The coronavirus conundrum - Reinfections by COVID-19, long COVID - Bivalent vaccines - The pregnant woman - Human rights & Ethics

At the end of the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic, it seems that the enigmatic coronavirus is giving us some respite. However, the number of people infected has started to rise in the northern hemisphere, where a strong winter with snowfall is approaching. But this new increase is also observed in the southern hemisphere, as in Peru, when we are in spring. SARS-CoV-2 continues to differentiate into a multitude of variants and subvariants, some of which are more easily able to evade human immunity and that achieved with mRNA vaccines, and also may not respond to monoclonal antibody treatments. Current clinical information is oriented to the expectation that existing vaccines could at least reduce hospitalizations, intensive care admission and deaths. Learning about the clinical effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the occurrence of reinfection, and long-term physical and mental harm continues, with prevention of infection, reinfection, and prolonged COVID being sought.

Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant outbreak in vaccinated liver transplant (LT) recipients in 2022: A large spread of infection, a mild disease

Background: From January 2022 the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant became the dominant circulating variant worldwide, showing increased transmissibility and the ability to evade immunity. Booster vaccinations improved the protective effects of neutralizing antibodies and might have lowered the risk of hospitalization and mortality, as recently observed. Aim: to evaluate the prevalence and outcome of Omicron-related infection in a cohort of liver transplant (LT) recipients. Material and Methods: From January to September 2022, we enrolled in a longitudinal study all LT recipients who became SARS-CoV-2 infected (95% vaccinated;88% receiving a 1st booster dose and 25% a 2nd booster). All patients were included in a protocol of testing anti-spike (a-S) and anti-nucleocapsid (a-N) antibodies titres before/after each dose (Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2, Roche Diagnostic). Diagnostic criteria for SARS-CoV-2 infection were 1) presence of a positive nasopharyngeal swab (NFS) by PCR or antigenic assays or 2) presence of a-N seroconversion (if previously a-N negative). Reinfection was defined by a new NFS positivity or an increased value of a-N titre. Results: Overall, 201 LT-recipients have been infected by SARS-CoV-2 (62% males, median age=61yr, 50% viral-etiology, 35% with HCC, all received a CNI-based regimen, plus MMF=63%). Most of infections were diagnosed by NFS (72%);mild flu-like symptoms were observed in 59% of our LT recipients;72% of them remained untreated, while 28% received antivirals (11%) or monoclonal antibodies (17%). Fifteen LT recipients were hospitalized, 6 of them for interstitial pneumonia and 2 (both with previous lung diseases) died for COVID-19. Conclusions: A mild or asymptomatic infection occurred frequently in our LT recipients with a less severe outcome than the past waves. A possible explanation could be the high prevalence of vaccinated patients in our cohort. Interestingly, the overall prevalence of SARS Cov2 infection might be underestimated without a careful monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 serology against nucleocapsid.

COVID-19 Risk Compensation? Examining Vaccination Uptake among Recovered and Classification of Breakthrough Cases.

The study has two primary aims: the first is to examine the uptake of COVID-19 vaccination patterns among those previously infected, and the second is an evaluation of the period elapsed between the patient's latest dose of the vaccine and the infection itself by demographic group. A retrospective study was conducted from 1 March 2020, to 31 May 2022, in Israel. The study found that among Israelis, vaccination uptake following infection is relatively low. When examining gender, one sees that the immunization rate among recovering females is higher than among men. Similarly, differences in uptake exist between age groups. When examining the interval between vaccine dose and infection according to age groups, the most significant breakthrough infection rate is among the ages of 20−59 (1−6 days­0.3%; 7−13 days­0.48%; two to three weeks­0.3%, p < 0.001). This study reveals potential reservoir groups of virus spread. Among previously infected, low vaccination uptake levels are observed (first dose­30−40%, second dose­16−27%, third dose­9% and fourth dose­2%, p < 0.001), despite findings that indicate surging reinfection rates. Among vaccinated, two critical groups (0−19; 20−59) exhibit highest levels of breakthrough cases varying per vaccine doses, with statistically significant findings (p < 0.001). These population groups may be subject to a false sense of security as a result of perceived acquired long-term immunity prompting low perceived risk of the virus and non-vigilance with protective behavior. The findings point to the possibility that individuals engage in more risky health behavior, per the Peltzman effect.

Reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 and Waning Humoral Immunity: A Case Report.

Recovery from COVID-19 is associated with production of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, but it is uncertain whether these confer immunity. We describe viral RNA shedding duration in hospitalized patients and identify patients with recurrent shedding. We sequenced viruses from two distinct episodes of symptomatic COVID-19 separated by 144 days in a single patient, to conclusively describe reinfection with a different strain harboring the spike variant D614G. This case of reinfection was one of the first cases of reinfection reported in 2020. With antibody, B cell and T cell analytics, we show correlates of adaptive immunity at reinfection, including a differential response in neutralizing antibodies to a D614G pseudovirus. Finally, we discuss implications for vaccine programs and begin to define benchmarks for protection against reinfection from SARS-CoV-2.

Severity and Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection Compared with Primary Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reinfection has brought new challenges to the global prevention and control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic; however, current studies suggest that there is still great uncertainty about the risk of severe COVID-19 and poor outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 reinfection. Random-effects inverse-variance models were used to evaluate the pooled prevalence (PP) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) of severity, outcomes and symptoms of reinfection. Random-effects were used to estimate the pooled odds ratios (OR) and its 95%CI of severity and outcomes between reinfections and primary infections. Nineteen studies involving a total of 34,375 cases of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and 5,264,720 cases of SARS-CoV-2 primary infection were included in this meta-analysis. Among those SARS-CoV-2 reinfection cases, 41.77% (95%CI, 19.23-64.31%) were asymptomatic, and 51.83% (95%CI, 23.90-79.76%) were symptomatic, only 0.58% (95%CI, 0.031-1.14%) manifested as severe illness, and 0.04% (95%CI, 0.009-0.078%) manifested as critical illness. The PPs for SARS-CoV-2 reinfection-related hospitalization, admission to ICU, and death were, respectively, 15.48% (95%CI, 11.98-18.97%), 3.58% (95%CI, 0.39-6.77%), 2.96% (95%CI, 1.25-4.67%). Compared with SARS-CoV-2 primary infection cases, reinfection cases were more likely to present with mild illness (OR = 7.01, 95%CI, 5.83-8.44), and the risk of severe illness was reduced by 86% (OR = 0.14, 95%CI, 0.11-0.16). Primary infection provided some protection against reinfection and reduces the risk of symptomatic infection and severe illness. Reinfection did not contribute to extra risk of hospitalization, ICU, or death. It is suggested to scientifically understand the risk of reinfection of SARS-CoV-2, strengthen public health education, maintain healthy habits, and reduce the risk of reinfection.

SARS-CoV-2 Infection-Blocking Immunity Post Natural Infection: The Role of Vitamin D.

OBJECTIVE AND AIM: The extent of the protection against SARS-CoV-2 conferred by natural infection is unclear. Vitamin D may have a role in the interplay between SARS-CoV-2 infection and the evolving acquired immunity against it. We tested the correlation between baseline 25(OH) D content and both the reinfection rate and the anti-spike protein antibody titer following COVID-19 infection. Methods A retrospective observational survey that included a large convalescent COVID-19 population of subjects insured by the Leumit HMO was recorded between 1 February 2020 and 30 January 2022. Inclusion criteria required at least one available 25(OH)D level prior to enlistment. The association between 25(OH)D levels, the rate of breakthrough infection, and the anti-spike protein antibody titer was evaluated. Results A total of 10,132 COVID-19 convalescent subjects were included, of whom 322 (3.3%) sustained reinfection within a one-year follow-up. In the first 8 months after recovery, the reinfected patients were characterized by a higher incidence of low 25(OH)D levels (<30 ng/mL, 92% vs. 84.8%, p < 0.05), while during the following three months, the incidence of low 25(OH)D levels was non-significantly higher among PCR-negative convalescent subjects compared to those reinfected (86% vs. 81.7, p = 0.15). By multivariate analysis, age > 44 years (OR-0.39, 95% CI: 0.173-0.87, p = 0.02) and anti-spike protein antibody titer > 50 AU/mL (0.49, 95% CI: 0.25-0.96, p = 0.04) were inversely related to reinfection. No consistent correlation with vitamin D levels was observed among the 3351 available anti-spike protein antibody titers of convalescent subjects. However, the median anti-spike protein antibody titers tended to increase over time in the vitamin D-deficient group. Conclusion Higher pre-infection 25(OH)D level correlated with protective COVID-19 immunity during the first 8 months following COVID-19 infection, which could not be explained by anti-spike protein antibody titers. This effect dissipated beyond this period, demonstrating a biphasic 25(OH)D association that warrants future studies.

