A systematic approach for COVID-19 predictions and parameter estimation.

The world is currently facing a pandemic called COVID-19 which has drastically changed our human lifestyle, affecting it badly. The lifestyle and the thought processes of every individual have changed with the current situation. This situation was unpredictable, and it contains a lot of uncertainties. In this paper, the authors have attempted to predict and analyze the disease along with its related issues to determine the maximum number of infected people, the speed of spread, and most importantly, its evaluation using a model-based parameter estimation method. In this research the Susceptible-Infectious-Recovered model with different conditions has been used for the analysis of COVID-19. The effects of lockdown, the light switch method, and parameter variations like contact ratio and reproduction number are also analyzed. The authors have attempted to study and predict the lockdown effect, particularly in India in terms of infected and recovered numbers, which show substantial improvement. A disease-free endemic stability analysis using Lyapunov and LaSalle's method is presented, and novel methods such as the convalescent plasma method and the Who Acquires Infection From Whom method are also discussed, as they are considered to be useful in flattening the curve of COVID-19.

Antiviral Therapy of COVID-19.

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the scientific community has focused on prophylactic vaccine development. In parallel, the experience of the pharmacotherapy of this disease has increased. Due to the declining protective capacity of vaccines against new strains, as well as increased knowledge about the structure and biology of the pathogen, control of the disease has shifted to the focus of antiviral drug development over the past year. Clinical data on safety and efficacy of antivirals acting at various stages of the virus life cycle has been published. In this review, we summarize mechanisms and clinical efficacy of antiviral therapy of COVID-19 with drugs based on plasma of convalescents, monoclonal antibodies, interferons, fusion inhibitors, nucleoside analogs, and protease inhibitors. The current status of the drugs described is also summarized in relation to the official clinical guidelines for the treatment of COVID-19. In addition, here we describe innovative drugs whose antiviral effect is provided by antisense oligonucleotides targeting the SARS-CoV-2 genome. Analysis of laboratory and clinical data suggests that current antivirals successfully combat broad spectra of emerging strains of SARS-CoV-2 providing reliable defense against COVID-19.

Blood derivative therapy

There are three main components manufactured from whole blood: red blood cells (RBCs), plasma, and platelets. Plasma contains a multitude of different proteins, peptides, and biologic substances. Approximately 53 million liters of plasma was collected in the United States in 2019. Following collection, plasma is frozen and manufactured into plasma-derived medicinal products (PDMPs). During the manufacture process, several thousand plasma units are pooled for Cohn fractionation, which is based upon cold ethanol precipitation of proteins. The PDMPs are further prepared using ion exchange or affinity chromatography and additional steps to inactivate and remove infectious diseases such as viruses. Almost 20 different therapeutic plasma proteins are purified from plasma via these multi-step manufacturing processes. Interestingly, the demand for pharmaceutical plasma products, particularly intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) products, has been increasing. The manufacture and therapeutic role of blood derivatives particularly immunoglobulin therapy, Rh immunoglobulin (RhIG), COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) and hyperimmune globulins, albumin, clotting factors, fibrin sealants, and platelet rich plasma will be described.Copyright © 2022 AME Publishing Company. All Rights Reserved.

Safety of Pharmacotherapy in COVID-19 Patients: A Literature Review.

