ABSTRACT
Objective: Although COVID-19 in childhood is often asymptomatic or has a more benign course, the safety of healthcare workers should be the primary goal because of the risk of contamination. In our study, we aimed to investigate the asymptomatic COVID-19 PCR positivity and its effect on the development of complications in emergency and non-deferred surgery cases that will help both the patient, the operating room and the health care workers. Material and Methods: This is a prospective study that was performed in patients under 18 years of age who were operated on due to emergency and urgent cases in the Ankara City Children's Hospital, which was serving as an anti-pandemic hospital. The patients were evaluated from May 1 to October 1, 2020. Of the 458 patients, 433 patients who met the criteria were included in the study. COVID-19 Nasopharyngeal swab (PCR) samples were taken from all patients along with preoperative examinations. Results: Of the 433 cases included in the study, 155 (33.5%) were girls and 278 (66.5%) were boys. It was determined that emergency cases constituted 389 (89.8%) of all cases. The most common emergency pathologies according to age groups were intestinal obstruction or atresia in the neonatal period, foreign body aspirations of the respiratory tract in the preschool period, and acute appendicitis in the school age. Nasal swab PCR results were positive in only four patients, this rate was found to be 0.9% in the entire study group, and postoperative complications and transmission to healthcare workers were detected at none. Conclusion: In this prospective study, low COVID-19 PCR positivity (0.9% prevalence) was detected in asymptomatic children scheduled for emergency or non-deferred surgery, and we believe that it will shed light on the planning of safe procedure practices.
ABSTRACT
Acute appendicitis is one of the most common general surgical emergencies worldwide; however, its diagnosis remains challenging, with a high proportion of negative appendicectomies. The purpose of this study was to investigate the benefit of routine use of pre-operative imaging for the evaluation of suspected appendicitis. This retrospective cohort study included all cases of appendicectomies performed for suspected acute appendicitis during the first and second peaks of the COVID-19 pandemic, between March 2020 and February 2021. The control group included all cases of appendicectomies performed for suspected acute appendicitis in the previous 12 months (March 2019-February 2020). One hundred and four patients underwent appendicectomy in the study group, compared to 209 in the control group, with similar gender distribution but a significantly higher median age in the study group (33 vs. 28, p = 0.001). The two groups had similar rates of perforation and similar median white cell count (WCC) and CRP. Imaging was used in 80.77% of the patients in the study group, compared to 61.72% in the control group (p = 0.001), with 55.77% of patients in the study group undergoing CT scans. Despite this, the negative appendicectomy rate (NAR) in the two groups did not differ significantly (11.54% vs. 15.79%, p = 0.320). The increase in the use of imaging for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic did not lead to a significantly lower negative appendicectomy rate. Registration: The study was pre-registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05205681).
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is the leading cause of acute abdominal pain that requires immediate intervention. Nonetheless, during COVID-19, hospital visits decreased as a result of serious COVID-19 concerns at that time, resulting in a decreased number of diagnosed cases with acute appendicitis due to COVID-19 restriction issues. OBJECTIVES: To report the percentage numbers, characteristics, applied management, and outcomes of patients with acute appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic and compare them to pre-COVID-19 cases. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study included all patients with acute appendicitis in the determined periods "pre-COVID-19" and "during COVID-19" at King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, Academic Tertiary Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Mean and standard deviation were used, while categorical data were reported as frequencies and percentages. Variables were analyzed by the Chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, and Mann-Whitney test as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 298 patients were included. The period of the pre-COVID-19 pandemic had 161 (54%) patients, while 137 (46%) were identified during COVID-19. The number of laparoscopic appendectomies performed during COVID-19 was less than the pre-COVID-19 pandemic of 96 cases (70.1%) vs 133 cases (82.6%) (P=0.0106). Uncomplicated appendicitis was the most commonly reported type of appendicitis in both periods: 113 (82.5%) during COVID-19 vs 135 (83.9%) pre-COVID-19, (P=0.7526). Furthermore, the number of patients who presented to the ER between 24 and 48 hours after the onset of symptoms was similar before and during the pandemic: 111 (68.9%) vs 89 (65%). CONCLUSION: Overall, we conclude that during the COVID-19 period, there was a reduction in the number of patients presenting with acute appendicitis and a lower chance of undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy due to COVID-19 restrictions. There was also an increase in perforated appendicitis and a decrease in gangrenous appendicitis.