Results from a systematic programme of evaluating COVID-19 reinfection cases in the early phase of the pandemic, Singapore.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to describe the coronavirus disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) reinfection evaluation algorithm used in the early phase of the pandemic in Singapore and analyze the clinical and laboratory characteristics of the cases evaluated. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case-control analysis including all COVID-19 cases evaluated for possible reinfection under the local COVID-19 reinfection evaluation programme between 1 June 2020-30 June 2021. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was used as confirmatory testing. We compared all reinfection ("RI") cases against those who were evaluated but eventually assessed not to be reinfection ("non-RI"). RESULTS: There were 74 possible reinfection cases evaluated through the programme, of which 32 were subsequently classified as RI. There was strong statistical evidence that RI cases had a longer interval between 1st and 2nd episode (mean 297 days; 95%-confidence interval (CI) 267-327) compared to non-RI cases (mean 186 days; 95%-CI 144-228). The cycle threshold (Ct) value of initial polymerase chain rection (PCR) at 2nd episode was also found to be significantly lower in RI cases (mean 23; 95%-CI 20-26) compared to non-RI cases (mean 34; 95%-CI 32-36). There was no significant difference in the proportion of individuals who had fever, acute respiratory symptoms or asymptomatic in both groups. Delta and beta variants were most commonly identified from WGS and provide indication of re-infection as these were not 'wild-type' and were not circulating during the time period of the index infection. CONCLUSIONS: Using a combination of serologic, microbiologic and genomic criteria to evaluate possible reinfection cases is useful and can provide a framework for evaluation that may be modified for future similar situations.

Herd Immunity to Fight Against COVID-19: A Narrative Review.

The advent of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its consequent illness, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has revealed the severe impact of new, contagious pathogens on the population throughout the globe. Here, we describe the fundamental notions of herd immunity and discuss their consequences from the perspective of COVID-19, along with the obstacles to acquiring herd immunity. SARS-CoV-2 causes COVID-19, a contagious respiratory infection. It is a major global health issue, with more than 179 million positive cases and 3.8 million deaths globally. It has impacted more than 159 countries; hence, the World Health Organization designated it a pandemic. Different vaccines have been developed against coronavirus to slow the spread of this deadly virus. Immunizing people against coronavirus is the key to getting through this infectious virus. The central concept of this review article is the effect of vaccinating a large population to achieve herd immunity and the reasons for the delay in developing herd immunity. Herd immunity can prove highly beneficial for dealing with reinfection. Moreover, it can reduce the severity of the reinfection in many people who are twice infected with COVID-19. Herd immunity can prevent people in the high-risk group such as immunocompromised individuals; those on immunosuppressants; organ transplant recipients; particular age groups such as neonates, infants, toddlers, and elderly; those with impaired immunity; those with anaphylaxis reactions; and people with chronic diseases. However, due to repeated mutations of the virus, it is evolving into new strains with more severity. Its consequences on the immune system and response to a vaccine are still a big challenge to overcome. How new variants of COVID-19 impacted herd immunity needs to be investigated. The duration required for the development of herd immunity and how long it would last is still under research, along with the number of doses needed, booster doses, and the proportion of the population to be vaccinated.

Pfizer-BioNTech Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine Effectiveness Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection Among Long-term Care Facility Staff With and Without Prior Infection in New York City, January-June 2021.