The safety of COVID-19 pharmacotherapy is a relevant issue, first of all, because of the current lack of experience with using particular medicinal products and with off-label prescribing. The aim of the study was to analyse information on potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and their predictors in etiology- and pathogenesis-oriented COVID-19 therapy. According to literature data, the main clinically significant risk factors for COVID-19 patients to develop an ADR are the duration of their hospital stay, combined use of antivirals, polypharmacy, and their history of drug allergies. The most common adverse reactions to antivirals, to virus-neutralising antibodies, and to human anti-COVID-19 immunoglobulin and convalescent plasma are, respectively, gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders;gastrointestinal disorders, neurological disorders, and allergic reactions;and transfusion reactions (fever, chills, etc.). For pathogenesis-oriented therapy with systemic glucocorticosteroids, the most characteristic ADR is hyperglycaemia. Janus kinase inhibitors and interleukin inhibitors are most often associated with gastrointestinal disorders and hypertransaminasemia;neutropenia is also characteristic of a number of interleukin inhibitors. Haemostatic adverse reactions to anticoagulants depend on the patient's dosing regimen and condition. Drug-drug interactions are a common problem in COVID-19 treatment, with the combination of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir showing the largest number of significant interactions attributed to their pharmacokinetics. Currently, there is data on the role of pharmacogenetic biomarkers in the safety and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 therapy. Thus, to improve the safety of COVID-19 therapy, an integrated approach is needed that will take into account both the clinical, demographic, and pharmacogenetic predictors of ADRs and the risk of drug-drug interactions.Copyright © 2023 Safety and Risk of Pharmacotherapy. All rights reserved.

SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with multiple myeloma: survey in 23 centers across Europe and USA

Introduction: Despite several studies, the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on patients with multiple myeloma remains uncertain. Material(s) and Method(s): We performed a survey that covered the period of the first and second waves of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic in 23 centers inseven countries. Out of 352 patients with myeloma and SARS-CoV-2, 23% died. Results/Conclusions: Logistic regression showed a lower risk of death among patients treated with proteasome inhibitor and a higher risk of death for those who had a severe or a very severe course of disease.Copyright © 2023 Sciendo. All rights reserved.

The Future of COVID-19: What Is Next in the Drug Pipeline

Objectives: Development of new and repurposed medicines in response to the COVID-19 pandemic has occurred at an unprecedented rate, resulting in a dynamic pipeline marked by significant challenges and successes. This analysis provides an overview of the vaccines and therapies undergoing clinical evaluation or with recent approval for the treatment and prevention of COVID-19 in global markets. Method(s): For this analysis, COVID-19 pipeline medicines are defined in three categories: vaccines, new treatments and repurposed medicines. GlobalData is the primary data source for this study, in addition to online databases from Health Canada, the US FDA, and the EMA. International markets examined include the US and geographic Europe (excluding Russia and Turkey). Result(s): As of November 2022, the global pipeline contained over 600 therapies and vaccines undergoing Phase I, II, III clinical trials or pre-registration for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. Preventive and repurposed medicines include antivirals, immunoglobulins, monoclonal antibodies, cellular therapies, and convalescent plasma. In Canada, twelve medicines, including six vaccines, have been approved for COVID-19. The number of global approvals is greater, with approximately 9 vaccines on the market in OECD countries. In addition to pre-exposure preventative therapies, manufacturers are also developing COVID-19 drugs to be used as prophylactic therapy. The analysis identifies new oral antiviral treatments and preventative therapies in the pipeline and under review in various jurisdictions globally. Conclusion(s): This research provides a clearer picture of the characteristics and evolution of the market for new and emerging COVID-19 medicines, which will help policy-makers and other stakeholders understand and anticipate the unique pressures of the COVID-19 pandemic.Copyright © 2023

Diminished Neutralization Capacity of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 in Donor Plasma Collected from January to March 2021.

