to altering behaviors, habits ushered into standard practice

The article examines what medical suppliers and providers learned about facial protection products after the Covid-19 pandemic of 2020-2022. Topics discussed include remarks from Jason Burnham, Senior Director of Facial Protection at Owens & Minor, evidence of pandemic-relaxed behaviors morphing into workflow acceptance, and statement from Gary Harris, Vice President of Sales and Marketing at Prestige Ameritech, about emergency use guidelines for personal protective equipment (PPE).

Impact of long duration wearing of N95 masks on cardiorespiratory system and subjective sensations of health-care workers during COVID-19 era.

Background and Aims: N95 mask being an essential element of personal protective equipment to be worn by health-care workers (HCWs) may lead to adverse effects and physiological stress as HCWs have to wear it for prolonged hours. Therefore, we planned to conduct a study in our intensive care unit staff to look for the effects of N95 masks on their health as well as to plan recommendations to ease them. Material and Methods: We conducted this study on our intensive care unit nursing staff and HCWs. We noted their oxygen saturation and heart rate at baseline as well as after 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, and 6 h of duty along with their subjective sensations. Institutional ethical clearance for the same was taken. Collected data were entered in MS Excel database and analyzed using SPSS version 20.0. Fisher's Z test was applied for comparing proportion and analysis of variance for comparing two means. Results: One hundred and nine HCWs participated in this, out of which 93 (85.3%) were females and 16 (14.7%) were males. Eighty-four (77.1%) participants were below 40 years. Twenty-three participants (21.1%) were overweight and 37 (33.9%) were obese. There was no significant drop in saturation and rise in heart rate during these hours. Conclusions: On comparing subjective sensations of HCWs, our study found that feeling of uneasiness was found more in less than 40 years age group as compared to more than 40 years. N95 masks were found to have no impact on cardiovascular system and do not lead to hypoxia while working routinely even for prolonged hours.

Elastomeric Half Mask Respirators: An Alternative to Disposable Respirators and a Solution to Shortages during Public Health Emergencies.

During public health emergencies such as an influenza pandemic, disposable filtering facepiece respirator (FFR) shortages have a significant impact on the national response, affecting many types of workplaces that rely on respiratory protection. During the COVID-19 pandemic, severe FFR shortages led the CDC to publish strategies for optimizing the supply of N95 FFRs. These strategies included the extended use and limited reuse of FFRs, wearing decontaminated FFRs, wearing respirators that meet an international respirator standard, or wearing FFRs that were past their manufacturer-designated shelf life. An additional strategy to mitigate supply shortages that was highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic was to wear reusable respirators, such as elastomeric half mask respirators (EHMRs), or powered air-purifying respirators, which can be cleaned, disinfected, and reused. A decade of nationwide initiatives to increase the utility of EHMRs in healthcare settings were realized during the COVID-19 pandemic as EHMRs became more well-known and were used in healthcare settings for respiratory protection. This expanded use of EHMRs led to an increase in federal procurement, research, guidance, and private sector research and development of innovative EHMR designs by manufacturers to respond to workers' needs for both respiratory protection and source control. This paper describes the role of reusable EHMRs before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and reviews past and current research, to inform successful EHMR implementation in healthcare and first responder settings.

The need for systematic quality controls in implementing N95 reprocessing and sterilization.

BACKGROUND: Due to increased requirement for personal protective equipment during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, many medical centres utilized sterilization systems approved under Food and Drug Administration Emergency Use Authorization for single-use N95 mask re-use. However, few studies have examined the real-world clinical challenges and the role of ongoing quality control measures in successful implementation. AIMS: To demonstrate successful implementation of quality control measures in mask reprocessing, and the importance of continued quality assurance. METHODS: A prospective quality improvement study was conducted at a tertiary care medical centre. In total, 982 3M 1860 masks and Kimberly-Clark Tecnol PFR95 masks worn by healthcare workers underwent sterilization using a vaporized hydrogen peroxide gas plasma-based reprocessing system. Post-processing qualitative fit testing (QFT) was performed on 265 masks. Mannequin testing at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) laboratory was used to evaluate the impact of repeated sterilization on mask filtration efficacy and fit. A locally designed platform evaluated the filtration efficiency of clinically used and reprocessed masks. FINDINGS: In total, 255 N95 masks underwent QFT. Of these, 240 masks underwent post-processing analysis: 205 were 3M 1860 masks and 35 were PFR95 masks. Twenty-five (12.2%) of the 3M masks and 10 (28.5%) of the PFR95 masks failed post-processing QFT. Characteristics of the failed masks included mask deformation (N=3, all 3M masks), soiled masks (N=3), weakened elastic bands (N=5, three PFR95 masks), and concern about mask shrinkage (N=3, two 3M masks). NIOSH testing demonstrated that while filter efficiency remained >98% after two cycles, mask strap elasticity decreased by 5.6% after reprocessing. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated successful quality control implementation for N95 mask disinfection, and highlights the importance of real-world clinical testing beyond laboratory conditions.