ABSTRACT
Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most common surgical emergencies in children. Some reports have suggested that the COVID-19 pandemic was responsible for delays in the diagnostic and proper treatment of AA in pediatric patients. The aim of our study was to perform a retrospective study of cases of AA in children with SARS-CoV-2 infection treated in a highly endemic area for COVID-19 in Romania during a 2-year time interval. The SARS-CoV-2 infection had no unfavorable impact on children who presented with AA. Further data analysis should clarify the overall influence of COVID-19 on the management of surgical pediatric patients in such endemic areas.
Subject(s)
Appendicitis , COVID-19 , Humans , Child , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , Appendicitis/complications , Appendicitis/epidemiology , Appendicitis/surgery , Pandemics , Romania/epidemiology , Acute DiseaseABSTRACT
Objective: Although COVID-19 in childhood is often asymptomatic or has a more benign course, the safety of healthcare workers should be the primary goal because of the risk of contamination. In our study, we aimed to investigate the asymptomatic COVID-19 PCR positivity and its effect on the development of complications in emergency and non-deferred surgery cases that will help both the patient, the operating room and the health care workers. Material(s) and Method(s): This is a prospective study that was performed in patients under 18 years of age who were operated on due to emergency and urgent cases in the Ankara City Children's Hospital, which was serving as an anti-pandemic hospital. The patients were evaluated from May 1 to October 1, 2020. Of the 458 patients, 433 patients who met the criteria were included in the study. COVID-19 Nasopharyngeal swab (PCR) samples were taken from all patients along with preoperative examinations. Result(s): Of the 433 cases included in the study, 155 (33.5%) were girls and 278 (66.5%) were boys. It was determined that emergency cases constituted 389 (89.8%) of all cases. The most common emergency pathologies according to age groups were intestinal obstruction or atresia in the neonatal period, foreign body aspirations of the respiratory tract in the preschool period, and acute appendicitis in the school age. Nasal swab PCR results were positive in only four patients, this rate was found to be 0.9% in the entire study group, and postoperative complications and transmission to healthcare workers were detected at none. Conclusion(s): In this prospective study, low COVID-19 PCR positivity (0.9% prevalence) was detected in asymptomatic children scheduled for emergency or non-deferred surgery, and we believe that it will shed light on the planning of safe procedure practices. Copyright © 2021 Ankara Pediatric Hematology Oncology Training and Research Hospital. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Case Report: Patients with Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) can commonly present with gastrointestinal symptoms of abdominal pain, vomiting, or diarrhea. These symptoms along with high fever and elevated inflammatory markers can often mask underlying gastrointestinal inflammation and lead to a diagnostic dilemma. Case Presentation: We report a case of a 16-month-old with a history of exposure to SARS-Cov-2 virus, who presented with fever, cough, vomiting, and decreased activity. Her initial workup showed neutrophil-predominant leukocytosis with elevated CRP, ferritin, NTProBNP, and fibrinogen. Serology was positive for COVID-19 IgG antibodies, strongly favoring a diagnosis of MIS-C. Initial CT of the abdomen showed findings consistent with mild enteritis. Intravenous immunoglobulin was not administered as leukocytosis and all inflammatory markers except CRP improved during the course of her hospital stay with parenteral antibiotics, but she remained febrile with worsening abdominal symptoms. She then developed classic symptoms of peritonitis with tenderness and rigidity. Ultrasound of abdomen was inconclusive due to overlying bowel gas. Repeat CT of the abdomen showed multiple intra-abdominal abscesses with the largest rim enhancing lesion in the right lower quadrant. Her presentation was consistent with acute appendiceal abscess due to perforated appendix that improved with CT guided drainage and three weeks of intravenous antibiotics. She was then discharged and planned for an interval appendectomy after two weeks. [Figure presented] Conclusion(s): Symptoms of appendiceal abscess can mimic MIS-C. This case underscores the importance of considering appendicitis in the differential diagnosis in patients with MIS-C. Appendicitis can be missed in toddlers. Hence, clinical suspicion and repeat imaging is key for early diagnosis in this age group. CT Abdomen and Pelvis with intravenous and oral contrast showing findings of perforated, complicated acute appendicitis, with multiple abscesses. Copyright © 2023 Southern Society for Clinical Investigation.