The 50% plaque reduction neutralization assay (PRNT50) has been previously used to assess the neutralization capacity of donor plasma against wild-type and variant of concern (VOC) severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Emerging data suggest that plasma with an anti-SARS-CoV-2 level of ≥2 × 104 binding antibody units/mL (BAU/mL) protects against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 infection. Specimens were collected using a cross-sectional random sampling approach. For PRNT50 studies, 63 previously analyzed specimens by PRNT50 versus SARS-CoV-2 wild-type, Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta were analyzed by PRNT50 versus Omicron BA.1. The 63 specimens plus 4,390 specimens (randomly sampled regardless of serological evidence of infection) were also tested using the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant assay (anti-spike [S]; Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA; Abbott Quant assay). In the vaccinated group, the percentages of specimens with any measurable PRNT50 versus wild-type or VOC were wild type (21/25 [84%]), Alpha (19/25 [76%]), Beta (18/25 [72%]), Gamma (13/25 [52%]), Delta (19/25 [76%]), and Omicron BA.1 (9/25 [36%]). In the unvaccinated group, the percentages of specimens with any measurable PRNT50 versus wild type or VOC were wild-type SARS-CoV-2 (16/39 [41%]), Alpha (16/39 [41%]), Beta (10/39 [26%]), Gamma (9/39 [23%]), Delta (16/39 [41%]), and Omicron BA.1 (0/39) (Fisher's exact tests, vaccinated versus unvaccinated for each variant, P < 0.05). None of the 4,453 specimens tested by the Abbott Quant assay had a binding capacity of ≥2 × 104 BAU/mL. Vaccinated donors were more likely than unvaccinated donors to neutralize Omicron when assessed by a PRNT50 assay. IMPORTANCE SARS-CoV-2 Omicron emergence occurred in Canada during the period from November 2021 to January 2022. This study assessed the ability of donor plasma collected earlier (January to March 2021) to generate any neutralizing capacity against Omicron BA.1 SARS-CoV-2. Vaccinated individuals, regardless of infection status, were more likely to neutralize Omicron BA.1 than unvaccinated individuals. This study then used a semiquantitative binding antibody assay to screen a larger number of specimens (4,453) for individual specimens that might have high-titer neutralizing capacity against Omicron BA.1. None of the 4,453 specimens tested by the semiquantitative SARS-CoV-2 assay had a binding capacity suggestive of a high-titer neutralizing capacity against Omicron BA.1. These data do not imply that Canadians lacked immunity to Omicron BA.1 during the study period. Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is complex, and there is still no wide consensus on correlation of protection to SARS-CoV-2.

COVID-19 IN A PATIENT WITH GRANULOMATOSIS WITH POLYANGIITIS: MANAGEMENT TACTICS

Patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) cause extreme alertness during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, associated with many factors: the initial damage to the respiratory system (upper respiratory tract, lungs) and kidneys, immunosuppressive treatments, difficult prognosis of COVID-19 with the risk of AAV exacerbation. We present a clinical case of a moderate COVID-19 in a patient with granulomatosis with polyangiitis, who received anti-B cell therapy with rituximab (RTX) for a long time. Coronavirus pneumonia developed one year after RTX, while B-lymphocyte depletion persisted. In order to achieve an adequate antiviral immune response and prevent hyperinflammation, treatment was carried out with antiviral drugs, anticoagulants, convalescent plasma, human normal immunoglobulin, and interleukin-6 antagonist tocilizumab. Possible predictors of severe COVID-19 in patients with AAV are discussed.Copyright © 2023 Ima-Press Publishing House. All rights reserved.

The therapeutics, based on virus specific antibodies, for special prophylactic and current of COVID-19

The analyses of effectiveness of medical means of protection based on virus specific antibodies, intended for special prophylactic and current of COVID-19 is conducted. The plasma of patients, obtained from the blood takes the leading part among these prepares. It is concluded, that convalescents plasma, containing virus neutralizing antibodies, may be used for emergency prevention or in the early stages of the disease. A risk group, that primarily needs in such drugs for special prophylactics, is medical workers. The other prepares, based on virus specific antibodies, including purified prepares of monoclonal antibodies, that may have certain advantages to convalescent's plasma due to their safety and high activity, due to complexity of their production and presumably high cost are unlikely to be available in the near future for mass use in the practice of medicine. The use of convalescents plasma for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19.can be based on the experience of their application in specialized medical centers and summarizing data from randomized clinical trials.Copyright © 2021 Moscow State University of Psychology and Education. All right reserved.