Face Mask Waste Generation and Its Management During Covid-19

The pandemic during COVID-19 has had a negative influence on the world's fabric, including health systems, travel, living and working habits, and economies in numerous countries throughout the world. Furthermore, it has had a significant negative impact on continuing global attempts to curb excessive usage of plastic materials. The extensive usage by healthcare professionals and the overall community, of masks, sanitizers, and synthetic-based personal protective equipment (PPE) kits, has resulted in massive amounts of plastic trash, with no effective measures or policies in place to reduce its severity. Wearing a face mask as a way of protection against COVID-19 has become commonplace. However, because present mask disposal techniques (i.e., burning and reclamation) produce dangerous chemicals, huge production of contaminated face masks causes environmental difficulties. Furthermore, disposable masks are prepared of a variety of materials that are either non-recyclable or difficult to recycle. Therefore, as a result, it is critical to comprehend the scope of the problem and, equally essential, to devise a viable solution to contribute to the creation of a sustainable civic society. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

Health effects of filtering facepiece respirators: Systematic review of pulmonary and cardiovascular effects.

Filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) were introduced to protect the wearer by removing small particles from inspired air. FFRs are now also used to reduce spread of transmissible agents from the wearer and used outside traditional healthcare and other workplaces. The COVID-19 pandemic increased concerns about potential adverse effects on wearers. METHOD: A PUBMED query retrieved papers through June 2022. Abstracts and selected full text papers were systematically reviewed by the authors. This paper focuses upon cardiopulmonary physiologic effects (e.g., ventilation, CO2 elimination, oxygen uptake, and respiratory control) with emphasis upon current and potential research methods as well as summarizing results. RESULTS: 1985 records were identified, of which only 26% were published prior to 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Effects on CO2 elimination appear more likely to be potentially significant than effects on oxygenation or cardiovascular function. While FFRs appear well tolerated by healthy persons, more research is needed for those with pulmonary or cardiac disorders and for children. Many traditional pulmonary exercise study methods require special care when applied to filtering facepiece respirators. Studying additional parameters may explain the paradox of many subjective discomfort reports despite very limited physiologic effects. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Assessing the Fit of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators Fitted with an Ear Loop Strap System: A Pilot Study.

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, hundreds of millions of people worldwide have become new users of respiratory protective devices. Facemasks and KN95 respirators utilizing an ear loop straps system (ELSS) have recently become popular among occupational and non-occupational populations. Part of this popularity is due to the ease of wearability as compared with traditional devices utilizing two headbands, one worn over the head and the other behind the neck-a universal strap system used in NIOSH-certified N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs). Some users convert the two-strap configuration to an adjustable ELSS. The first objective of this pilot study was to quantitatively characterize how such a conversion impacts the respirator fit. Additionally, a novel faceseal (NFS) technology, which has been previously demonstrated to enhance the fit of N95 FFRs, was deployed to modify the ELSS-converted N95 FFRs. The second objective of this study was to quantify the fit improvement that results from adding the NFS to the ELSS. The study was conducted by performing the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)-approved quantitative fit testing (QNFT) on 16 human subjects featuring different facial shapes and dimensions. Three models of cup-shaped N95 FFRs were tested in three versions: the standard version with manufacturer's strap system, the ELSS-converted, and the ELSS-converted version modified by adding the NFS. QNFT demonstrated that the fit of an N95 FFR featuring the traditional/standard headbands strap system is negatively impacted when this system is converted to an ELSS. The fit of an ELSS-converted respirator can be significantly improved by the addition of the NFS. We found that the FFR model and the strap system version are significant factors affecting the QNFT-determined respirator fit factor (FF), as well as the OSHA QNFT pass rate (FF ≥100). The findings suggest that the current NFS, if further improved, has a potential for developing a 'universally fitting' ELSS-equipped N95 FFR that can be used by the general public, the vast majority of whom do not have access to OSHA fit requirements.

The Flow Physics of Face Masks

Although face masks have been used for over a century to provide protection against airborne pathogens and pollutants, close scrutiny of their effectiveness has peaked in the past two years in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The simplicity of face masks belies the complexity of the physical phenomena that determine their effectiveness as a defense against airborne infections. This complexity is rooted in the fact that the effectiveness of face masks depends on the combined effects of respiratory aerodynamics, filtration flow physics, droplet dynamics and their interactions with porous materials, structural dynamics, physiology, and even human behavior. At its core, however, the face mask is a flow-handling device, and in the current review, we take a flow physics-centric view of face masks and the key phenomena that underlie their function. We summarize the state of the art in experimental measurements, as well as the growing body of computational studies that have contributed to our understanding of the factors that determine the effectiveness of face masks. The review also lays out some of the important open questions and technical challenges associated with the effectiveness of face masks.