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Pediatric acute appendicitis (PAA) is a pathology with a high rate of diagnostic error. The search for new diagnostic tools is justified by the high morbidity and healthcare costs associated with diagnostic error. METHODS: We designed a prospective study to validate serum pentraxin-3 (PTX3) as a diagnostic tool in PAA. Participants were divided into three groups: (1) patients with no underlying pathology (2) patients with non-surgical abdominal pain and (3) patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PAA. For further analyses, patients in group 3 were divided into complicated or uncomplicated PAA. Quantitative variables were expressed as medians and interquartile ranges and categorical variables as percentages. Quantitative variables were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Diagnostic performance was evaluated with ROC curves. RESULTS: This study included 215 patients divided into group 1 (n = 63), group 2 (n = 53) and group 3 (n = 99). Median serum PTX3 values were 2.54 (1.70-2.95) ng/mL, 3.29 (2.19-7.64) ng/mL and 8.94 (6.16-14.05) in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p = 0.001). Patients with complicated PAA showed significantly higher values than patients with uncomplicated PAA (p = 0.04). The AUC (group 2 vs. 3) was 0.77 (95% CI 0.69-0.85) and the best cut-off point was at 7.28 ng/mL, with a sensitivity of 61.3% and a specificity of 73.1%. The AUC (complicated vs. uncomplicated PAA) was 0.65 (95% CI 0.54-0.77) and the best cut-off point was 12.33 ng/mL, with a sensitivity of 51.72% and a specificity of 72.73%. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic ability of serum PTX3 in PAA is only moderate and therefore it cannot be considered a definitive diagnostic test. The discriminatory ability of PTX3 between complicated and uncomplicated PAA is poor. These findings, which contrast with those reported to date, should be validated with future properly designed prospective studies.
Subject(s)
Appendicitis , Humans , Child , Prospective Studies , Appendicitis/diagnosis , Acute Disease , Abdominal Pain , Diagnostic ErrorsABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: Acute appendicitis is the most common abdominal emergency requiring surgery and it has an estimated lifetime risk of 6.7 to 8.6%. The COVID-19 pandemic has transformed medical care worldwide, influencing diagnostic tactics, treatment modalities and outcomes. Our study aims to compare and analyze management of acute appendicitis before and during the first and second waves of the pandemic. Materials and Methods: Patients suffering acute appendicitis were enrolled retrospectively in a single-center study for a 10-month period before the pandemic (pre-COVID-19 period: 1 March to 31 December 2019) and during the pandemic (COVID-19 period: 1 March to 31 December 2020). The total number of patients, disease severity, diagnostic methods, complications, length of hospitalization and outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total number of 863 patients were included, 454 patients in the pre-COVID-19 period and 409 patients in the COVID-19 period. Compared to the pre-COVID-19 period, the number of complicated appendicitis increased in the COVID-19 period (24.4% to 37.2%; p < 0.001). The proportion of laparoscopic appendectomies increased during the COVID-19 period but did not show statistically significant differences between periods. In both time periods, we found that open technique was the chosen surgical approach more frequently in elderly patients (p < 0.001). Generalized peritonitis was significantly more common during the COVID-19 period (3.5% vs. 6.1%, p < 0.001). The postoperative course of patients was similar in the pre-COVID-19 period and during the COVID-19 period, with no significant differences in ICU admissions, overall hospital stay or morbidity. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a significant increase in complicated forms of acute appendicitis; however, no significant impact was observed in terms of diagnostic or treatment approach.