A Descriptive, Retrospective Analysis of Covid-19 Antibody Therapy and Its Effects on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients Receiving B-Lymphocyte Depleting Therapies

Intro: Patients receiving B-cell depleting or inhibiting therapies (BCDT), such as anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (CD20-MAB), are at risk for severe COVID-19. BCDT decreases production of neutralizing antibodies, causing delayed viral clearance and prolonged viral shedding. Passive antibody therapy (PAT), including COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) and monoclonal antibodies (MAB), is hypothesized to be an effective Findings: * At the time of treatment, all patients (19/19) receiving CCP were hospitalized compared with10/53 patients treated with MAB. 2/10(20%) hospitalized patients treated with MAB died, compared with 3/19(15%) treated with CCP. **5/43 patients treated outpatient with MAB were hospitalized for COVID following CCP/MAB treatment with no COVID related deaths. Conclusion(s): Our data suggest that patients with COVID-19 who received BCDT within the last year may have improved outcomes after treatment with MAB or CCP. Elderly patients with >3 comorbidities and underlying hematological malignancy who contracted COVID-19 within 30 days of last BCDT had increased morbidity and mortality. To improve clinical outcomes, passive antibody therapy should be administered prior to the development of severe disease requiring hospitalization. Further prospective studies and comparisons to COVID-19 patients that did not receive MAB or CCP are needed to help confirm this association.Copyright © 2023

Inflammatory profile of convalescent plasma to treat COVID: Impact of amotosalen/UVA pathogen reduction technology.

Blood products in therapeutic transfusion are now commonly acknowledged to contain biologically active constituents during the processes of preparation. In the midst of a worldwide COVID-19 pandemic, preliminary evidence suggests that convalescent plasma may lessen the severity of COVID-19 if administered early in the disease, particularly in patients with profound B-cell lymphopenia and prolonged COVID-19 symptoms. This study examined the influence of photochemical Pathogen Reduction Treatment (PRT) using amotosalen-HCl and UVA light in comparison with untreated control convalescent plasma (n= 72 - paired samples) - cFFP, regarding soluble inflammatory factors: sCD40L, IFN-alpha, IFN-beta, IFN-gamma, IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-18, TNF-alpha and ex-vivo inflammatory bioactivity on endothelial cells. We didn't observe significant modulation of the majority of inflammatory soluble factors (8 of 10 molecules tested) pre- or post-PRT. We noted that IL-8 concentrations were significantly decreased in cFFP with PRT, whereas the IL-18 concentration was increased by PRT. In contrast, endothelial cell release of IL-6 was similar whether cFFP was pre-treated with or without PRT. Expression of CD54 and CD31 in the presence of cFFP were similar to control levels, and both were significant decreased in when cFFP had been pre-treated by PRT. It will be interesting to continue investigations of IL-18 and IL-8, and the physiopathological effect of PRT- treated convalescent plasma and in clinical trials. But overall, it appears that cFFP post-PRT were not excessively pro-inflammatory. Further research, including a careful clinical evaluation of CCP-treated patients, will be required to thoroughly define the clinical relevance of these findings.

Association of gut microbial dysbiosis with disease severity, response to therapy and disease outcomes in Indian patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with systemic hyper-inflammation. An adaptive interaction between gut microbiota and host immune systems is important for intestinal homeostasis and systemic immune regulation. The association of gut microbial composition and functions with COVID-19 disease severity is sparse, especially in India. We analysed faecal microbial diversity and abundances in a cohort of Indian COVID-19 patients to identify key signatures in the gut microbial ecology in patients with severe COVID-19 disease as well as in response to different therapies. The composition of the gut microbiome was characterized using 16Sr RNA gene sequences of genomic DNA extracted from faecal samples of 52 COVID-19 patients. Metabolic pathways across the groups were predicted using PICRUSt2. All statistical analyses were done using Vegan in the R environment. Plasma cytokine abundance at recruitment was measured in a multiplex assay. RESULTS: The gut microbiome composition of mild and severe patients was found to be significantly different. Immunomodulatory commensals, viz. Lachnospiraceae family members and Bifidobacteria producing butyrate and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), were under represented in patients with severe COVID-19, with an increased abundance of opportunistic pathogens like Eggerthella. The higher abundance of Lachnoclostridium in severe disease was reduced in response to convalescent plasma therapy. Specific microbial genera showed distinctive trends in enriched metabolic pathways, strong correlations with blood plasma cytokine levels, and associative link to disease outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that, along with SARS-CoV-2, a dysbiotic gut microbial community may also play an important role in COVID-19 severity through modulation of host immune responses.

