ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This PRISMA scoping review explored worldwide research on the delivery of suicide-specific interventions through an exclusive telehealth modality. Research over telehealth modalities with suicidal individuals highlights the importance of facilitating participants' access to treatments despite location and circumstances (e.g., rural, expenses related to appointments, etc.). AIM: The review sought evidence of outcomes of trials or projects in which both the patient and therapist attended sessions conjointly and openly discussed suicide over a telehealth modality (e.g., phone, zoom). METHOD: To explore this topic the authors searched for research trials and quality improvement projects using Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Ovid PsycINFO, EBSCO Social Services Abstracts, and Web of Science on 3/3/2021. RESULTS: Nine different articles were included that each spanned distinct treatments, with eight being research studies and one being a quality improvement project. LIMITATIONS: Publications featuring ongoing or upcoming research in which complete study results were not available did not meet inclusion criteria for this review. CONCLUSION: Several important research gaps were identified. While this approach has been largely understudied, exclusive telehealth delivery of suicide-specific interventions has great potential for the prevention of suicidality, especially in the era of COVID-19 and beyond.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Suicide Prevention , Telemedicine , Humans , Telemedicine/methods , Suicidal IdeationABSTRACT
Background: To investigate the factors that have significant impact on the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and vaccination induced immune response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Serological response was measured by quantifying anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies, while the cell-mediated response was measured by a whole-blood test quantifying the interferon (IFN)-γ response to different SARS-CoV-2-specific domains. Results: We prospectively enrolled 109 RA patients and 43 healthy controls. The median time (IQR) between the confirmed infection or the last vaccination dose and the day when samples were taken ("sampling interval") was 3.67 (2.03, 5.50) months in the RA group. Anti-Spike (anti-S) specific antibodies were detected in 94% of RA patients. Among the investigated patient related variables, age (p<0.004), sampling interval (p<0.001), the brand of the vaccine (p<0.001) and targeted RA therapy (TNF-inhibitor, IL-6 inhibitor, anti-CD20 therapy) had significant effect on the anti-S levels. After covariate adjustment TNF-inhibitor therapy decreased the anti-S antibody concentrations by 80% (p<0.001). The same figures for IL-6 inhibitor and anti-CD20 therapy were 74% (p=0.049) and 97% (p=0.002), respectively. Compared to subjects who were infected but were not vaccinated, the RNA COVID-19 vaccines increased the anti-S antibody levels to 71.1 (mRNA-1273) and 36.0 (BNT162b2) fold (p<0.001). The corresponding figure for the ChAdOx1s vaccine is 18.1(p=0.037). Anti-CCP (anti-cyclic citrullinated peptides) positive patients had 6.28 times (p= 0.00165) higher anti-S levels, than the anti-CCP negative patients. Positive T-cell response was observed in 87% of the healthy volunteer group and in 52% of the RA patient group. Following vaccination or infection it declined significantly (p= 0.044) but more slowly than that of anti-S titer (6%/month versus 25%). Specific T-cell responses were decreased by 65% in patients treated with anti-CD20 therapy (p=0.055). Conclusion: Our study showed that the SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody levels were substantially reduced in RA patients treated with TNF-α-inhibitors (N=51) and IL-6-inhibitor (N=15). In addition, anti-CD20 therapy (N=4) inhibited both SARS-CoV-2-induced humoral and cellular immune responses. Furthermore, the magnitude of humoral and cellular immune response was dependent on the age and decreased over time. The RNA vaccines and ChAdOx1s vaccine effectively increased the level of anti-S antibodies.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid , COVID-19 , Viral Vaccines , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines , SARS-CoV-2 , Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibodies , Interleukin-6 , BNT162 Vaccine , Antibodies, Viral , Vaccination , Immunity , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To determine whether four new operating room (OR) protocols instituted because of COVID-19 reduced the cataract surgical postoperative endophthalmitis rate (POE). DESIGN: Retrospective, sequential, clinical registry study. METHODS: 85 552 sequential patients undergoing cataract surgery at the Aravind Eye Hospitals between 1 January 2020 and 25 March 2020 (56 551 in group 1) and 3 May 2020 and 31 August 2020 (29 011 in group 2). In group 1, patients were not gowned, surgical gloves were disinfected but not changed between cases, OR floors were not cleaned between every case, and multiple patients underwent preparation and surgery in the same OR. In group 2, each patient was gowned, surgical gloves were changed between each case, OR floors and counters were cleaned between patients, and only one patient at a time underwent preparation and surgery in the OR. RESULTS: Group 1 was older, had slightly more females, and better preoperative vision. More eyes in group 2 underwent phacoemulsification (p=0.18). Three eyes (0.005%) in group 1 and 2 eyes (0.006%) in group 2 developed POE (p=0.77). Only one eye that underwent phacoemulsification developed POE; this was in group 1. There was no difference in posterior capsule rupture rate between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adopting a set of four temporary OR protocols that are often mandatory in the Western world did not reduce the POE rate. Along with previously published studies, these results challenge the necessity of these common practices which may be needlessly costly and wasteful, arguing for the reevaluation of empiric and potentially unnecessary guidelines that govern ophthalmic surgeries.