BACKGROUND: Evidence is accumulating of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine effectiveness among persons with prior severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. METHODS: We evaluated the effect against incident SARS-CoV-2 infection of (1) prior infection without vaccination, (2) vaccination (2 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine) without prior infection, and (3) vaccination after prior infection, all compared with unvaccinated persons without prior infection. We included long-term care facility staff in New York City aged <65 years with weekly SARS-CoV-2 testing from 21 January to 5 June 2021. Test results were obtained from state-mandated laboratory reporting. Vaccination status was obtained from the Citywide Immunization Registry. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for confounding with inverse probability of treatment weights. RESULTS: Compared with unvaccinated persons without prior infection, incident SARS-CoV-2 infection risk was lower in all groups: 54.6% (95% confidence interval, 38.0%-66.8%) lower among unvaccinated, previously infected persons; 80.0% (67.6%-87.7%) lower among fully vaccinated persons without prior infection; and 82.4% (70.8%-89.3%) lower among persons fully vaccinated after prior infection. CONCLUSIONS: Two doses of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine reduced SARS-CoV-2 infection risk by ≥80% and, for those with prior infection, increased protection from prior infection alone. These findings support recommendations that all eligible persons, regardless of prior infection, be vaccinated against COVID-19.

Epitope Coverage of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid IgA and IgG Antibodies Correlates with Protection against Re-Infection by New Variants in Subsequent Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect individuals across the globe, with some individuals experiencing more severe disease than others. The relatively high frequency of re-infections and breakthrough infections observed with SARS-CoV-2 highlights the importance of extending our understanding of immunity to COVID-19. Here, we aim to shed light on the importance of antibody titres and epitope utilization in protection from re-infection. Health care workers are highly exposed to SARS-CoV-2 and are therefore also more likely to become re-infected. We utilized quantitative, multi-antigen, multi-epitope SARS-CoV-2 protein microarrays to measure IgG and IgA titres against various domains of the nucleocapsid and spike proteins. Potential re-infections in a large, diverse health care worker cohort (N = 300) during the second wave of the pandemic were identified by assessing the IgG anti-N titres before and after the second wave. We assessed epitope coverage and antibody titres between the 'single infection' and 're-infection' groups. Clear differences were observed in the breadth of the anti-N response before the second wave, with the epitope coverage for both IgG (p = 0.019) and IgA (p = 0.015) being significantly increased in those who did not become re-infected compared to those who did. Additionally, the IgG anti-N (p = 0.004) and anti-S titres (p = 0.018) were significantly higher in those not re-infected. These results highlight the importance of the breadth of elicited antibody epitope coverage following natural infection in protection from re-infection and disease in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Bifurcation analysis and optimal control of COVID-19 with exogenous reinfection and media coverages

In this paper, a SEIR epidemic model related to media coverage and exogenous reinfections is established to explore the transmission dynamics of COVID-19. The basic reproduction number is calculated using the next generation matrix method. First, the existence of equilibrium points is investigated, and different kinds of equilibrium points indicate that the disease may disappear, or exist that result in different quantity of susceptible individuals, pre-symptomatic infected individuals and symptomatic infected individuals. The stability of the equilibria is discussed by a geometric approach, and it is found that controlling reproduction number to be lower than 1 is not sufficient for eradication of COVID-19. Second, transcritical bifurcation is explored, and it is found that improving the ratio of exogenous reinfection may lead to backward bifurcation under poor medical conditions, which indicates that two endemic equilibrium points appear. Third, to investigate the influence of parameters on the basic reproduction, sensitivity analysis is done to choose relatively sensitive parameters, and the parameters for treatment and media coverage are selected. An optimal control model is established to balance the treatment and media awareness. By exploring the existence and the uniqueness of the optimal control solution, the optimal control strategies are given. Finally, we run numerical simulations to verify the theoretical analysis on actual data of China, and the data from the four different states of India is used for forecasting the situation of infected individuals in a short period. It is found by the simulation that the co-function of treatment and media coverage results in the reduced number of infectious individuals. [ FROM AUTHOR]

RNA INTERFERENCE IS THE BASIS OF HUMAN ANTIVIRAL DEFENSE.