Plasma after both SARS-CoV-2 boosted vaccination and COVID-19 potently neutralizes BQ.1.1 and XBB.1.

Recent 2022 SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants, have acquired resistance to most neutralizing anti-Spike monoclonal antibodies authorized, and the BQ.1.* sublineages are notably resistant to all authorized monoclonal antibodies. Polyclonal antibodies from individuals both vaccinated and recently recovered from Omicron COVID-19 (VaxCCP) could retain new Omicron neutralizing activity. Here we reviewed BQ.1.* virus neutralization data from 920 individual patient samples from 43 separate cohorts defined by boosted vaccinations (Vax) with or without recent Omicron COVID-19, as well as infection without vaccination (CCP) to determine level of BQ.1.* neutralizing antibodies and percent of plasma samples with neutralizing activity. More than 90 % of the plasma samples from individuals in the recently (within 6 months) boosted VaxCCP study cohorts neutralized BQ.1.1, and BF.7 with 100 % neutralization of WA-1, BA.4/5, BA.4.6 and BA.2.75. The geometric mean of the geometric mean 50 % neutralizing titres (GM (GMT50) were 314, 78 and 204 for BQ.1.1, XBB.1 and BF.7, respectively. Compared to VaxCCP, plasma sampled from COVID-19 naïve subjects who also recently (within 6 months) received at least a third vaccine dose had about half of the GM (GMT50) for all viral variants. Boosted VaxCCP characterized by either recent vaccine dose or infection event within 6 months represents a robust, variant-resilient, neutralizing antibody source against the new Omicron BQ.1.1, XBB.1 and BF.7 variants.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of convalescents boosts neutralization capacity against Omicron subvariants BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5 and can be predicted by anti-S antibody concentrations in serological assays.

Background: Recent data on immune evasion of new SARS-CoV-2 variants raise concerns about the efficacy of antibody-based COVID-19 therapies. Therefore, in this study the in-vitro neutralization capacity against SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1 and the Omicron subvariants BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5 of sera from convalescent individuals with and without boost by vaccination was assessed. Methods and findings: The study included 313 serum samples from 155 individuals with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, divided into subgroups without (n=25) and with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (n=130). We measured anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentrations by serological assays (anti-SARS-CoV-2-QuantiVac-ELISA (IgG) and Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S) and neutralizing titers against B.1, BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5 in a pseudovirus neutralization assay. Sera of the majority of unvaccinated convalescents did not effectively neutralize Omicron sublineages BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5 (51.7%, 24.1% and 51.7%, resp.). In contrast, 99.3% of the sera of superimmunized individuals (vaccinated convalescents) neutralized the Omicron subvariants BA.1 and BA.5 and 99.6% neutralized BA.2. Neutralizing titers against B.1, BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5 were significantly higher in vaccinated compared to unvaccinated convalescents (p<0.0001) with 52.7-, 210.7-, 141.3- and 105.4-fold higher geometric mean of 50% neutralizing titers (NT50) in vaccinated compared to unvaccinated convalescents. 91.4% of the superimmunized individuals showed neutralization of BA.1, 97.2% of BA.2 and 91.5% of BA.5 with a titer ≥ 640. The increase in neutralizing titers was already achieved by one vaccination dose. Neutralizing titers were highest in the first 3 months after the last immunization event. Concentrations of anti-S antibodies in the anti-SARS-CoV-2-QuantiVac-ELISA (IgG) and Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S assays predicted neutralization capacity against B.1 and Omicron subvariants BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5. Conclusions: These findings confirm substantial immune evasion of the Omicron sublineages, which can be overcome by vaccination of convalescents. This informs strategies for choosing of plasma donors in COVID-19 convalescent plasma programs that shall select specifically vaccinated convalescents with very high titers of anti-S antibodies.