ABSTRACT
The multisystem inflammatory syndrome associated with COVID-19 coronavirus infection was first described in April-May 2020, mainly among children who had an acute infectious disease. Soon there were reports of the development of MIS in adults (MIS-A). More than 200 cases of MVS in adults have been described and systematized in the world, while in Russia there is no separate registration of MVS, a single description of MVS is given in the literature. Material and methods. We presented Case report of MIS-A in a 21-year-old woman, accompanied by persistent fever, multiple organ failure syndrome, is presented. The stages of diagnosis and treatment of MIS-A. Result and discussion. A positive effect was achieved during therapy with corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin. MIS-A is a rare life-threatening complication of a COVID-19 that requires emergency therapy with the inclusion of corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin in an adequate dose. The given example will be interesting for general practitioners, infectious disease specialists and therapists.Copyright © 2023 The authors.
ABSTRACT
Technology and artificial intelligence, alongside the COVID-19 pandemic vastly increasing technology use in health care, have precipitated an escalation of big data. Although real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) have contributed to determining outcomes outside the scope of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), RWD and RWE are underutilized in demonstrating drug effectiveness. Utilizing RWD may enhance the ability of regulatory agencies to approve drugs, provide drug effectiveness insight to payers, and improve personalized medicine. Additionally, RWD and RWE may assist in overcoming the limitations of RCT data such as treatment adherence and underrepresented patient subgroups and may support and expedite drug repositioning. Even though the limitations of using RWE and RWD include fragmented data context, poor data quality, and information governance, healthcare analytics hubs such as the European Health Data Space are designed to foster synergy among private and public healthcare players and may assist in overcoming these potential limitations. Such healthcare analytics hubs may enhance the utilization of RWE and/or RWD, which could ultimately result in better patient outcomes. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
ABSTRACT
The proceedings contain 35 papers. The topics discussed include: germline variants and prognostic factors for cutaneous melanoma in children and adolescents;association between polygenic risk score and multiple primary melanoma;Porocarcinoma: an epidemiological, clinical, and dermoscopic 20-year study;primary cutaneous melanoma and COVID-19: a hospital-based study;atypical spitz tumors: an epidemiological, clinical and dermoscopic multicenter study with 16 years of follow-up;pediatric melanoma: an epidemiological, clinical and dermoscopic multicenter study;recurrence-free survival prediction in melanoma patients by exploiting artificial intelligence techniques on melanoma whole slide images;ultra-high frequency ultrasound and machine learning approaches for the differential diagnosis of melanocytic lesions;and genetic determinants of response to therapy in a real-world setting of advanced/metastatic melanoma patients: whole-exome sequencing and CFDNA analysis.