Subject(s)
Appendicitis , COVID-19 , Humans , Aged , COVID-19/complications , Retrospective Studies , Pandemics , Appendicitis/surgery , Latvia , Universities , Hospitals , Acute DiseaseABSTRACT
Aim: During the COVID-19 pandemic, UK intercollegiate guidelines shifted to favour non-operative approach and open surgical approach when required in the management of acute appendicitis. The aim of this study was to assess diagnostic and management approaches during the COVID-19 peak and post-peak period and further evaluate short term patient outcomes. Method(s): A retrospective observational study was performed which included all patients with a clinical or radiological diagnosis of acute appendicitis during peak of COVID-19 (01/04/2020-30/ 06/2020) and post-peak (01/07/2020-30/ 09/2020). Patient demographics, clinical presentation, investigative findings, management approach and clinical outcomes were recorded by two observers. Result(s): Sample consisted of 188 patents (COVID peak N = 88;post-peak N = 102). There was no significant difference between baseline characteristics (age, ASA, F:M, biochemical markers, CT findings). The median duration of symptoms were 1.5 days during peak and 2 days post-peak. During COVID peak more imaging was performed to confirm the diagnosis (peak 69.3% vs post peak 57%;P = 0.081) with CT being the most common modality (N = 101, 76.5%). Majority of the patients were managed surgically during both periods (79.5% vs 81%). Conservative management failure rate was 27% (N = 10) (peak 27.8% vs post-peak 26.3%). More laparoscopic appendicectomies were performed during post-peak period (96.5% vs 65.3%;P < 0.001) and open appendicectomies were more frequent during peak (34.7% vs 3.4%;P < 0.001). There were no significant differences identified in patient outcomes between the two groups (P > 0.05). Only one patient developed mild COVID postoperatively. Less negative appendicectomies were performed during COVID peak (10.7% vs 16.5% post-peak). Conclusion(s): Laparoscopic appendicectomy remains to be a safe approach to manage acute appendicitis, even in 'time-limited' situations. Cross sectional imaging is a helpful tool in aiding the appropriate management plan in acute appendicitis cases.
ABSTRACT
Background: The literature highlights a decrease in surgical treated appendicitis with an increased severity during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of COVID lockdown on the population with appendicitis comparing clinical-pathologic data and outcome in two matching period (prepandemic and pandemic era). Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients admitted to two community urban hospital in Rome with diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) before and after the COVID-19 pandemic was performed. We compared patients patients with acute appendicitis in three groups named A (pre-COVID), B (early pandemic), and C (late pandemic). We evaluate the differences between the three groups in terms of onset of symptoms and severity, procedure difficulty, conversion rate, and short-term outcome. Results: A total of 310 patients were identified. The time interval from onset of symptoms to arrival in the emergency department was significantly longer in both pandemic group;there was also a significantly longer time to surgery comparing to group A. The risk of complicated AA was higher in both pandemic groups. A significantly higher grade of difficulty was detected in both COVID-groups. However, no differences were observed in conversion rate. Postoperative complications rate showed no significant difference among all three groups. No patients was tested positive for SARSCoV-2 postoperatively. Conclusion: AA treatment was comparable to pre-COVID period in-hospital presurgery stay and early postoperative outcome. With an accurate respect of pandemic protocol is possible to maintain a high and safe standard of care for patients with acute appendicitis. Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by on behalf of the Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani and Wolters Kluwer.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has deepened the existing health inequalities and has limited access to health services. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the care of AA in children at a single institution in Sfax, Tunisia. METHOD(S): We divided our patients into two groups: the first (COVID group) included patients who had surgery during covid-19 pandemic (between March 02, 2020, and December 31, 2020), while the second (pre-COVID group) included those who had appendectomy before the pandemic (between March 02, 2019, and December 31, 2019). RESULT(S): A total of 275 patients were included. The COVID-19 group included 136 patients and the pre- COVID-19 group 139 patients. Multivariate logistic analyses revealed that time from onset of abdominal pain to arrival to the emergency department was higher in COVID group patients (36 [24-48] hours vs 30 [12-48] hours, p-value = 0.023). Patients undergoing surgery during the COVID era had a significantly higher Alvarado score (7 [5-8] vs 6 [5-7], p value = 0.002). We have found no differences between the two study groups with respect to outcomes including length of hospital stay, re-admission rate, re-operation rate, and postoperative complications rate. CONCLUSION(S): this is the first study, in Tunisia, to assess the impact covid-19 pandemic on the care of AA in children. We suggest that strategies should be implemented to educate parents and to encourage them to seek for an emergent care of potentially serious conditions such as AA.