Feasibility of nasal bridge pressure injury prevention using a protective dressing and the Halyard Fluidshield® N95 mask in a COVID-positive environment.

The purpose of this study was to prevent nasal bridge pressure injury among fit-tested employees, secondary to long-term wear of the N95 mask during working hours. A prospective, single-blinded, experimental cohort design. Participants were enrolled using the convenience sampling methods and randomisation was utilised for group assignment. Eligibility was determined by a COVID Anxiety Scale score and non-COVID clinical assignment. Participants with a history of previous skin injury or related condition were excluded. The experimental group was assigned Mepilex Lite® and the control group used Band- Aid®. Formal skin evaluations were done by Nurse Specialists who are certified in wound and ostomy care by the Wound, Ostomy, Continence, Nursing Certification Board (WOCNCB®). Fit test logs were provided to participants to measure subjective user feedback regarding mask fit and level of comfort. The results of this feasibility trial are promising in supporting the use of a thin polyurethane foam dressing as a safe and effective dressing to apply beneath the N95 mask. Additional research is needed to validate results due to limited data on efficacy and safety of the various barrier dressings as a potential intervention to prevent skin breakdown to the nasal bridge.

Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of an N95 Respirator Decontamination and Reuse Program for Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, substantial disruptions in personal protective equipment (PPE) supply chains forced healthcare systems to become resourceful to ensure PPE availability for healthcare workers. Most worrisome was the global shortage of N95 respirators. In response, a collaboration between the Department of Infection Control and Healthcare Epidemiology and the Department of Biosafety at the University of Texas Medical Branch developed a PPE recycling program guaranteeing an adequate supply of respirators for frontline staff. The team successfully developed and implemented a novel workflow that included validated decontamination procedures, education, and training programs as well as transportation, labeling, and storage logistics. In total, 15,995 respirators of various types and sizes were received for recycling. Of these, 12,752 (80%) were recycled. Following the program's implementation, we surveyed 134 frontline healthcare workers who overwhelmingly graded our institution's culture of safety positively. Overall impressions of the N95 respirator recycling program were mixed, although interpretation of those results was limited by a lower survey response rate. In an era of increasing health security threats, innovative recycling programs like this one may serve as a model for other health systems to respond to future PPE supply chain disruptions.

The Correlation Between Wearing Face Masks and Skin Damage in Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Background The impact of COVID-19 on the world is rapidly spreading among countries. According to WHO, wearing face masks was recommended to prevent its spread. After regular use of face masks, some people have experienced common skin disorders such as facial acne, rash, and eczema. This paper aims to cite the prevalence and potential risk of wearing a face mask on the skin by exploring some of the rationales that have been established in the literature. Methodology A cross-sectional study was carried out in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia in November 2021. A self-administered online questionnaire was distributed among 389 participants from the adult public to find the correlation between face mask wearing and skin damage during the COVID-19 pandemic. Statistical analysis was conducted using the IBM SPSS statics for windows, version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, USA) to evaluate and test the hypothesis. Results The study included 389 participants; 63.8% of them were female and 36.2% were male. The main result of this study was that there was a statistically significant association between the duration and frequency of wearing a face mask and developing skin damage. 58.1% of the participants were using face masks for more than 4 hours. Furthermore, 22% and 59.1% of the male and female participants, respectively, said they noticed adverse skin reactions on their faces after using a face mask. Conclusion Our study revealed that 46% of the participants noticed adverse skin reactions on the face by wearing a face mask. Females had a significantly higher chance of developing skin irritation than males.

Safe and effective re-use policy for high-efficiency filtering facepiece respirators (FFRS): Experience of one hospital during the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020.

The high transmissibility rate of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 facilitated an exponential growth in the number of infections, posing a tremendous threat to healthcare systems across the world. The use of Non-oil 95% efficiency (N95) respirators demonstrated to reduce the risk of virus transmission. The escalated demand in N95 respirators during 2020 generated a massive shortage worldwide which resulted in serious implications, one being an increase in healthcare providers' costs. In response, various optimization strategies were implemented. This study aimed to assess the implementation of a safe and effective re-use policy for high-efficiency filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) in a high-complexity university hospital in 2020. Associated costs were estimated through a descriptive accounting analysis of resources saved. Acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility rates were 80.5%, 78.8%, and 83.6%, respectively. With an implementation cost of approximately 10,000 USD, there was a 56.1% reduction in FFRs consumption, compared with a non-policy scenario, with savings exceeding 500,000 USD in 2020. In a pandemic scenario where it is vital to spare resources, a FFRs rational use policy demonstrated to be a highly cost-efficient alternative in order to save resources without increasing contagion risk among healthcare workers.