ABSTRACT
Patient safety has constituted a huge public health concern for a long period of time. The focus of safety in the healthcare context is around reducing preventable harms, such as medical errors and treatment-related injuries. COVID-19 pandemic, if anything, has act as a wake-up call for health experts to address latent safety problems. Advancements in the field of artificial intelligence have highlighted the use of intelligent systems as a proven means of improving patient safety and enhancing quality of care. This chapter explores trends in quality and safety research, the use of machine learning and natural language processing in the context of improving patient safety and outcomes, the use of patient safety databases as a source of data for machine learning, and the future of artificial intelligence in quality and safety. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Autoimmune enteropathy (AIE) is a very rare immune disorder that mainly attacks the gastrointestinal tract by T-cell. The full pathology mechanism is not clear. Typically, characterized by intractable diarrhea and nutritional malabsorption with extra-intestinal manifestations. The proposed diagnostic criteria include small bowel villous atrophy not responding to diet restriction, circulating gut epithelial cell autoantibodies (GECA), and lack of immunodeficiency. We describe a case of AIE with extensive GI involvement, presenting in a 60-year-old patient diagnosed with Type AB thymoma. Case Description/Methods: Our gentleman with a history of Covid-19 complicated with pulmonary embolism and an incidental finding of malignant thymoma. A CT-guided biopsy was consistent with undifferentiated malignant thymoma supported by immunohistochemistry staining. Subsequently, complicated severe diarrhea erupted with significant weight loss. Conservative management, antibiotics, and diet restriction were ineffective. Diagnostic work-up was unremarkable except for anti-enterocytes antibodies (AEA) and anti-goblet cells antibodies (AGA). Bowel biopsy revealed villous blunting, loss of Paneth cells, and minimal intraepithelial lymphocytosis with no evidence of crypt abscesses. Corticosteroid and Octreotide have helped the patient's diarrhea. Thoracoscopy thymectomy performed with radiation therapy due to local and lymphovascular invasion. Discussion(s): AIE characterized by severe villous blunting with the absence of goblet cells and Paneth cells, intraepithelial lymphocytosis, and increased crypt apoptosis. In comparison, graft vs host disease lack crypt abscesses, celiac disease shows increase in the intraepithelial lymphocytosis with intact goblet and Paneth cells, whereas inflammatory bowel disease has intact goblet and Paneth cells, and CVID characterized by absence of plasma cell in the lamina propria. The presences of the GECA are nonspecific but it may help in confirming the diagnosis or may predict the prognosis and recurrence. Only AGA has been reported in IBD. Neither has been observed in celiac disease. The low incidence of AIE and the limited existing literature available on the optimal guidance in management. Oral nutritional supplementation as well as total parenteral nutrition is helpful. The target is to control diarrhea and optimize the nutritional status before surgery. The main treatment is thymectomy.
ABSTRACT
History: Transient and generalized adverse effects are common following COVID-19 vaccination;among other adverse effects, shoulder injuries related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) have been known to occur. In this case, a previously healthy right-hand dominant 62-year-old male presented with left shoulder pain and weakness 3 months after receiving a COVID-19 intramuscular vaccine in the left deltoid. Approximately 2 weeks after the injection, he started experiencing pain and numbness around the injection site along with ipsilateral shoulder weakness. Despite conservative management with Motrin, Medrol Dosepak, gabapentin and physical therapy (PT), the pain and weakness persisted. Physical Exam: Left Shoulder-No calor or erythema;significant atrophy of the anterior and middle deltoid muscle relative to right side;abduction 4/5;external rotation with shoulder adducted 4/5;range of motion for active forward flexion was 150 degrees and passive was 170 degrees;passive range of motion for external rotation was 70 degrees;internal rotation to the level of L5;sensation to light touch was intact. Right Shoulder-Range of motion, strength, and sensation were intact. Cervical Spine-Full ROM;no cervical paraspinal tenderness noted. Negative Spurling's and Lhermitte's tests. Differential Diagnosis: 161. Axillary Nerve Palsy 2/2 Chemical Neurotoxicity 162. Brachial Neuritis 163. Mechanical Axillary Nerve Palsy 2/2 Vaccination 164. Partial-Tear of Left Supraspinatus Tendon 165. Acromioclavicular Osteoarthritis Test Results: Left Shoulder-XR:Mild pseudo-subluxation;MRI w/o contrast: 8x9mmpartial-thickness articular surface tear of the distal supraspinatus tendon (<50%fiber thickness). Minimal subacromial bursitis. Mild acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis. EMG/NCV: Left and Right Axillary Motor Nerves: prolonged distal onset latency;Left Deltoid: increased insertion activity, moderately