Efficacy of convalescent plasma therapy for COVID-19 in Japan: An open-label, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Convalescent plasma is a potential therapeutic option for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Despite its use for treating several viral infections, we lack comprehensive data on its efficacy against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial of convalescent plasma therapy with high neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 in high-risk patients within five days after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms. The primary endpoint was the time-weighted average change in the SARS-CoV-2 viral load in nasopharyngeal swabs from days 0-5. RESULTS: Between February 24, 2021, and November 30, 2021, 25 patients were randomly assigned to either convalescent plasma (n = 14) or standard of care (n = 11) groups. Four patients discontinued their allocated convalescent plasma, and 21 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The median interval between the symptom onset and plasma administration was 4.5 days (interquartile range, 3-5 days). The primary outcome of the time-weighted average change in the SARS-CoV-2 viral load in nasopharyngeal swabs did not significantly differ between days 0-5 (1.2 log10 copies/mL in the convalescent plasma vs. 1.2 log10 copies/mL in the standard of care (effect estimate, 0.0 [95% confidence interval, -0.8-0.7]; P = 0.94)). No deaths were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The early administration of convalescent plasma with high neutralizing activity did not contribute to a decrease in the viral load within five days compared with the standard of care alone.

Lack of a prompt normalization of immunological parameters is associated with long-term care and poor prognosis in COVID-19 affected patients receiving convalescent plasma: a single center experience.

OBJECTIVES: Being COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) a therapeutic option that can have a potential impact on the normalization of immunological parameters of COVID-19 affected patients, a detailed analysis of post-infusion immunological changes was conducted in CCP treated patients, aiming to identify possible predictive hallmarks of disease prognosis. METHODS: This prospective observational study describes a cohort of 28 patients who received CCP shortly after being hospitalized for COVID-19 and diagnosed for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. All patients were subjected to a detailed flow cytometry based evaluation of immunological markers at baseline and on days +3 and +7 after transfusion. RESULTS: At baseline almost all patients suffered from lymphopenia (25/28 on T-cells and 16/28 on B-cells) coupled with neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio exceeding normal values (26/28). Lymphocyte subsets were generally characterized by increased percentages of CD19+CD20-CD38hiCD27+ plasmablasts and reduction of CD4+CD45RA+CCR7+CD31+ recent thymic emigrants, while monocytes presented a limited expression of CD4 and HLA-DR molecules. Amelioration of immunological parameters began to be evident from day +3 and became more significant at day +7 post-CCP transfusion in 18 patients who recovered within 30 days from hospitalization. Conversely, baseline immunological characteristics generally persisted in ten critical patients who eventually progressed to death (6) or long-term care (4). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that proper immunophenotyping panels can be potentially useful for monitoring CCP treated patients from the first days after infusion in order to presume higher risk of medical complications.

Convalescent plasma therapy in COVID-19: Unravelling the data using the principles of antibody therapy.

INTRODUCTION: When the COVID-19 pandemic struck no specific therapies were available and many turned to COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP), a form of antibody therapy. The literature provides mixed evidence for CCP efficacy. AREAS COVERED: PubMed was searched using the words COVID-19 and convalescent plasma and individual study designs were evaluated for adherence to the three principles of antibody therapy, i.e. that plasma 1) contain specific antibody; 2) have enough specific antibody to mediate a biological effect; and 3) be administered early in the course of disease. Using this approach, a diverse and seemingly contradictory collection of clinical findings was distilled into a consistent picture whereby CCP was effective when used according to the above principles of antibody therapy. In addition, CCP therapy in immunocompromised patients is useful at any time in the course of disease. EXPERT OPINION: CCP is safe and effective when used appropriately. Today, most of humanity has some immunity to SARS-CoV-2 from vaccines and infection, which has lessened the need for CCP in the general population. However, COVID-19 in immunocompromised patients is a major therapeutic challenge, and with the deauthorization of all SARS-CoV-2-spike protein-directed monoclonal antibodies, CCP is the only antibody therapy available for this population.

