ABSTRACT
Objectives: We aimed at examining whether patients with rheumatological conditions receiving chronic hydroxychloroquine therapy are at a lower risk of developing SARS-CoV-2 infection than those not receiving hydroxychloroquine. Method(s): This historical cohort study included information of all patients aged 18 years or older with rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or associated rheumatological conditions (based on International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition, diagnostic codes). A propensity score was calculated for each patient, and each patientwho was receiving hydroxychloroquine was matched to two patients who were not receiving hydroxychloroquine (controls). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection among those receiving chronic hydroxychloroquine versus the propensity-matched patients not receiving chronic hydroxychloroquine in 2021. Result(s): 322 patients receiving hydroxychloroquine and 645 patients not receiving hydroxychloroquine were included in the primary analysis. The incidence of active SARS-CoV-2 infections during the study period did not differ between patients receiving hydroxychloroquine and patients not receiving hydroxychloroquine ( [0 3%] vs 78 [0 4%] of 21406;odds ratio 0 79, 95% CI 0 52-1 20, p = 0 27). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between the two groups of patients who developed active SARS-CoV-2 infection. For all patients in the study, overall mortality was lower in the hydroxychloroquine group than in the group of patients who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (odds ratio hydroxychloroquine was not associated with the development of active SARS-CoV-2 infection (odds ratio 0 79, 95% CI 0 51-1 42) Conclusion(s): Hydroxychloroquine was not associated with a protective effect against SARS-CoV-2 infection in a large group of patients with rheumatological conditions.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Chronic Inflammatory Immune-mediated Diseases (CIMD) can cause pain and severe discomfort to the patient, leading to significant reductions in his/her quality of life. Vaccination against COVID-19 has proven to be an efficient method in preventing cases and serious repercussions. However, there is insufficient evidence on the safety of these vaccines in the CIMD population. Objective(s): To assess disease activity in adolescent patients with CIMD after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Method(s): Observational, longitudinal, ambidirectional study with follow-up of groups of adolescent patients with CIMDwho received the vaccine provided by the National Immunization Program -Pfizer/BioNTech. Sociodemographic and clinical disease activity data were collected before and after each vaccine dose. Data were stored through an online platform (REDCap). This study is associated to the SAFER Project from the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology and was approved by the local Research Ethics Committee. Result(s): Nineteen adolescents aged between 12 and 17 years were included, all of whom met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Of the total, 31.6% have Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA)-14.33 +/- 2.25 years of age, whose subtypes included persistent oligoarticular JIA (16.7%), Polyarticular Rheumatoid Factor (RF) negative (33.3%), Polyarticular RF positive (16.7%) and Systemic (33.3%);68.4% have Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) -14.77 +/- 1.96 years of age. Regarding JIA patients, at inclusion, the mean disease activity assessed by the physician was 3 +/- 3.83 and 3.25 +/- 3.77 as assessed by the patient. After the 1st dose, the mean activity assessed by the physician was 2.8 +/- 3.9 and after the 2nd dose it was 3 +/- 4.24. Themean activity after the first dose as assessed by the patient was 3.2 +/- 3.96, and after the 2nd dose it was 2.8 +/- 3.11. In the SLE patients, at inclusion, the mean degree of disease activity was 1.92 +/- 1.83 and of the SLEDAI-2 K was 4.67 +/- 5.14. After the 1st dose, the mean disease activity was 1.11 +/- 1.96, and after the 2nd dose, it was 2.25 +/- 2.76. After the 1st dose, the SLEDAI-2 K was 1.11 +/- 1.76, and after the 2nd dose it was 4.25 +/- 5.28. No reports of worsening of disease activity after the vaccine were found. Conclusion(s): The vaccination proved not to contribute to worsening of clinical activity of rheumatic diseases in adolescents, without significant changes in SLE assessment indices and in the personal and medical assessment of JIA patients.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: In the Chronic Inflammatory Immune-mediated Diseases (CIMD), infections mainly occur in the respiratory tract and their occurrence is related to drug-induced immunosuppression, underlying diseases and comorbidities. To reduce this morbidity and mortality, vaccination is an effective means of prevention. However, the available studies on SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have not addressed this group of patients with CIMD, and there are still many doubts regarding the indications, adverse effects, safety and efficacy of these vaccines. Objective(s): to evaluate the adverse effects of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in adolescent patients with CIMD. Method(s): Research associated to the SAFER Project from Brazilian Society of Rheumatology. It is an observational, longitudinal, ambidirectional study, with follow-up of groups of vaccinated adolescent patients with CIMD, vaccine by Pfizer/BioNTech. Sociodemographic data were collected, stored on an online platform, and adverse events were presented by filling in diaries issued for each patient. This study was approved by the local Research Ethics Committee. Result(s): We included 19 adolescents, aged between 12 to 17 years, who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The mean age was 14.63 +/- 2.01 years. Of these, 68.4% were female. In relation to CIMD, 31.6% have Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and 68.4% have Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. All were vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine. In the 1st dose, the main adverse effects presented were Pain at the injection site (85.7%), Headache (42.9%), Tiredness (33.3%) and Edema and skin induration at the injection site (26, 7%). After the 2nd dose, the only adverse effect reported was Pain at the injection site (57.1%), with no other complaints. Conclusion(s): The adverse effects reported are of mild tomoderate reactogenicity;no serious adverse events were reported.
ABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 vaccines were developed unprecedentedly and have proven safe and efficacious in reducing transmissibility and severe infection. The impact of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines on atrial arrhythmias (AA) incidence is unknown. Objective(s): To analyze the incidence of AA after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). Method(s): BIOTRONIK Home Monitoring data and Medicare claims data from CERTITUDE patients implanted with a CIED between 2010-20 were utilized to identify recipients of one or more doses of the COVID-19 vaccine in 2021. Those who had influenza vaccination in 2020 were also identified in the same cohort as a control. From remote monitoring data, the number of atrial high rate events (AHR) and % burden of AA in the three months post-vaccination was compared to the preceding three months using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Kruskal-Wallis test was used for group difference comparisons. New AF diagnosis was determined from ICD-10 diagnosis codes in Medicare claims. Result(s): First and 2nd doses of COVID vaccine (50% Pfizer, 47% Moderna, and 3% J&J) were administered to 7757 and 6579 individuals with a CIED (age 76.2 (+/-9.0) y, 49% males), respectively. In the same cohort, 4723 (61%) individuals received the influenza vaccine. A statistically significant increase in the number of AHR episodes and % burden of AA was noted in the three months post-vaccination compared to the preceding three months after the 1st and 2nd doses of the COVID-19 vaccine (Figure). No such association was noted following influenza vaccination. In subgroup analysis, AHR episodes increased significantly in age groups >70 and men. Post-vaccination increase in AHR episodes was more significant in those without a pre-vaccination history of AHR episodes (mean increase of AHR 6.9+/-88.4, p<0.001) and was non-significant in those with a preceding history of AHR (p=0.8). Among the 764 patients with no AF diagnosis in claims preceding the first COVID-19 vaccine, 87 (11.4%) developed a new AF diagnosis or AHR event in the first three months post-vaccination. Conclusion(s): We report a small but significant increase in the number of CIED-detected atrial arrhythmias following vaccination for COVID-19 but not influenza, specifically in men and age >70 years. Acknowledging the immense public health benefit of COVID-19 vaccines, our results should prompt increased awareness of evaluating for AF in this high-risk group following vaccination. [Formula presented]Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Monitoring of the proportion of immune individuals and the effectiveness of vaccination in a population involves evaluation of several important parameters, including the level of virus-neutralising antibodies. In order to combat the COVID-19 pandemic, it is essential to develop approaches to detecting SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibodies by safe, simple and rapid methods that do not require live viruses. To develop a test system for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that detects potential neutralising antibodies, it is necessary to obtain a highly purified recombinant receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike (S) protein with high avidity for specific antibodies. The aim of the study was to obtain and characterise a SARSCoV-2 S-protein RBD homodimer and a recombinant RBD-expressing cell line, as well as to create an ELISA system for detecting potential neutralising antibodies. Material(s) and Method(s): the genetic construct was designed in silico. To generate a stable producer cell line, the authors transfected CHO-S cells, subjected them to antibiotic pressure, and selected the optimal clone. To isolate monomeric and homodimeric RBD forms, the authors purified the recombinant RBD by chromatographic methods. Further, they analysed the activity of the RBD forms by Western blotting, bio-layer interferometry, and indirect ELISA. The analysis involved monoclonal antibodies GamXRH19, GamP2C5, and h6g3, as well as serum samples from volunteers vaccinated with Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V) and unvaccinated ones. Result(s): the authors produced the CHO-S cell line for stable expression of the recombinant SARS-CoV-2 S-protein RBD. The study demonstrated the recombinant RBD's ability to homodimerise after fed-batch cultivation of the cell line for more than 7 days due to the presence of unpaired cysteines. The purified recombinant RBD yield from culture broth was 30-50 mg/L. Monomeric and homodimeric RBD forms were separated using gel-filtration chromatography and characterised by their ability to interact with specific monoclonal antibodies, as well as with serum samples from vaccinated volunteers. The homodimeric recombinant RBD showed increased avidity for both monoclonal and immune sera antibodies. Conclusion(s): the homodimeric recombinant RBD may be more preferable for the analysis of levels of antibodies to the receptor-binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein.Copyright © 2023 Authors. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Acute-phase proteins are a family of proteins synthesized by the liver. With this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of COVID-19 infection on acute phase reactants (AFR) and determine the usability of AFRs as prognostic factors in COVID-19 disease. Material(s) and Method(s): Serum samples taken for routine analysis of the patients admitted to the Emergency Department and diagnosed with COVID-19, were used. AFR levels of 30 patients who resulted in mortality and 30 recovered patients were evaluated. C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin (FER), ceruloplasmin (Cp), albumin (Alb), prealbumin (Prealb), transferrin (Trf), lactate, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE), and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) assessment was performed. Result(s): The hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval for FER, CRP, lactate, Alb, Cp, Prealb, Trf, Age, SOFA, and APACHE were 1.001 (1.000-1.001), 1.005 (1.001- 1.008), 1.141 (1.016-1.243), 1.016 (0.740-1.399), 1.016 (0.740-1.399), 1.056 (1.017-1.100), 0.978 (0.917-1.035), 1.000 (0.995-1.006), 1.032 (1.004- 1.064), 1.104 (0.971-1.247), and 1.012 (0.974-1.051), respectively, in univariable model. Only CRP, lactate, and FER found significant in multivariable model. In addition, patients in the nonsurvivors group had significantly higher FER, CRP, lactate, APACHE, age, and SOFA. Nonsurvivors also had lower Alb, Prealb, and serum Trf level compared to survivors. Conclusion(s): CRP, lactate, and FER, which we have shown to be significantly higher in severe COVID-19 patients, will be valuable parameters that will contribute to clinical improvement if they are used in the follow-up of patients due to their easy measurement and predictive values.Copyright © 2023, Nobelmedicus. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
A prerequisite for effective vaccination is the formation of proper collective immunity in society. The attitudes of healthcare professionals towards vaccination directly impact the population's adherence to this method. Objective. To study the attitude of healthcare professionals toward COVID-19 vaccination. Material and methods. The sociological survey method with the author's questionnaire based on GoogleForm was used. In the sur-vey, 450 physicians aged 25 to 70 participated voluntarily. It was a cross-sectional study carried out in the autumn of 2021. Results. Of those surveyed, the majority (86.8%) of physicians and almost all (96.1%) nurses were vaccinated against COVID-19. When studying the motivation for vaccine prophylaxis, a direct average strength of a statistically significant correlation between the adherence to COVID-19 vaccination and the emergence of a sense of safety was established (rxy =0.346;p<0.05). The most common reasons for the refusal of doctors from vaccination were the fear of complications, beliefs about low protection against infection and the subsequent decrease in immunity. According to healthcare professionals, the most effective means of prevention, in descending order, were a healthy lifestyle, the absence of fear of becoming ill, vaccination, drugs that stimulate immunity, the use of barrier measures, and other means. Conclusion. The ambiguous attitude of healthcare professionals towards vaccination against COVID-19 does exist and deserves the closest attention. Considering the issue's complexity, further research on the attitude of healthcare professionals toward vaccination is required.Copyright © 2023, Media Sphera Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Ziel/Aim The global SARS-CoV-2 vaccination campaign brought attention to a recent pitfall in tumor staging by PET/CT. Several publications reported a non-specific F-18-FDG tracer uptake in axillary lymph nodes after COVID-19 vaccination. Ga-68-FAPI PET/CT is a new oncologic imaging tool that may overcome this limitation. Methodik/Methods For this purpose, we compared the tracer uptake in a head-to-head and same-day F-18-FDG and Ga-68-FAPI PET/CT study. 11 patients from our prospective database (NCT04571086) were included showing vaccine-related tracer uptake in axillary lymph nodes up to 6 weeks after COVID- 19 vaccination. Ergebnisse/Results Among the total of 11 patients, all (n = 11) showed visual positive uptake in the lymph nodes ipsilateral to the injection side on F-18-FDG PET. None (n = 0) of the included patients showed significant tracer uptake on Ga-68-FAPI PET. Follow-up imaging confirmed reactive nodal uptake in all patients. The tumor detection efficacy for these patients was 73 % for F-18-FDG and 94 % for Ga-68-FAPI. Schlussfolgerungen/Conclusions In our case series, Ga-68-FAPI demonstrated resistance to vaccine-related pitfalls while presenting superior tumor detection.
ABSTRACT
History: Twenty-two year old male basic trainee was brought to the ED after collapsing during a routine ruck march. At mile 8/12, soldier was noted to develop an unsteady gate and had witnessed loss of consciousness. A rectal core temperature was obtained and noted to be >107degreeF. Cooling initiated with ice sheets and EMS was activated. On arrival to the ED, patient demonstrated confusion and persistently elevated core temperatures despite ice sheeting, chilled saline and cold water bladder lavage. Cooling measures were discontinued after patient achieved euthermia in the ED;however, his temperatures subsequently spiked>103degreeF. Given rebound hyperthermia, an endovascular cooling (EVC) device was placed in the right femoral vein and patient was transferred to the ICU. Multiple attempts to place EVC device on standby were unsuccessful with subsequent rebound hyperthermia. Prolonged cooling was required. Physical Exam: VS: HR 121, BP 85/68, RR 22 SpO2 100% RA, Temp 102.4degreeF Gen: young adult male, NAD, shivering, A&Ox2 (person and place only) HEENT: Scleral anicteric, conjunctiva non-injected, moist mucus membranes Neck: Supple, no LAD Chest: CTAB, no wheezes/rales/rhonchi CV: tachycardia, regular rhythm, normal S1, S2 without murmurs, rubs, gallops ABD: NABS, soft/non-distended, no guarding or rebound EXT: No LE edema, tenderness SKIN: blisters with broad erythematous bases on bilateral heels Neuro: CN II-XII grossly intact, 5/5 strength in all extremities. Differential Diagnosis: 216. Septic Shock 217. Hypothalamic Stroke 218. Exertional Heat Stroke (EHS) 219. Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome 220. Thyroid Storm Test Results: CBC: 18.2>14.5/40.6<167 CMP: 128/3.5 88/1831/2.7<104, AST 264, ALT 80, Ca 8.8 Lactate: 7.1 CK: 11 460 Myoglobin: 18 017 TSH: 3.16 CXR: No acute cardiopulmonary process Blood Cx: negative x2 CSF Cx: Negative COVID/Influenza/EBV: Negative Brain MRI: wnl. Final Diagnosis: Exertional Heat Stroke. Discussion(s): No EVC protocols exist for the management of EHS or rebound/refractory hyperthermia. As a result, the protocol used for this patient was adapted from post-cardiac arrest cooling protocols. It is unclear if this adapted protocol contributed to his delayed cooling and rebound hyperthermia as it was not intended for this patient demographic/ pathophysiology. Furthermore, despite initiating empiric antibiotics upon admission, delayed recognition and tailored therapy for his bilateral ankle cellulitis may have contributed to the difficulty in achieving euthermia. In summary, more research needs to be done to evaluate and develop an EVC protocol for EHS. Outcome(s): Euthermia was achieved and maintained after 36 hours of continuous EVC, at which point it was discontinued. His CK, AST/ALT, creatinine and sodium down-trended after discontinuation of EVC. Patient's antibiotics were transitioned to an oral formulation for treatment of ankle cellulitis and he was prepared for discharge. He was discharged with regular follow-up with the Fort Benning Heat Clinic. Follow-Up: After discharge, patient had regularly scheduled visits with the Fort Benning Heat Clinic. His typical lab markers for exertional heat stroke were regularly monitored. He had continued resolution of his Rhabdomyolysis, acute kidney injury and hyponatremia with typical treatment. Soldier returned to duty after 10 weeks of close monitoring and rehabilitation.
ABSTRACT
Background & Aims: In early January 2020, a new corona virus called corona was identified as an infectious agent by the World Health Organization and caused a viral pneumonia outbreak, the first of which was reported in Wuhan, China in December 2019. The virus has so far infected most countries in the world and has become a global problem. By this time in December 2021, about 265 million people in the world have been infected with this virus and 5 million 270 thousand people have died from this disease. According to the World Health Organization, the incidence of this disease is still increasing and will become the third leading cause of death in the world by 2030. This disease has a special complexity and has multiple dimensions and consequences that have caused many problems in the field of health, social and economic as well as psychological for people. The emergence of this disease is now a public health crisis. According to this research, exposure to news and restrictions caused by this disease can lead to many mental health problems. In fact, one of the situations that puts a lot of stress on people during the outbreak of covid 19 disease is the inability to predict and uncertainty about the control and end of the disease. Mental health is defined as a harmonious and harmonious behavior with society, recognizing and accepting social realities, the power to adapt to them and meeting one's balanced needs and is an important factor for the health of society. The prevalence of the disease can also increase feelings of loneliness, decrease social support, feelings of fear and anxiety to clinical stress and anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder associated with the disease, and decreased life expectancy. One of the hopeful factors is health and the disease can cause despair, fear and even despair of the patient. The outbreak of a disease has a much deeper and wider impact and affects not only the affected community and relatives, but the entire community. Because everyone finds themselves at risk, and therefore people's feel of safe and healthy changes, and this situation causes people to despair. Hope is the capacity to imagine the ability to create paths to desirable goals and to imagine the motivation to move in those paths. Hope predicts physical and mental health such as positive response to medical interventions, mental health, effective getting along, and health-promoting behaviors. Covid 19 disease can also lead to psychological problems due to its infectious nature and unpredictable nature. In this regard, various researchers consider the implementation of public health policies, including areas related to individual and collective mental health in accordance with the different stages of the epidemic of this disease is very necessary. Mindfulness can be an effective tool for achieving peace of mind and body that helps people become aware of their current feelings. Mindfulness-based interventions are considered as one of the third generation or third wave cognitive-behavioral therapies. Mindfulness is a form of meditation rooted in Eastern religious teachings and rituals, especially Buddhism. Segal has defined mindfulness as paying attention to specific and purposeful ways, in the present time, without judgment or prejudice. Linhan stressed for the first time the need to pay attention to mindfulness as one of the essential components of psychological therapy. Mindfulness requires the development of three components: judgment avoidance, purposeful awareness, and focus on the present moment. Focusing on the present and processing all aspects of the above experience makes one aware of the daily activities and automatic functioning of the mind in the past and future world and he controls emotions, thoughts, and physical states through moment-to-moment awareness of thoughts. As a result, it is released from the everyday and automatic mind focused on the past and the future. Although general vaccination has reduced the virus in some countries, including Iran, and reduced the number of infected people, a large num