increased spontaneous activity, reduced recruitment;Remaining LUE muscles without evidence of electrical instability Final Diagnosis: Axillary Nerve Palsy Secondary To Chemical Neurotoxicity from Intramuscular COVID-19 Vaccine. Discussion(s): We postulate that the neurologic deficits presented in our case may be attributed to chemical neurotoxicity to the axillary nerve following vaccination as the delayed onset of pain and weakness are most consistent with this differential. There are several cases of brachial neuritis following vaccination for the prevention of COVID- 19, however, EMG/NCV results in our patient were not consistent with brachial plexopathy. Additionally, while there have been a handful of reported cases of bursitis following COVID-19 vaccines falling under the SIRVA classification of injuries, this is the first case of reported axillary nerve neurapraxia. Outcome(s): The patient's left shoulder numbness and pain improved with PT and medical management. While mild improvement in strength was noted, weakness and atrophy persisted even on the third follow up visit 6 months after the initial appointment. He was counseled on his injury and was recommended to undergo repeat EMG testing to document recovery after his 6-month follow-up appointment. Follow-Up: The patient did not follow-up for a repeatEMG after his 6-month follow-up appointment. At that time, the patient was clinically stable, tolerating PT, and expecting recovery of his deltoid function.
ABSTRACT
Remdesivir (GS-5734) is a new direct-acting antiviral drug in the nucleotide analogue class with antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 and the ability to inhibit RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Preliminary results from phase III randomized clinical trials of remdesivir are inconsistent. Understanding the fact of the limited world experience with the use of remdesivir in COVID-19 required further study of its efficacy and safety in real clinical practice. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of remdesivir in the treatment of patients with COVID-19. Material and methods. The study included 1422 patients with a novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) who received remdesivir as part of complex therapy in a hospital setting at medical organizations of the Moscow public health system. Additionally, standard therapy was carried out, regulated by the Interim Guidelines "Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Novel Coronavirus Infection (COVID-19)" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, the current version. The efficacy of the drug was assessed based on primary and secondary efficacy points. Primary variable: 1) cumulative incidence of clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 treated with remdesivir as part of complex therapy;2) median time to clinical improvement according to the World Health Organization ordinal categorical scale (under clinical improvement, the patient is assumed to move >2 categories towards improvement in clinical condition). Secondary variables: 1) median time to achieve <2 NEWS scores lasting at least 24 hours or hospital discharge;2) mortality from all causes;3) duration of fever (>38 degreeC), days;4) duration of hospitalization, days;5) time to achieve elimination of the pathogen from the upper respiratory tract (no SARS-CoV-2 RNA), days. The safety of remdesivir was assessed based on the registration of adverse events using the method of spontaneous reports. Results. The analysis of clinical outcomes of treatment showed that 1195 (84.1%) patients recovered, death from all causes occurred in 227 (15.9%) patients. The median improvement in clinical status on the World Health Organization ordinal categorical scale was 6 days. The median time to reach a NEWS score of <2, lasting at least 24 hours, or hospital discharge was 4 days. The median duration of fever was 3 days from the start of remdesivir administration. The median length of hospital stays for patients included in the Register was 9 days. Adverse reactions associated with the use of remdesivir were recorded in 11 (0.7%) patients. Serious adverse reactions were not registered. During hospitalization, all adverse reactions were resolved. Conclusion. A retrospective analysis of data from the Registry of 1422 patients with COVID-19 who received remdesivir as part of complex therapy in medical organizations of the state healthcare system of Moscow in routine clinical practice showed clinical efficacy and a favorable safety profile of remdesivir (Remdeform, lyophilizate for solution for intravenous administration 100 mg, manufactured by JSC Pharmasyntez, Russia). The data obtained are consistent with previous randomized clinical trials of remdesivir and allow us to recommend its further use in patients with COVID-19 as part of complex therapy.Copyright © The Author(s), 2022.