ABSTRACT
Background. Coinfection in patients with SARS-CoV-2 has been associated with greater complications. We describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of 126 pediatric patients with COVID-19 and viral, bacterial, or fungal coinfection. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed electronic data of all pediatric patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 from April 16, 2020, to April 15, 2022, in our center. Confirmation of COVID-19 was based on positive RT-PCR. Viral coinfections (VC) were identified using a multiplex RT-PCR respiratory viral panel, bacterial coinfection (BC) was determined by positive bacterial culture (blood, bronchoalveolar lavage, sputum, urine) or clinical/radiological manifestations and antimicrobial assessment by a pediatric Infectious Diseases expert and fungal coinfection (FC) diagnosis based on Consensus definitions of invasive fungal disease. Results. During the study period, among 400 pediatric patients with COVID-19, 126 children had coinfection. Children >10 years were the most affected age group. Underlying disease was present in 69%, hematological malignancies were the most common (17.5%). BC was detected in 76.9% (n=97), bacterial pneumonia (54.6%) was the main diagnosis, followed by oncologic patients with initial febrile neutropenia and posterior SARS-CoV-2 detection (14,4%). Unusual BC as congenital syphilis w detected;acute appendicitis was the initial presentation of COVID-19 in 8 patients. VC was identified in 15.87% (n=20), prevailing rhinovirus (9.5%) and adenovirus (3.96%), One FC presented as proven pulmonary aspergillosis (0.8%). B-V and B-F coinfection were detected in 2 patients. Fever and cough were the most common symptoms, higher fever >40degreeC was mostly observed in the BC group (3%). Twenty-seven patients with BC (27.8%) were admitted to intensive care, with the OR 0.7 IR 95% (0.611-1.008), 4.1% died. One ICU admission was observed in the VC group (5%) and all VC cases resolved without complications. Conclusion. Pediatric patients with COVID-19 coinfection, especially BC were common in our center representing nearly one-third of the infected children, including unusual coinfections. BC was identified as a risk factor for ICU admission OR 0.7 IR 95% (0.611-1.008). Favorable outcomes were observed in most cases.
ABSTRACT
Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most common cause of acute surgical abdominal pain in patients all over the world. Appendectomy (AE) is still associated with relatively high risk of surgical site infection (SSI), regardless of surgical technique and approach, de-spite decades of practice. The incidence of SSI is 7% overall, ranging from 0 to 37.4%. According to various authors, SSI risk factors can be: conversion, experience of the surgeon, the type of inflammation of the process and the timing of the disease, the severity of systemic inflammation, operations at night, some signs according to CT, the features of surgical technique, and even COVID-19. But neither of authors point the laparoscopic approach as an independent risk factor for SSI, however, some of them was hypothesized that carboxyperitoneum and thermal exposure of surgical energy can damage the mesothelium and promote the translocation of microorganisms. Modern methods for diagnosing and assessing SSI after AE are also considered in this re-view: computed and magnetic-resonance imaging, as well as ultrasound diagnostics also with elastography. Thoroughly adher-ence to international guidelines for the prevention of SSI can reduce it incidence, however world experience shows that the list of measures to reduce the risk of SSI development is not limited to this. The surgical community is off to develop clear guidelines for the prevention of early SSI after AE. © 2022, Media Sphera Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: The clinical course of acute appendicitis, one of the most common diseases needing surgical intervention in children, was affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The global fear and panic about the outbreak and governmental decisions on lockdowns and restrictions led to an increasing number of complicated forms of appendicitis. Objective(s): This study aimed to compare different aspects of appendicitis and its complications between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. Method(s): In a retrospective cross-sectional analytical study, we enrolled all patients with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis for two consecutive years. Only children under 14 years of age were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the time of disease presentation, the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. Demographic features, as well as clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings, were compared between the two groups. Result(s): Out of 369 patients included in the study, 173 were placed in the pre-pandemic group. There was no significant change in the incidence of appendicitis between the two periods (P = 0.232). However, the incidence of complicated appendicitis increased remarkably during the pandemic (27% vs. 11%, P < 0.001). No substantial differences were found in parameters like age, sex, laboratory findings, and the length of hospital stay between the two groups (P > 0.005). The patients who tested positive for COVID-19 had a significantly higher hospitalization duration (P < 0.001). Conclusion(s): Our results suggested that the rate of complicated appendicitis was substantially higher during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic time. Also, the proportion of midline laparotomy was significantly higher after the outbreak. These findings suggested that delays in care provision during the COVID-19 outbreak could have probably contributed to the rise in the incidence of complicated appendicitis in children. Copyright © 2023, Author(s).