ABSTRACT
Intro: The ongoing pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus has brought many new insights into medicine. During the first months of the pandemic, when there were no comprehensive guidelines for precise antimicrobial therapy, empirical overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics was observed. Which resulted in the development of clostidium infection in certain cases. In our report, we address 83 cases of clostridial colitis in post-covid patients from 3/2020 to 3/2021 and their specific therapy. Method(s): Retrospective analysis of risk factors for clostridial infection and therapy of clostridial colitis. Finding(s): In the period 3/2020-3/2021, 9617 patients were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 virus infection in our hospital, of which 1247 were hospitalized. In 83 cases, clostridial colitis occurred during or after the covid infection had resolved. Mortality in this group was 17%, which corresponds to 14 patients. Previous empirical administered antiobiotics in COVID-19 infection contributed to the development of clostridial colitis in case of 22 patients (27%) by clarithromycin, in 14 pacients (17%) by penicillins and by 3rd generation cephalosporins in 9 patients (11%). The average duration of therapy with broad-spectrum antibiotics was 15.63 days (+-8.99). Other risk factors we observed are: PPI use (25%), active malignant disease (10%), previous glucocorticoid therapy (22%). Vancomycin was used in clostridial infection therapy in 47% (39), metronidazole in 31% (25) and fidaxonicin in 7% (6). In the group, we observed recurrence of clostridium difficile infection in 14% of patients and FMT was performed in 6 patients. Conclusion(s): This study shows a higher percentage of clostridial infection in cases of long-term therapy with broad-spectrum antibiotics. It also points to the effect of specific antimicrobial therapy for infection caused by the bacterium Clostridium difficile and the possibility of using fecal bacteriotherapy.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 brought with it unknowns related to systemic sclerosis. Objective: To know the clinical evolution and prognosis of COVID-19 in a cohort of patients with systemic sclerosis. Methods: During the pandemic, we had digital contact with a cohort of 197 patients with SSc. If they had any condition that met the suspected definition of COVID-19, they underwent polymerase chain reaction testing for SARS-CoV-2;they were treated on an outpatient or hospital basis without interfering with their treatment. They followed their evolution every 24 hours until they became asymptomatic or died. Results: Thirteen patients (6.6%), nine diffuse cutaneous (dcSSc), and four limited cutaneous (lcSSc) developed COVID-19 during nine months of follow-up. The immunosuppressants used at the time of the disease were: mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, and prednisone, in low doses. Seven patients had interstitial lung disease (ILD). The main symptoms were chest pain, cough, dyspnea, dysgeusia, and anosmia, 1 with mild symptoms without pneumonia, 11 with mild pneumonia, and one with severe pneumonia that required hospital management. Only one (7.7%) presented severe pneumonia, was hospitalized, and died. Conclusions: COVID-19 disease in patients with SSc can be overcome in most cases, even when they are ILD and were using immunosuppressants at the time of infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Copyright © 2023 Revista Medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of CoronaVac and ChAdOx1 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Method(s): These data are from the 'SAFER (Safety and Efficacy on COVID-19 Vaccine in Rheumatic Diseases)' study, a Brazilian multicentric longitudinal phase IV study to evaluate COVID-19 vaccine in immunomediated rheumatic diseases (IMRDs). Adverse events (AEs) in patients with RA were assessed after two doses of ChAdOx1 or CoronaVac. Stratification of postvaccination AEs was performed using a diary, filled out daily. The titers of neutralizing antibodies against the receptor-biding domain of SARS-CoV-2 (anti-RBD) were measured by chemilumine scence test after each dose of immunizers. Proportions between groups were compared using the Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) before and after vaccination was assessed using the McNemar test. Result(s): A total of 188 patients with RA were included in the study, most of them were female. CoronaVac was used in 109 patients and ChAdOx1 in 79. Only mild AEs were observed. The more common AEs after the first dose were pain at injection site (46,7%), headache (39,4%), arthralgia (39,4%) and myalgia (30,5%), and ChAdOx1 had a higher frequency of pain at the injection site (66% vs 32 %, p alpha 0.001) arthralgia (62% vs 22%, p alpha 0.001) and myalgia (45% vs 20%, p alpha 0.001) compared to CoronaVac. The more common AEs after the second dose were pain at the injection site (37%), arthralgia (31%), myalgia (23%) and headache (21%). Arthralgia (41,42 % vs 25 %, p = 0.02) and pain at injection site (51,43% vs 27%, p = 0.001) were more common with ChAdOx1. No patients had a flare after vaccination. The titers of anti-RBDafter two doses of ChAdOx1 were higher compared to two doses of CoronaVac (6,03 BAU/mL vs 4,67 BAU/mL, p alpha 0,001). Conclusion(s): The frequency of local adverse effects, particularly pain at injection site, was high. AEs were more frequent with ChAdOx1, especially after the first dose. The use of the immunizers dis not change the degree of inflammatory activity of the disease. In patients with RA, ChAdOx1 was more immunogenic than CoronaVac. .