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To analyze the distribution and drug resistance of pathogenic bacteria in blood culture specimens of patients with bloodstream infections before and after COVID-19 (2018-2019 and 2020-2021), and to provide scientific basis and reference for rational treatment and effective control of bloodstream infections in the post-epidemic period. Methods: Blood culture specimens were collected from patients in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University in the two years before and after the COVID-19 outbreak (2018-2021). The Automated Blood Culture Systems were used to perform blood culture on blood specimens sent for clinical inspection, and the Vitek MS automatic bacterial identification mass spectrometer was used for strain identification and the Vitek 2 automatic bacterial drug susceptibility analyzer was used for drug susceptibility testing and drug resistance analysis. Results: Blood culture specimens were performed on 28 736 patients with suspected bloodstream infection submitted for inspection from January 2018 to December 2019, and a total of 2 181 strains of pathogenic bacteria were detected after removing duplicate strains, with a positive rate of 7.69%, including 1 046 strains of Gram-negative bacteria, accounting for 47.96%. From January 2020 to December 2021, blood culture specimens from 26 083 patients with suspected bloodstream infection were submitted for inspection, and a total of 2 111 strains of pathogenic bacteria were detected after excluding duplicate strains, with a positive rate of 8.09%, including 1 000 strains of Gram-negative bacteria accounted for 47.37%. The drug resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae was relatively serious, and the sensitivity rate to ertapenem, polymyxin B and tigecycline was more than 90%. The main non-fermentative bacteria Acinetobacter baumannii was more than 50% sensitive to piperacillin/tazobactam, amikacin and polymyxin B. The sensitivity rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, piperacillin and meropenem were more than 50%. Conclusions: In the two years before and after COVID-19, there are many types of pathogenic bacteria in bloodstream infection, but the distribution do not differ significantly. The pathogens of bloodstream infection are mainly distributed in ICU, hepatobiliary research institute, and nephrology department. Among them, Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii are the main ones, and different pathogens showed great differences in drug resistance.
ABSTRACT
Globally, hepatitis C (26%), alcohol (24%), and hepatitis B (23%) contribute almost equally to the global burden of cirrhosis. The contribution from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (8%) is small but increasing. Patients with acutely decompensated cirrhosis have a dismal prognosis and frequently progress to acuteon-chronic liver failure, which is characterised by hepatic and extrahepatic organ failure, Cardiovascular alterations including portal hypertension trigger the formation of portocaval shunts and varices. Systemic under filling and arterial hypotension is compensated by vasoconstriction but might decline into a state of aggravated portal hypertension and cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, leading to a hyperdynamic state, microvascular dysfunction and reduced organ perfusion culminating in decompensation. The immune system is dysfunctional showing a contrary co-existence of immune paralysis and immune overstimulation leading to secondary infections and inflammatory response syndrome aggravating cardiovascular alterations but also initiating tissue injury and metabolic alteration. This transition from compensated to decompensated cirrhosis is characterised by the occurrence of ascites, variceal bleeding and/or hepatic encephalopathy or organ failures (in the case of ACLF. Precipitating events for ACLF vary between Western countries (bacterial infection, alcohol intake) and Eastern countries (flare of HBV, superimposed HAV or HEV). In the majority of patients, systemic inflammation is a major driver of progression from compensated to decompensated cirrhosis. Once the first episode of AD develops, systemic inflammation follows a chronic course, with transient periods of aggravation due to proinflammatory precipitants or bursts of bacterial translocation resulting in repeated episodes of AD. The multistate model describing the clinical outcomes of decompensated cirrhosis has been well validated. State 3 is defined by the occurrence of variceal bleeding alone, state 4 by any single non-bleeding event, state 5 by any 2 or more events and the late decompensate state by any event with organ failures either with or without ACLF. 5-year mortality across states from 3 to 5 is in the order of, respectively: 20%, 30%, 88%. With late decompensation mortality ranges between 60 and 80% at 1 year. Cirrhosis is increasingly common and morbid. Optimal utilisation of therapeutic strategies to prevent and control the complications of cirrhosis are central to improving clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Aetiology-focused therapies that can prevent cirrhosis and its complications. These include anti-viral therapies, psychopharmacological therapy for alcohol-use disorder, management of hepatic encephalopathy (HE), ascites, hepatorenal syndrome, non-pain symptoms of cirrhosis including pruritis, muscle cramps, sexual dysfunction and fatigue, and reduce the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. New disease-modifying agents are expected to be identified in the next few years by systematic drug repurposing and the development of novel molecules currently undergoing pre-clinical or early clinical testing. COVID-19 continues to pose a significant healthcare challenge throughout the world. Comorbidities including diabetes and hypertension are associated with a significantly higher mortality risk. Cirrhosis is associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in COVID-19 infection compared to non-cirrhotic patients. Patients with cirrhosis should be considered for targeted public health interventions to prevent COVID-19 infection, such as shielding and prioritisation of vaccination.