ABSTRACT
Background: Critically ill COVID-19 patients have an elevated risk of experiencing hypercoagulable conditions. Currently, many COVID-19 patients have been administered anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapies to lower the risk of systematic thrombosis. Iliopsoas hematoma is a potentially fatal and rare complication of bleeding disorders or anticoagulation therapy which sometimes grows to become clinically significant. The main purpose of this case review is to emphasize the importance of diagnosing iliopsoas hematomas and the possibility of antiplatelet contribution to its development. Case Presentation: We are reporting a rare presentation of non-traumatic iliopsoas hematoma in a non-anticoagulated patient. The patient is a 59-year-old male, with known type-2 diabetes, on oral hypoglycemic medications, 3-weeks post-COVID-19. He had started aspirin 81 mg orally, once daily, to prevent thrombotic events associated with COVID 19 infection, with no anticoagulant use and no other medications. He came in through the ED, presenting with two weeks history of progressive right lower limb weakness in which an iliopsoas hematoma diagnosis was confirmed based on radiological investigation. Conclusion: The possibility of iliopsoas hematoma should be considered in non-anticoagulated patients with no inherited or acquired coagulation disorders presenting with limb weakness. The link between antiplatelet use in a COVID-19 patient and the development of soft tissue bleeding (e.g., iliopsoas hematoma) must be studied further. © 2022 [The Author/The Authors]
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To report three older male individuals, all homoplasmic for m.14484 T > C mutation in the ND6 gene, presenting onset of vision loss weeks‐months after covid vaccination. None reported a history of covid‐19 infection.Methods: All clinical data was extracted and reported here as a Case Series.Results: A 68 years old man (A) had a 3rd dose of BioNTech/Pfizer COVID‐19 vaccination on 1st Nov 2021. 10 days later his vision was 6/6 OD and 6/60 OS. By Dec 2021 VA was 6/36 OD and 6/60 OS. His nephew lost vision age of 18 years with LHON. In March 2022, visual acuities were HM OD and HM OS. In May 2022 visual acuity was HM OD, PL OS. He started on idebenone 300 mg tds.A 55 years old man (B) had a 1st dose Astra Zeneca COVID‐19 vaccination in mid Feb 2021. 12 days later, March 2021 he developed a Bell's Palsy and sensory neuropathy at the top of his legs, feet and upper arms, with difficulty walking. MRI showed enhanced optic nerves and enhanced lesions at C2. In April 2021, he lost vision in his right eye, followed by left eye in June 2021. By September 2021 vision was CF BEs. He started on idebenone 300 mg po tds. In May 2022 he was LogMAR @ 2 m 1.34 OD and MH OS.A 72 years old man (C) had his 2nd dose of BioNTech/Pfizer COVID‐19 vaccination in April 2021. In Sept 2021 he reported loss of vision in both eyes but could not date onset. He was the maternal cousin of individual B. In May 2022 vision was 3/60 OD CF OS. He started on idebenone 300 mg po tds.Conclusions: Adverse ocular events related to COVID‐19 vaccines are remarkable rare. There are >20 published case reports (~89 patients) of adverse ocular events within 28 days of COVID‐19 vaccination, with all three vaccines (Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Moderna). Reports incl. conjunctivitis, facial and abducens nerve palsy, CSR, uveitis, MEWDS, VKH, Graves' Disease, endothelial graft rejection, AAION and AZOOR. The role of vaccination in subsequent vision loss in those with underlying mitochondrial mutation is not clear.
ABSTRACT
Purpose>This paper intends to examine and evaluate the implementation and delivery of a discharge to assess pathway based on the UK Department of Health and Social Care Hospital Discharge Policy in relation to the quadruple aim of healthcare improvement: improving patient experience, reducing costs, benefiting the wider population and improving the work life of staff.Design/methodology/approach>Using a place based partnership in the south of England, 18 staff involved the delivery of discharge to assess and four patients who had recently been through the pathway were interviewed and the narratives analysed using a framework method.Findings>All four dimensions of the quadruple aim were felt to be positively impacted by the discharge to assess pathway in varying degrees. Staff described improvements to working lives;patients described a positive experience. There was no evidence of reduced costs and wider benefit through reduced length of stay was suggested rather than demonstrated. The study showed a need to ensure both information flows and discharge process are smooth, that there is sufficient community capacity and capability, a need for strong relationships and shared goals, for clarity of pathway and empowered staff, and for an avoidance of the over prescription of care.Originality/value>The revised discharge to assess pathway in England has been in place since 2020 and no other assessments of the pathway were found that related the changes to the quadruple aim framework.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Wellens' syndrome is known to be associated with left anterior descending artery occlusion that could lead to an extensive anterior wall myocardial infarction. Thus, emergency cardiac catheterization is needed. However, during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, it is recommended for hemodynamically stable acute coronary syndrome patients with COVID-19 infection to be treated conservatively in an isolated hospital ward. CASE PRESENTATION: We report an 85-year-old patient with chief complaints of typical, squeezing chest pain in the past 4 h. The patient had a high fever, dyspnea, sore throat, and fatigue for 3 days. He had previously come into contact with COVID-19 positive relatives. The patient was hemodynamically stable and pulmonary auscultation revealed coarse rales in the entire lung. Electrocardiography (ECG) evaluation during the pain episode showed non-specific ST-T changes in lead V2-V5. After sublingual nitrate was administered, ECG evaluation during the pain-free period revealed a biphasic T wave inversion in lead V2 and V3. Laboratory workup showed elevated cardiac marker and leucopenia with neutrophilia and lymphopenia. Rapid immunochromatographic test and initial severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) evaluation from nasopharyngeal swab showed negative results. However, radiographic evaluations suggest the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. While waiting for the second RT-PCR evaluation, the patient was diagnosed with Wellens' syndrome with suspected COVID-19 infection. The patient was treated conservatively according to national guidelines and scheduled for elective cardiac catheterization. On the third day, the patient felt better and insisted on being discharged home. Ten days after discharged, the patient died of myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: Emergency cardiac catheterization should be done for patient with Wellens' syndrome, regardless of the COVID-19 infection status.