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims It is recognised that immunosuppressive medications, often relied upon in the management of autoimmune rheumatic disease, inhibit vaccine-induced immunity against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. A key challenge for rheumatologists is maximising immunity provided by the vaccine in their patients. Recent data has implicated methotrexate (MXT), a commonly used disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD), in reducing patients' vaccine-induced immunity against the virus and studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of pausing MXT medication for 2-weeks after receiving the vaccine in boosting patients' immunity. There is a lack of data exploring the impact of concurrent biologic-DMARD (b-DMARD) use with MXT on COVID-19 infection rates in vaccinated individuals. This analysis forms part of a larger programme of research (clinicaltrials.gov NCT04542031) exploring COVID-19 in patients with rheumatic disease. Here we provide a comparative analysis of COVID-19 infection rates between patients taking MXT either with or without b-DMARD therapy and those on no immunosuppression. Methods We distributed two web-based questionnaires via SMS-messaging in April 2020 and December 2021 and two interim monitoring questionnaires in December 2020 and June 2021. All rheumatology patients with a valid mobile telephone number under follow up at the Royal Wolverhampton Trust were invited to participate in the study;those that consented received follow up questionnaires. We collected information on demographics, rheumatology diagnosis and treatment, vaccination status, and COVID-19 infection rates. Data were collected 7-days following questionnaire distribution. Results Initial questionnaires were sent to 7911 active follow up patients, 1636/ 7911 (21%) responded and consented to further follow up;906/1636 (55.4%) provided a complete response to the final survey which was subsequently linked to survey one enabling analysis. Responders were female (622/906, 68.7%), white (865, 95.5%), 60 years or above (519, 57.3%), and vaccinated (898/906;99.1%). Of those vaccinated significantly more patients that were on any immunosuppressive therapy compared to those on no immunosuppression (92/530 (17.4%) vs. 26/368 (7.1%);p<0.001), and more in the MXT monotherapy group compared to no immunosuppression (33/222 (14.9%) vs. 26/368 (7.1%);p=0.001) contracted COVID-19. Similar numbers in the MTX and b-DMARD and b-DMARD without MXT groups (23/140 (16.4%) vs. 36/168 (21.4%);p=0.23) contracted COVID-19. Conclusion Recent trial data from the VROOM study has demonstrated that omitting a patients MXT therapy for a 2-week period following administration of the COVID-19 vaccine doubles their antibody response. This data highlights that the risk of COVID-19 infection in vaccinated rheumatology patients is doubled in patients on any immunosuppressive medication compared to those on no immunosuppression, while there is no significant difference in infection rates between patients on MXT and a b-DMARD and b-DMARD therapy without MXT. Further work exploring the impact of different types of immunosuppression on COVID-19 vaccine-induced immunity and simple interventions to maximise this immunity in immunosuppressed individuals is required.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To evaluate the humoral immune response to the third dose (booster) of vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases who were seronegative after a two-dose regimen. Method(s): Observational study. Patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases who had not achieved seroconversion after a two-dose vaccine schedule against SARS-CoV-2 were included. To assess the humoral immune response, anti-RBD IgG (S protein receptor binding domain) neutralizing antibody titers were determined by ELISA (cutoff titer 200). The determination was made between 30 to 45 days after the third dose. Result(s): From 66 patients who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, 18 patients (29.5%) were seronegative after a two-dose schedule. 61% had SLE, 77% had comorbidities (61% with hypertension, p = 0.03). Patients were on treatment: 10 with prednisone (8 with doses greater than 10 mg/d, p = 0.01), 10 with hydroxychloroquine, one with methotrexate, one with leflunomide, four with azathioprine, five with my cophenolatemofetil and five with rituximab (they are the total number of non-responders on biological treatment, p = 0.03). Regarding the primary vaccination regimen, 11 received BBIBP-CorV (p = 0.01), 5 AZD1222, 1 Gam-COVID-Vac and 1 mRNA1273/Gam-COVID-Vac heterologous scheme. Of these 18 non-responders, 14 received a third dose;nine patients (62%) presented anti-RBD IgG detectable. Of the five patients who did not respond to the booster vaccination, three had received BBIBP-CorV as the initial schedule and the vaccines applied as a third dose were Ad5-nCoV (1), BNT162b2 (1), AZD 1222 (2) and Gam-COVID-Vac (1). They were being treated with: rituximab (2), azathioprine (2) and mycophenolate mofetil (1). Treatment with higher doses of prednisone was the only factor associated with non-seroconversion to the third dose (8 +/- 4.5;p 0.02). Conclusion(s): The third dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine allowed to improve the serological response to vaccination, achieving a seroconversion of 62% in this group of patients.