Comparative analysis of antiviral protective mechanisms in protozoa and RNA interference of multicellular organisms has revealed their similarity, also providing a clue to understanding the adaptive immunity. In this article, we present the latest evidence on the importance of RNA-guided gene regulation in human antiviral defense. The role of neutralizing antibodies and interferon system in viral invasion is considered. The new concept has been introduced, i.e., antiviral protection of any living organism is based on the intracellular RNA-guided mechanisms. Simple and effective defense against viruses is that spacer segment of the viral DNA is inserted into the cellular chromosomes. Upon re-infection, the RNA transcript of the spacer directs nuclease enzymes against the foreign genome. This is a really adaptive immune defense that any cell potentially possesses. In humans, the interferon system provides an additional tool for early suppression of viral infections which shifts the cells to the alert regimen, thus preventing further spread of infection. The main task of the human central immune system is to maintain integrity and combat foreign organisms. Accordingly, a suitable index of acquired antiviral immunity should be a presence of specific spacer markers in DNA samples from reconvalescent persons, rather than detection of neutralizing antibodies, B and T memory cells. This article is addressed primarily to general medical community, and its practical conclusions are as follows: 1. Presence or absence of specific antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 is not a prognostic sign of the disease. Detection of specific antibodies in blood simply reflects the fact that the person has contacted with the viral agent. Absence of antibodies does not mean a lack of such contact, and the persons with high titers of specific antibodies are not protected from re-infection with SARS-CoV-2. 2. PCR testing: The PCR results may remain "false positive" in those subjects who have had COVID-19, if the genetic material is taken from the site of initial virus contraction (mainly, nasopharynx). In our opinion, negative PCR tests for COVID-19 in blood plasma and urine will be a more correct index for the absence of the disease, even with positive PCR tests from the nasopharyngeal samples. 3. It is necessary to draw attention of general practitioners to potential usage of retinol in prevention and treatment of COVID-19, given the importance of RLR receptors in recognition of viral RNAs and positive experience of vitamin A administration in measles, another dangerous viral disease. Copyright © 2022, SPb RAACI.

SARS-CoV-2 Immunoglobulin g (IgG) kinetics in healthcare workers and their close contacts reduced risk of re-infection

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for global pandemic, and it has caused more than 2.3 million deaths. Persistence and stability of immunoglobulin G (IgG) response after recovery from COVID-19 infection is still uncertain. Method(s): We performed a longitudinal cohort study in healthcare workers (HCW) and their close contacts (Non-HCW) with known resolved SARS-CoV-2 infection and undiagnosed infection at Maulana Azad Medical College and associated Lok Nayak hospital, New Delhi. Baseline IgG antibody titers was determined and the participants were followed over a period of six months. We also examined relationship between SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) response and new symptomatic infection in HCW and Non-HCW over time. Result(s): 176 (70.9%) healthcare workers and 72 (29.0%) non-healthcare workers were recruited from two cohorts. 82 subjects recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection and 166 undiagnosed for the infection having history of close contact with COVID-19 patients were followed up for a median of 227 days (interquartile range, 166 to 202) after a positive IgG antibody test. In the recovered subjects 70.7% (58) were seropositive for first anti-spike IgG assay at baseline, followed by 80.0%, 90.6% and 82.6% at three visits respectively. In undiagnosed subjects 37.3% (62) were seropositive at baseline, followed by 70.9%, 75.8% and 82.2% respectively. Also, 46.8% (29) were asymptomatic with no symptoms of COVID-19 and were seropositive at baseline. However, presence of IgG antibodies was associated with substantial reduced risk of re-infection over the follow up duration. Conclusion(s): Our data showed that the antibodies levels measured increased over the first three months and decreased slightly after that and remained at a plateau and relatively stable for at least a period of six months. Copyright © 2022 International Medical Sciences Academy. All rights reserved.

Protection Against the Omicron Variant Offered by Previous SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Previous infection with SARS-CoV-2 provides strong protection against future infection. There is limited evidence on whether such protection extends to the Omicron variant. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 635,341 patients tested for SARS-CoV-2 via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from 09 March 2020 to 01 March 2022. Patients were analyzed according to the wave in which they were initially infected. The primary outcome was reinfection during the Omicron period (20 December 2021, to 01 March 2022). We used a multivariable model to assess the effects of prior infection and vaccination on hospitalization. RESULTS: Among the patients tested during the Omicron wave, 30.6% tested positive. Protection of prior infection against reinfection with Omicron ranged from 18.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.0-22.7) for patients infected in wave 1 to 69.2% (95% CI, 63.4-74.1) for those infected in the Delta wave. In adjusted models, previous infection reduced hospitalization by 28.5% (95% CI, 19.1-36.7), while full vaccination plus a booster reduced it by 59.2% (95% CI, 54.8-63.1).

SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced immunity and the duration of viral shedding: Results from a Nicaraguan household cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Much of the world's population has been infected with SARS-CoV-2. Thus, immunity from prior infection will play a critical role in future SARS-CoV-2 transmission. We investigated the impact of infection-induced immunity on viral shedding duration and viral load. METHODS: We conducted a household cohort study in Managua, Nicaragua, with an embedded transmission study that closely monitors participants regardless of symptoms. Real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were used to measure infections and seropositivity, respectively. Blood samples were collected twice annually and surrounding household intensive monitoring periods. We used accelerated failure time models to compare shedding times. Participants vaccinated ≥14 days prior to infection were excluded from primary analyses. RESULTS: There were 600 RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections in unvaccinated participants between May 1, 2020, and March 10, 2022, with prior ELISA data. Prior infection was associated with 48% shorter shedding times (event time ratio [ETR] 0.52, 95% CI: 0.39-0.69, mean shedding: 13.7 vs. 26.4 days). A fourfold higher anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike titer was associated with 17% shorter shedding (ETR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.78-0.90). Similarly, maximum viral loads (lowest cycle threshold [CT]) were lower for previously infected individuals (mean CT 29.8 vs. 28.0, p = 4.02 × 10-3 ), for adults and children ≥10 years, but not for children 0-9 years; there was little difference in CT levels for previously infected versus naïve adults aged above 60 years. CONCLUSIONS: Prior infection-induced immunity was associated with shorter viral shedding and lower viral loads, which may be important in the transition from pandemic to endemicity.

Reduced Odds of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection after Vaccination among New York City Adults, July-November 2021.

BACKGROUND: Belief that vaccination is not needed for individuals with prior infection contributes to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Among individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 before vaccines became available, we assessed whether vaccinated individuals had reduced odds of reinfection. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study among adult New York City residents who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2020, did not test positive again >90 days after initial positive test through July 1, 2021, and did not die before July 1, 2021. Case-patients with reinfection during July-November 2021 and control subjects with no reinfection were matched (1:3) on age, sex, timing of initial positive test in 2020, and neighborhood poverty level. Matched odds ratios (mOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 349,827 eligible adults, 2,583 were reinfected during July-November 2021. Of 2,401 with complete matching criteria data, 1,102 (45.9%) were known to be symptomatic for COVID-19-like-illness, and 96 (4.0%) were hospitalized. Unvaccinated individuals, compared with individuals fully vaccinated within the prior 90 days, had elevated odds of reinfection (mOR, 3.21; 95% CI, 2.70, 3.82), of symptomatic reinfection (mOR, 2.97; 95% CI, 2.31, 3.83), and of reinfection with hospitalization (mOR, 2.09; 95% CI, 0.91, 4.79). All three vaccines authorized or approved for use in the U.S. were similarly effective. CONCLUSION: Vaccination reduced odds of reinfections when the Delta variant predominated. Further studies should assess risk of severe outcomes among reinfected persons as new variants emerge, infection- and vaccine-induced immunity wanes, and booster doses are administered.

A case of reinfection with a different variant of SARS-CoV-2: case report.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was previously thought to have a low reinfection rate, but there are concerns that the reinfection rate will increase with the emergence and spread of mutant variants. This report describes the case of a 36-year-old, non-immunosuppressed man who was infected twice by two different variants of COVID-19 within a relatively short period. Case presentation: A 36-year-old Japanese man with no comorbidities was infected with the E484K variant (R.1 lineage) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Symptoms were mild and improved with symptomatic treatment alone. About four months later he presented to another outpatient department with high fever and headache. We diagnosed him as infected with the Alpha variant (B.1.1.7) of SARS-CoV-2 based on SARS-CoV-2 real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction testing (RT-PCR). The patient was hospitalized with high fever. The patient received treatment in the form of anti-inflammatory therapy with corticosteroid and antibacterial chemotherapy. The patient improved without developing severe disease. Conclusion: Concerns have been raised that the reinfection rate of COVID-19 will increase with the emergence of mutant variants. Particularly in mild cases, adequate amounts of neutralizing antibodies may not be produced, and reinfection may thus occur. Continued attention to sufficient infection control is thus essential.