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Global pandemics may limit access to specialized care, delaying diagnosis and treatment of common acute surgical diseases. We analyzed the impact of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on acute appendicitis at an urban tertiary care center. We hypothesize that pandemics are associated with delayed presentation and worsened clinical sequelae, specifically, higher incidences of perforation in children. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed patients admitted to our institution with acute appendicitis in pre-pandemic control (February 2018-June 2019) and COVID-19 (February 2020-June 2021) cohorts. Primary outcomes included complicated appendicitis rates (perforation/abscess/bowel obstruction), COVID-19 status, complications and travel distance to our institution. 1107 patients met inclusion criteria: 491 (44.4%) during the control period and 616 (55.6%) in the COVID-19 cohort. Statistical analysis involved t-tests, contingency tables and logistic regression modelling for key variables. RESULTS: A larger proportion of complicated appendicitis occurred during COVID-19 compared to controls (28.3% vs 38.8%, p < 0.001). Symptom duration at presentation and length of stay were not significantly different. Duration of antibiotic treatment, surgery length, readmission rate and travel distances were significantly higher during COVID-19. The pre-pandemic cohort had a significantly younger age distribution. CONCLUSION: Pediatric appendicitis was significantly impacted during COVID-19, demonstrated by increased rates of complicated appendicitis, surgery duration and antibiotic duration. This may be an unintended secondary consequence of patients avoiding healthcare facilities for non-pandemic related illnesses or lockdown policies. Government policies directing all provincial pediatric appendicitis cases to pediatric institutions increased travel distances for our patients and had unanticipated consequences and resource requirements on tertiary healthcare. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III for "Treatment Studies".
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic drove acute care surgeons to pivot from long established practice patterns. Early safety concerns regarding increased postoperative complication risk in those with active COVID infection promoted antibiotic-driven non-operative therapy for select conditions ahead of an evidence-base. Our study assesses whether active or recent SARS-CoV-2 positivity increases hospital length of stay (LOS) or postoperative complications following appendectomy. METHODS: Data were derived from the prospective multi-institutional observational SnapAppy cohort study. This preplanned data analysis assessed consecutive patients aged ≥ 15 years who underwent appendectomy for appendicitis (November 2020-May 2021). Patients were categorized based on SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity: no infection, active infection, and prior infection. Appendectomy method, LOS, and complications were abstracted. The association between SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity and complications was determined using Poisson regression, while the association with LOS was calculated using a quantile regression model. RESULTS: Appendectomy for acute appendicitis was performed in 4047 patients during the second and third European COVID waves. The majority were SARS-CoV-2 uninfected (3861, 95.4%), while 70 (1.7%) were acutely SARS-CoV-2 positive, and 116 (2.8%) reported prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. After confounder adjustment, there was no statistically significant association between SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity and LOS, any complication, or severe complications. CONCLUSION: During sequential SARS-CoV-2 infection waves, neither active nor prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with prolonged hospital LOS or postoperative complication. Despite early concerns regarding postoperative safety and outcome during active SARS-CoV-2 infection, no such association was noted for those with appendicitis who underwent operative management.