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Liver injury is frequently seen in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and it has been reported to be associated with the severity of COVID-19. The direct action of the virus, cytokine storm, coagulation abnormalities, drug-induced, etc. are considered to be the causes of liver injury, and antiviral agents against COVID-19 and steroids used as anti-inflammatory agents have also been reported to contribute to the appearance of liver injury. In Japan, remdesivir, dexamethasone (Dex), baricitinib, etc. are used as therapeutic agents for COVID-19, but there is still not enough evidence about the frequency of liver injury as an adverse event. Aims & Methods: This study aimed to clarify the influence of Dex monotherapy for liver injury in COVID-19 with respiratory failure. We examined 171 patients with COVID-19 with liver injury in the respiratory failure groups and the nonrespiratory failure groups and investigated 41 patients with moderate COVID-19 with respiratory failure who received Dex monotherapy in the liver injury group and the nonliver injury group at the time before treatment. Result(s): The respiratory failure group had 64% more liver damage than the non-respiratory failure group, was older, had more men, and had significantly more complications of lifestyle-related diseases such as hypertension and diabetes. Obesity was more common in the liver injury group prior to Dex monotherapy, and the liver CT value was significantly lower than in the non-liver injury group. Liver injury worsened in 41% of patients after Dex monotherapy, but there was no significant difference in the frequency before Dex monotherapy between the liver injury group and the non-liver injury group, and the degree of liver injury was mild in all cases, improving in 38% of the liver injury group. Conclusion(s): Dex monotherapy was a safe treatment for moderate COVID-19 with respiratory failure, which frequently resulted in liver injury.
ABSTRACT
The epidemic caused by the infection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 omicron variant broke out in Shanghai in Mar. 2022. Omicron variant has characteristics such as strong concealment and rapid transmission, resulting in significant differences between the current round of epidemic and that in Wuhan. The number of infected patients (mainly asymptomatic infected patients) increased rapidly in a short term. Based on dynamic zero policy, shelter hospitals were set up in time in Shanghai to treat the patients. It is suggested that medical resources and patient characteristics should be taken into account in the independent cabin of a shelter hospital with more than 10 000 beds, and the clinical medical practice should be divided to 5 modes (universal education and management, community outpatient clinic, ward duty, emergency rescue, and temporary observation and transport) to optimize the allocation of medical resources, so as to further enhance the treatment capacity and efficiency of shelter hospitals.Copyright © 2022, Second Military Medical University Press. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has contributed to a sharp increase in health disparities among racial and ethnic US minority communities. This study aims to understand the social determinants of health issues of racial/ethnic US minority populations before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, this study establishes the extent to which Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and Gibbs Sampling Dirichlet Multinomial Mixture (GSDMM)-based topic modeling determines social determinants of health (SDOH) categories, and how adequately custom named-entity recognition (NER) detects key SDOH factors from a Reddit corpus. Moreover, we performed an inductive thematic discourse analysis on the Reddit corpus and High Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (HDBSCAN)-based clustering on the thematic discourse results. We collected race/ethnicity-related data from five subreddits representing five highly populated cities in the US from March to December 2019 (prior to the pandemic) and from March to December 2020 (during the pandemic). Our study identified 35 SDOH-related topics, 22 themes, and revealed that the COVID-19 pandemic significantly exacerbated SDOH issues of racial/ethnic US minority communities. On average, conversations about the Social and Community Context (SCC) category of SDOH had the highest percent increase (358%) from the pre-pandemic period to the pandemic period across all locations and population groups. Some of the SCC issues were racism, protests, arrests, immigration, police brutality, hate crime, white supremacy, and discrimination. The dissertation offers automatic ways to glean SDOH-related information from social media. Furthermore, the knowledge gained from this study will empower researchers, governments, and policymakers to design interventions to shift racial and ethnic disparities toward more equitable outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)
