Predicting mortality and admission duration for burns patients in Queensland, Australia: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Burn outcomes can be improved by reducing mortality and hospital admission duration. This increases patient quality of life and reduces hospital-associated complications and costs. This study aimed to develop a model with which to predict burns inpatient mortality and admission duration. METHODS: Multiple logistic and linear regression were used to investigate mortality and admission duration by age, total body surface area, sex, delay to presentation, the use of surgery, discharge distance and period. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred and seventy nine patients (747 pre-COVID and 732 during COVID) were admitted between the study dates. Using multiple logistic regression, age and total body surface area predicted mortality LR X2 (5), P < 0.001, pseudo R2  = 0.57. Using multiple linear regression, age, total body surface area and the use of surgery predicted admission duration F (7, 1455) = 161.42, P < 0.001, R2  = 0.44. Sex, delay to presentation, period and discharge distance did not predict mortality or admission duration. CONCLUSIONS: In our institution, mortality was increased by 8.6% for each additional year of age and by 11.3% for each additional percentage total body surface area. Likewise, admission duration was prolonged by 1 day for every 7 years of increased age, by 1 day for each additional percentage total body surface area or by 7 days if surgery was required. These models have been incorporated into a set of prediction tables for mortality and admission duration for use in our institute that can guide patient and family discussions.

Differences in Applicant Perceptions of Virtual Interviews Between Integrated Plastic Surgery and Subspecialty Fellowship Applicants.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to survey and compare integrated plastic surgery and plastic surgery subspecialty fellowship applicants on their experiences with virtual interviews and to determine if there are differences between them. DESIGN: An IRB-approved survey study was conducted using the Qualtrics platform. SETTING: The study was conducted at the Johns Hopkins University and the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center in Baltimore Maryland. PARTICIPANTS: Applicants that applied to 1) the Johns Hopkins/University of Maryland or the University of California San Diego integrated plastic surgery residency programs, 2) craniofacial surgery fellowship, and 3) microsurgery, hand surgery, or burn surgery fellowship at the Johns Hopkins University were selected to participate in the survey. RESULTS: A total of 94 surveys were completed by residency applicants and 55 by fellowship applicants. After the interview season, 80% of fellowship applicants recommended virtual interviews compared to 61.7% of residency applicants (p = 0.03). Fellowship applicants reported significantly less issues with self-advocacy and did not view the virtual interview process as significant of a detriment when meeting program residents/staff, viewing the hospital/surrounding area, and learning about the program (p < 0.05). A higher percentage of fellowship applicants interviewed at multiple programs during a single day compared to residency applicants (56.4% vs 27.7%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A higher proportion of fellowship applicants prefer virtual interviews, which associated with key differences in perceptions, expectations, and priorities. Our data supports that fellowship programs may wish to continue virtual interviews even after COVID-related restrictions are lifted, because fellows are equally able to self-advocate in a virtual format while benefiting from cost and time savings; fellowship programs would also gain the cost and time savings from this model as well.

Universal COVID-19 pre-procedural swabs in children in a developing country: A comparison of findings over two transmission waves

Aim: The Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has strained healthcare systems worldwide. Some institutions have implemented additional precautionary measures such as pre-procedural swabbing (PPS) to reduce transmission in patients and healthcare workers. We evaluate our experience with universal pre-procedural screening for COVID-19 in low-risk pediatric patients. Method(s): We performed a retrospective review of patients aged 18 years and below who underwent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) assay swabs in our center over two waves (1st May 2020 to 31st July 2020 and 1st April 2021 to 30th June 2021). We included patients who underwent rRT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 prior to any procedures requiring general anesthesia and were deemed low risk for COVID-19 according to our institutional screening criteria. All study patients were followed up for 14 days post-procedure. Result(s): Of 2065 swabs done for patients aged 18 years and below during the study period, 645 (31.2%) were pre-procedural swabs. Patients were aged 4.2 years (median, interquartile range: 1.6 years-9.8 years). Two patients (0.3%) tested positive for COVID-19 by PPS, detected during Period 2 - both had risk criteria which were overlooked by healthcare workers. Within 14 days post-procedure, 10 patients had unscheduled readmissions and 15 required repeat rRT-PCR, all of which were negative. Conclusion(s): In patients deemed low risk for COVID-19 infection according to our screening criteria, routine pre-procedural swabbing returns a low positive rate. Our findings can guide screening protocols at institutions that provide surgical services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Copyright © The Author(s) 2022.

Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on the Patterns and Characteristics of Plastic Surgery Practice: A Retrospective Comparative Study of Before and During the Pandemic.

Background Plastic surgery practices have changed drastically during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, as most non-elective surgeries were deferred owing to the high presumed risk of infection transmission. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the patterns and characteristics of plastic surgery in an academic medical city. Methods This retrospective comparative study was conducted at King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We reviewed data from patient medical records during the pandemic period (from March 2, 2020, to December 31, 2020) and the corresponding pre-pandemic period, defined as the same timeframe in the preceding year (from March 2, 2019, to December 31, 2019). Results The total number of admitted patients in the pre-pandemic period was 479 and in the during-pandemic period was 254, indicating a 46.97% reduction in admission frequency. The median length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in 2020 than in 2019 (1.62 ± 1.74 days versus 2.13 ± 4.18, respectively, p = 0.011). The during-pandemic period was characterized by significantly higher frequencies of urgent procedures (9.8% versus 5.4% in 2020 and 2019, respectively, p = 0.025) and lower frequencies of elective procedures (90.2% vs. 94.4% in 2020 and 2019, respectively, p = 0.035) than the pre-pandemic period. Conclusion The number of plastic surgeries performed has decreased since the onset of the pandemic. However, the impact of the pandemic on plastic surgery practices remains unclear. Further studies are needed to determine the effects of this pandemic on patient outcomes.