ABSTRACT
Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) contributes to bleeding during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. Although it is recognized that AVWS rapidly resolves after ECMO decannulation, this approach may often be clinically unsuitable. In such cases, optimal AVWS management during ECMO support is not well established. We report our approach to managing AVWS in a patient on veno-venous (VV) ECMO for 59 days. A 19-year-old male developed hypoxemic respiratory failure from SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Following intubation, he progressed to VV-ECMO support for refractory hypoxemia and was started on bivalirudin for systemic anticoagulation. Two days later, he developed refractory gastrointestinal and oro-nasopharyngeal bleeding despite blood product transfusions and discontinuing bivalirudin. He was started on pantoprazole along with infusions of octreotide and aminocaproic acid. Upper endoscopy on ECMO day 5 revealed an ulcerative bleeding vessel in the duodenum that was clipped. Recurrent mucosal bleeding precluded resumption of systemic anticoagulation. On ECMO day 23, AVWS was diagnosed based on elevated von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity (207%, normal 55-189%) and antigen (234%, normal 50-210%) levels with abnormally low VWF high-molecular-weight multimers. Factor VIII complex was administered twice over the following week. Between doses, the ECMO circuit was exchanged to empirically mitigate suspected shear-related VWF consumption from the fibrin burden, and a repeat endoscopy controlled additional intestinal bleeding with local hemostatic agents. He received 36 units of red blood cells, 2 units of platelets, 2 units of plasma, and 7 pooled units of cryoprecipitate over 31 days leading into these combined interventions. In the 28 days afterwards, he received 3 units of red blood cells, 3.5 pooled units of cryoprecipitate, and no additional platelets or plasma. Our patient was maintained off systemic anticoagulation for 54 of 59 days of VV-ECMO support without any thrombotic complications occurring. With no subsequent clinical evidence of bleeding, repeat VWF testing was done two months post-decannulation and showed near-normal VWF activity (54%) and normal multimer distribution. Our patient rehabilitated well without any neurologic deficits and on discharge was requiring supplemental oxygen with sleep and strenuous activity. Avoiding systemic anticoagulation, repleting VWF, maintaining circuit integrity, and providing local hemostasis, when possible, may be a safe and effective management strategy of AVWS on ECMO support when decannulation is not a viable option.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Bupivacaine is a local anesthetic which has been increasingly used in the post-operative state for pain control. Hepatotoxicity is a rare complication, and few cases are reported in patients with chronic liver disease. We present a case of acute liver injury from bupivacaine use in a healthy patient without prior history of liver disease. Case Description/Methods: A 68-year-old female with a past medical history of primary hypertension and recent nontraumatic complete tear of the right rotator cuff, presents to the hospital with fatigue, loss of appetite, and nausea. She recently underwent an arthroscopy of the right shoulder with repair of the rotator cuff two weeks prior. Her surgery was uncomplicated, and patient was started on bupivacaine ONQ pump infusion at 5 ml/hr for three days for post-operative pain. Further history reveals patient is non-alcoholic without prior liver disease, including cirrhosis. Review of systems is concerning for associated generalized abdominal discomfort. Physical exam demonstrated jaundice with scleral icterus with mild periumbilical tenderness to palpation without hepatosplenomegaly or ascites. Labs demonstrated elevated total bilirubin of 10.2 mg/dL with Alkaline phosphatase, ALT, and AST being 924 U/L, 429 U/L, and 279 U/L, respectively. Imaging studies including CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast, abdominal ultrasound, MRCP, and portal vein doppler were negative. Additional work up for underlying liver disease including acetaminophen and ethanol levels, SARS-CoV2, Hepatitis panel, EBV antigen, and urine toxicology were negative. It was determined patient had bupivacaine induced hepatotoxicity. Patient's health improved with conservative management and she was discharged with instructions for close monitoring of her LFTs. Discussion(s): Bupivacaine is an amino-amide anesthetic which binds to the intracellular portion of voltage-gated sodium channels and prevents depolarization of pain signals. It is metabolized by the liver and thus reports of hepatotoxicity, although rare, occur in patients with underlying liver pathology. Our patient became symptomatic with acute rise in LFTs. An extensive workup for other etiologies of acute liver toxicity was negative. Rapid vascular uptake of the drug is the most common reason for bupivacaine toxicity;and this remains a possibility for the mechanism of toxicity in our patient. A prior case report of bupivacaine hepatotoxicity demonstrated a cholestatic pattern, which is consistent with our findings.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Gastrointestinal tract involvement from herpes simplex virus is commonly associated with esophagitis. However, herpes simplex infection of the stomach is very rare with only a handful of cases being reported in immunocompromised patients. We present a case of herpes gastritis causing gastric outlet obstruction in an otherwise healthy, immunocompetent individual. Case Description/Methods: A 37-year-old male with a recent past medical history of COVID-19 infection, presented to the hospital with intractable nausea, vomiting, bloating, and early satiety for two days. Upon evaluation, CBC and CMP were remarkable for a WBC of 12.5 k/mm3 and ALT and AST of 124 U/L and 129 U/L, respectively. Lipase was 373 U/L. A CT abdomen/pelvis w/contrast showed circumferential wall thickening with edematous changes in the antrum consistent with localized inflammatory response. There was suspicion for gastric lymphoma and patient was admitted for further workup. An EGD was performed which showed exudative esophagitis and antral wall edema with luminal narrowing of gastric antrum. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) showed a 2.5 x 3 cm antral wall lesion worrisome for linitis plastica. Esophageal biopsies showed focal cytologic changes consistent with herpes esophagitis. The FNA of the gastric antral wall showed multinucleation of the basal cell layer with classic ground glass nuclei, consistent with herpes infection. No dysplasia or malignancy was seen. Both HSV1 and HSV2 IgG were elevated. HSV IgM was normal. A HSV PCR was ordered but never resulted. Patient was started on Valacyclovir 1 g PO BID for 10 days. He underwent a follow-up EGD 3 months later which showed complete resolution of the gastric antral changes (Figure). Discussion(s): Herpes gastritis is extremely rare. Literature review has revealed only 3 case reports of herpes gastritis;and all involved immunocompromised patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of herpes gastritis in an immunocompetent patient. Our patient presented with symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction which was caused by local inflammation from herpes simplex. It is unclear if having a COVID 19 infection altered patient's immunity and lead to herpes gastritis. This may need further investigation. No established guideline exists for treatment duration. Our patient received 10-day course of Valacyclovir, and his symptoms improved. Furthermore, patient had complete resolution of the herpes infection on follow-up EGD, indicating adequate treatment response.