ABSTRACT
Antiviral drugs (ATVs) are widely used to treat illnesses caused by viruses. Particularly, ATVs were consumed in such large quantities during the pandemic that high concentrations were detected in wastewater and aquatic environment. Since ATVs are not fully absorbed by the human or animal body, this results in large amounts of them being discharged into the sewage through urine or feces. Most ATVs can be degraded by microbes at wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), while some ATVs either require deep treatment to reduce concentration and toxicity. Parent and metabolites residing in effluent posed a varying degree of risk when entering the aquatic environment, while increasing the potential of natural reservoirs for environmentally acquired antiviral drug resistance potential. There is a rising research on the behavior of ATVs in the environment has surged since the pandemic. In the context of multiple viral diseases worldwide, especially during the current COVID-19 pandemic, a comprehensive assessment of the occurrence, removal, and risk of ATVs is urgently needed. This review aims to discuss the fate of ATVs in WWTPs from various regions in the world with wastewater as the main analyzing object. The ultimate goal is to focus on ATVs with high ecological impact and regulate their use or develop advanced treatment technologies to mitigate the risk to the environment.
ABSTRACT
Patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis have one of the highest COVID-19 mortality rates. The use of innovative methods capable of optimizing their treatment outcomes is important for clinical practice. Aims - to investigate the efficacy and safety of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies in COVID-19 patients treated with hemodialysis. Material and methods. We conducted a retrospective controlled single-center study with 102 COVID-19 patients on maintenance hemodialysis involved (M: 67;65.7%;W: 35;34.3%), aged 57.2+/-15.3 years. PCR-detected SARS-CoV-2 infection was diagnosed in all patients. Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies were administered to 69 patients, who formed the study group (group 1). The control group included 33 patients (group 2). The combination of bamlanevimab and etesevimab was the most frequent therapy used (in 59 patients). Results. In the course of the disease, group 1 patients, compared to those of group 2, had statistically significantly higher blood oxygen saturation values (94.2+/-5.7 vs 89.8+/-10.7);they required less frequent oxygen support (29.0 vs 54.5%) and ICU treatment (18.8 vs 48.5%), respectively. Fatal outcomes occurred in 4 (5.8%) of 69 patients who received neutralizing antibodies and in 6 (18.2%) of 33 patients who did not receive the therapy, p<0.05. Except for one patient, all other patients in both groups developed an unfavorable outcome due to progressive lung damage. However, only 4 of 6 (2/3) patients with progressive lung damage died in group 1, whereas the similar course of the disease proved fatal in all cases in group 2. Conclusion. The use of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies in hemodialysis patients is safe and effective when the drugs are administered early, the pulmonary process progression is insignificant and dominant SARSCoV-2 variants are sensitive to them.Copyright © 2022 Tomsk Polytechnic University, Publishing House. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Treatment of COVID-19 patients is an immense administrative as well as clinical challenge. The setting up of a dedicated COVID-19 care centre within a short time span, adequate manpower deployment, healthcare worker education and training, provision of facilities for donning and doffing and waste disposal were some of the unique administrative problems. On the other hand, as clinicians we faced enormous hurdles in attempting to treat a disease on which there was no established knowledge and no defined, well-proven treatment protocols and which could strike anyone, anywhere in myriad ways. Coupled with this difficulty in diagnosis and treatment was the challenge of serving COVID-19 patients of every age and clinical requirement, under one roof. Healthcare workers faced a tough time, handling physical discomfort while working for long hours in PPE, along with the fear and apprehension of contracting the infection in the line of duty, and carrying it back home. Mental health issues abounded, both amongst the patients and their caregivers, due to heightened fear, anxiety and loneliness. We share our experience in dealing with the pandemic, the administrative and clinical challenges we faced and some of the ways we overcame them. We further share some of the insights we gleaned from this experience, which may help in better preparation for the future. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021.