Antiphospholipid antibodies in convalescent plasma of donors recovered from mild COVID-19 infection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Passive immunization by the infusion of convalescent plasma (CP) obtained from patients who have recently recovered from COVID-19, thus having antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, is a potential strategy to reduce the severity of illness. A high prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA) in patients with COVID-19 has been reported during the pandemic, raising a concern whether the use of CP could increase the risk of thrombosis in transfused patients. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of APLA in COVID-19 CP (CCP) in order to assess the potential prothrombotic influence of transfused CCP to COVID-19 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied the prevalence of APLA in 122 CCP samples collected from healthy donors who recovered from mild-COVID-19 at two time periods: September 2020-January 2021 (defined as 'early period' samples) and April-May 2021 (defined as 'late period' samples). Thirty-four healthy subjects unexposed to COVID-19 were used as controls. RESULTS: APLA were present in 7 of 122 (6%) CCP samples. One donor had anti-ß2-glycoprotein 1(anti-ß2GP1) IgG, one had anti-ß2GP1 IgM and five had lupus anticoagulant (LAC) using silica clotting time (SCT), all in 'late period' donors. In the control group, one subject had anti-ß2GP1 IgG, two had LAC using dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) and four had LAC SCT (both LAC SCT and LAC dRVVT in one subject). CONCLUSION: The low prevalence of APLA in CCP donors reassures the safety of CCP administration to patients with severe COVID-19.

Convalescent Plasma Treatment of Severe Covid-19 Cases in the Bronx, Ny

Junior Physician Investigator Award Recipient Purpose of study Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus- 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the causative agent of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Convalescent plasma obtained from recovered persons was used for previous respiratory pandemics. Convalescent plasma with severe acute respiratory disease coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies (CCP) was proposed as an option that may hold promise as treatment for COVID-19. Our aim was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of CCP treatment of patients with severe to life-threatening COVID-19 hospitalized at Montefiore Medical Center (MMC) in the Bronx, NY between April 13 to May 4, 2020. Methods used We administered CCP as part of the Mayo Clinic expanded access investigational new drug (IND) program for hospitalized patients. We compared the mortality and clinical outcome of 73 patients with COVID-19 who received 200 mL of CCP with a Spike protein IgG titer >=1:2,430 (median 1:47,385) within 72 hours of admission to 1:1 propensity score-matched controls. Matching criteria for controls were age, sex, body mass index, race, ethnicity, comorbidities, week of admission, oxygen requirement, D-dimer, lymphocyte counts, corticosteroids, and anticoagulation use (figure 1). We additionally measured Spike protein IgG and neutralizing antibody titer in CCP and pre- and post-transfusion Spike protein IgG, IgM and IgA titer in CCP recipients. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at day 28 post-CCP. The secondary outcomes were improvement in oxygenation status or mortality at day 28 post-CCP. Exploratory outcomes were associations between pre-CCP SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers and mortality at day 28. Summary of results There was no difference in mortality or oxygenation between CCP recipients and controls at day 28. When stratified by age, compared to matched controls, CCP recipients < 65 years had 4-fold lower mortality and 4-fold lower deterioration in oxygenation or mortality at day 28 (figure 2, 3). There was no association between CCP IgG or neutralizing antibody titer and clinical outcome. For CCP recipients, pre-transfusion Spike protein IgG, IgM and IgA titers were associated with mortality at day 28 in univariate analyses but not in multivariable analyses. Pre-transfusion Spike protein IgG titer was significantly correlated with Ddimer and detected viral load measured by cycle threshold (Ct) value of nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 reverse-transcriptase- polymerase-chain-reaction (figure 4). No adverse effects of CCP were observed. Conclusions We report that CCP administration within 72 hours of hospitalization demonstrated a possible signal of reduced mortality in patients < 65 years. Pre-transfusion IgG titer may be a proxy for disease severity that may be useful in identifying those who are more likely to respond to CCP. Data from controlled trials is needed to validate this finding and establish the effect of ageing on CCP efficacy. (Figure Presented).