ABSTRACT
Background and Aims: The treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) has evolved from genotype-specific to pan-genotypic direct acting antivirals (DAAs) with high efficacy and safety. However, drug-drug interactions (DDIs) must be avoided when used in combination with other medications, especially with the possible concomitant use of COVID-19 infection antivirals during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to access the potential DDIs of concomitant drugs with pan-genotypic DAAs and COVID-19 infection antivirals, and actual incidence of DDIs in real-world experience. Method(s): From January 2022 to October 2022, consecutive 116 HCV patients receiving pan-genotypic DAAs were retrospectively enrolled in Taipei Veterans General Hospital. The number of comedications and their potential DDIs with three pan-genotypic DAA regimens and three COVID-19 infection antivirals were analyzed. The actual incidence of DDIs during DAAs treatment were also investigated. Result(s): The mean age was 60.9 years old, with male predominant (55.2%). Of them, 12 (10.3%) patients had cirrhosis, and 24 (20.7%) patients had diabetes mellitus. Most patients were within Child-Pugh class A (109/116, 94.0%). The distribution of HCV genotypes was 8.6% in GT 1a, 36.2% in GT 1b, 39.7% in GT 2, 6.9% in GT 6, and 8.6% in indeterminate genotype, respectively. Of them, 43 (37.1%) patients received GLE/PIB, 69 (59.5%) received SOF/VEL 7plusmn;RBV, and 4 (3.4%) received SOF/VEL/VOX as DAAs regimen. Noteworthy, four patients had COVID-19 infection during DAAs treatment course. The rates of ETVR and SVR12 were 97.6% and 95.3%. The mean number of concomitant medications was 2.01. The distribution of concomitant drugs was 64.7% with no concomitant drug, 11.2% with 1-3 drugs, 11.2% with 4-6 drugs, 9.5% with 7-9 drugs, and 3.4% had more than 9 drugs, respectively. In potential contraindicated (red) DDI class, GLE/PIB was the most prevalent (7.3%), followed by SOF/VEL/VOX (6.4%), and SOF/VEL (1.8%) for non-cirrhosis and compensated cirrhosis patients;and no red DDI occurred in decompensated cirrhosis patients. In addition, the percentage of patients without potential DDIs was higher with SOF/VEL (79.8%) than with the other regimens. The potential red DDIs were predominantly with lipid-lowering agents for DAAs. For potential red DDI class with COVID-19 infection antivirals, Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir was the most prevalent (6%), followed by Remdesivir (0.9%), and no potential DDIs with Molnupiravir. For COVID-19 antivirals, the potential red DDIs was mainly with central nervous system drugs. Finally, the actual incidence of DDIs during DAAs treatment showed no red DDI occurred for all patients, and GLE/PIB was the most prevalent (93%) of no potential DDIs. Conclusion(s): The potential DDIs between these comedications differed, with the most potential DDIs occurring with GLE/PIB and Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir. After careful assessment of comedications and their potential DDIs, the actual incidence of DDIs could be reduced, and optimize safety in real-world practice.
ABSTRACT
The aim of the work is to form the principles of a personalized approach to the management of patients with COVID-19 with a complicated comorbid background. Material and methods. The article describes a clinical case of successful recovery of an 87-year-old patient from a new coronavirus infection COVID-19, complicated by pneumonia involving 36% of the lung parenchyma area. Along with age, the situation was aggravated by the comorbid status of the patient: the presence of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, hypertension, mechanical prostheses of the mitral and aortic valves, postinfarction cardiosclerosis, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes mellitus, stage 4 CKD, anemic syndrome, and subclinical hypothyroidism. Results. The C-reactive protein level at admission was 114.46 mg/L. The patient refused hospitalization. Baricitinib 4 mg, favipiravir according to the scheme, vitamin D 2000 units were prescribed for the previously taken therapy. Already after 3 days, C-reactive protein decreased by 4.6 times, and by the 8th day by 15.5 times and amounted to 7.38 mg/ml. The temperature returned to normal on day 2 from the start of baricitinib. In dynamics, a decrease in creatinine level to 177.0 mumol/l was noted, the glomerular filtration rate increased to 30 ml/min/1.73 m2, which corresponded to stage 3b of CKD (a pronounced decrease in glomerular filtration rate). Conclusion. Despite the age of the patient, many comorbidities, each of which could be fatal, the timely use of baricitinib on an outpatient basis made it possible to stop the progressive course of the disease.Copyright © Eco-Vector, 2023. All rights reserved.