Subject(s)
Appendicitis , COVID-19 , Humans , Acute Disease , Appendectomy/methods , Appendicitis/surgery , Appendicitis/complications , Cohort Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , Length of Stay , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
The coronavirus infection presents primarily as a respiratory illness, however, extra-pulmonary manifestations are known to occur, including gastrointestinal manifestations. Hereby, we report three cases of the COVID-19 infection who presented with acute-onset abdominal pain during illness. All three patients had respiratory symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 and abdominal symptoms consistent with acute pancreatitis, acute cholecystitis, and acute appendicitis. All three patients improved in terms of acute abdominal pain; however, the overall clinical course, the three illnesses were variable because of differences in underlying organ involment and pathophysiology.
ABSTRACT
Acute appendicitis (AA) is cited as the leading cause of surgical acute abdomen in pediatrics and the most frequent urgent surgical pathology worldwide. For a long time, surgical appendectomy has been effectively used as the first-line treatment for AA. Other conservative management practices, such as the use of antibiotics, have been applied in the treatment of appendicitis. COVID-19 has had a significant impact on the surgical treatment strategies of AA in pediatrics, with many pediatric surgeons having to shift from upfront surgical appendectomy to conservative management involving the use of antibiotics as a treatment strategy. This meta-analysis compares the outcomes between appendectomy and conservative therapy in the management of AA during COVID-19 in pediatrics. Twenty-one articles fully met the inclusion criteria. Articles that were published more than five years ago were excluded from the analysis. Also, articles that included studies on the adult population were excluded. Results from various retrospective studies, prospective clinical controlled trials, correlational studies, and randomized clinical trials were analyzed. This study reveals that the use of antibiotics has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in the treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis. However, antibiotics have been shown to have some complications. Despite this being the case, the studies identified the potential of using antibiotics as a definitive treatment of uncomplicated AA in pediatrics. Further studies are required to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and recurrence of AA of this alternative treatment method.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic is a global disaster with millions of infections and deaths. Healthcare systems and services were significantly affected, necessitating adjustments. These included postponement of scheduled appointments and elective surgeries. During the pandemic, there was an increase in the number of acute appendicitis, gallstones, and hernia with a significant impact on the signs and symptoms of presenting problems due to prehospital delay. AIM: This study aims to measure the impacts of COVID-19 on patients with common surgical emergencies in King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Buraidah, Saudi Arabia. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study conducted at King Fahad Specialist Hospital in Buraidah, Saudi Arabia. We reviewed all medical records of patients diagnosed with common surgical emergencies (acute appendicitis, gallstones, and hernia) during a selected time of COVID-19 lockdown and compared it with a similar set period before the crisis as a control sample. All medical records were reviewed to find out the overall number of admissions, frequency of emergency department (ED) visits, duration of illness, picture of clinical presentation, intraoperative findings, course and duration of admission, and final pathology if any. RESULTS: A total of 322 patients were included in the study. Of these, 119 (37%) patients underwent surgery before COVID-19 while 203 (63%) patients underwent surgery during the pandemic. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis was 63.9% and 47.7%, hernia 27.7% and 34.6%, and gallstone was 8.4% and 17.7% for control and pandemic periods, respectively. The duration varied from 10 hours to two days and four hours to one month, seven hours to one day to eight hours to six months, and two hours to one day to seven hours to one and half a month for acute appendicitis, hernia, and gallstone in control and pandemic period, respectively. The mean length of stay for acute appendicitis was reduced from two days during the control period to one day during the pandemic period, from four to three days for gallstone, and for hernia, it remained three days for both the control and pandemic periods, respectively. Regarding the course of admission for acute appendicitis, the uneventful cases were reduced while an increase in uneventful cases for both hernia and gallstone was observed. CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a noticeable reduction in hospital visits. We observed an increase in the number of one-time visits and a reduction of three, four, and seven-time visits, which was attributed to the fact that patients have been reported to visit the hospital after a long time from the onset of symptoms with a higher chance of complication and subsequent surgeries. The number of acute appendicitis cases was reduced while the cases of hernia and gallstones increased significantly. The minimum period for the duration of acute illness for appendicitis was reduced in the pandemic period, while the minimum period for both gallstone and hernia was increased as both conditions could require conservative management. The mean length of hospital stay was reduced during the pandemic period, mainly due to the early discharge implemented in COVID-19 protocols to decrease the risk of infection. The severity of symptoms was increased due to the cancellation and delaying of surgeries.