Active pharmacovigilance in patients immunized with the CoronaVac vaccine in the port of Cartagena group.

Introduction: The crisis caused during the COVID-19 pandemic led scientists around the world to think about the creation of different vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. One of them was the inactivated virus vaccine CoronaVac, which was approved by Colombia's Ministry of Health. However, there are few pharmacovigilance studies conducted by occupational medicine to know the adverse events caused by vaccines. Objective(s): To estimate the safety of the CoronaVac vaccine. Methodology: Descriptive, retrospective and quantitative study, in which a population group of 508 workers from the port of Cartagena group was chosen, who were selected under inclusion criteria, during the second period of 2021 and the first of 2022. Result(s): 3.54 % of workers reported adverse events within the study population. Men had the most reports with 72.2% and women 27.8%. The most affected population group in terms of age was those aged 30 to 35 years, with a report of 44.4%. Likewise, the systems where there was a higher percentage of reports were the musculoskeletal, respiratory, and nervous system for first, second and third doses respectively;with symptoms such as headache, malaise, fever, muscle and joint pain, followed by pain in the injection area. Conclusion(s): In this study it was possible to identify the adverse events reported by the study population. However, none of the events presented had a serious or negative influence on the health and integrity of the workers during the study period. In this way, the safety of the vaccine was estimated. It should be noted that the CoronaVac vaccine did not prevent the spread or possible reinfection of the virus. Copyright © 2022, Editorial Ciencias Medicas. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of possible COVID-19 reinfection in children: A multicenter clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Although it was originally unknown whether there would be cases of reinfection of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as seen with other coronaviruses, cases of reinfection were reported from various regions recently. However, there is little information about reinfection in children. METHODS: In this study, we aimed to investigate the incidence and clinical findings of reinfection in pediatric patients who had recovered from COVID-19. We retrospectively evaluated all patients under 18 years of age with COVID-19 infection from a total of eight healthcare facilities in Turkey, between March 2020 and July 2021. Possible reinfection was defined as a record of confirmed COVID-19 infection based on positive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test results at least 3 months apart. RESULTS: A possible reinfection was detected in 11 out of 8840 children, which yielded an incidence of 0.12%. The median duration between two episodes of COVID-19 was 196 (92-483) days. When initial and second episodes were compared, the rates of symptomatic and asymptomatic disease were similar for both, as was the severity of the disease (p = 1.000). Also, there was no significant difference in duration of symptoms (p = 0.498) or in hospitalization rates (p = 1.000). Only one patient died 15 days after PCR positivity, which resulted in a 9.1% mortality rate for cases of reinfection in pediatric patients. CONCLUSION: We observed that children with COVID-19 were less likely to be exposed to reinfection when compared with adults. Although the clinical spectrum of reinfection was mostly similar to the first episode, we reported death of a healthy child during the reinfection.

Effect of the incremental protection of previous infection against Omicron infection among individuals with a hybrid of infection- and vaccine-induced immunity: a population-based cohort study in Canada.

OBJECTIVES: We examined the incremental protection and durability of infection-acquired immunity against Omicron infection in individuals with hybrid immunity in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: We followed up six million Individuals with at least one RT-PCR test before November 21, 2021 until an Omicron infection. Protection via infection-acquired immunity was assessed by comparing Omicron infection risk between previously infected individuals and those without documented infection under different vaccination scenarios and stratified by time since last infection or vaccination. RESULTS: A prior infection was associated with 68% (95%CI 61-73) and 43% (95%CI 27-56) increased protection against Omicron infection in individuals with two and three doses, respectively. Among individuals with two-dose vaccination, the incremental protection of infection-induced immunity decreased from 79% (95%CI 75-81) within 3 months after vaccination or infection to 27% (95%CI 14-37) at 9-11 months. In individuals with three-dose vaccination, it decreased from 57% (95%CI 50-63) within 3 months to 37% (95%CI 19-51) at 3-5 months after vaccination or infection. CONCLUSION: Previous SARS-CovV-2 infections provide added cross-variant immunity to vaccination. Given the limited durability of infection-acquired protection in individuals with hybrid immunity, its influence on shield-effects at population level and reinfection risks at individual level may be limited.